As for bundling all the events you mentioned into a general category of “False Flags” it seems you baiting me to make a definitive statement while asking me to do ‘more guesswork and amateur “analysis” ‘ which you have already accused me of doing.

I’m pointing out how you false-flag obsessives never scrutinize attacks in the Middle East or against Russia. Often, you say all of those were “real” and only the Western ones are staged, which proves an anti-Western bias. None of the events you mentioned have you provided solid proof of false-flag beyond speculation about crisis actors.

As for your “My previous analysis of the group was inadequate.” comment to explain away your 180 degree turn around on the nature of ISIS, it appears to be a huge understatement. It’s a flip not an inadequacy.

The only thing I’ve changed is the motive/rationale for what Isis does. When I was under the spell of Sabbath Kaffirsm I tried to put all of the blame on their supposed backers, ignoring the theological underpinnings of what they do. The fact that some states have tacitly helped them get their hands on guns/supplies does not negate the fact that it is a genuine Islamist group that wants to establish a caliphate and implement Sharia law. They’ve already done it. And most of their leading backers are Islamist regimes out of the Gulf who at least partially share or sympathize with their goals. The Western powers were opportunistically leveraging them against Assad but I don’t think they ever fully controlled it. If anything the Saudis have more control of it but not even they can handle these nutters.

As for orders from “Langley” it is more likely Tel Aviv as the the Head of the Snake or chain of command.

You think Netanyahu secretly meets with the Isis leaders in Tel Aviv? That’s obviously absurd. Like these other states Israel has tacitly supported some of the rebel elements to leverage them against Assad and keep them killing each other. Doesn’t mean they have total control over them. The fact that Isis hasn’t attacked Israel is no more proof that they control Isis than the fact that Assad hasn’t attacked Israel proves they control him.

You’re way too conspiratorial thinking everything is rigidly controlled in a pyramidal fashion. A lot of the alliances we see are tenuous and temporary. The real world is far more chaotic than you wish it to be.

As for bundling all the events you mentioned into a general category of “False Flags” it seems you baiting me to make a definitive statement while asking me to do ‘more guesswork and amateur “analysis” ‘ which you have already accused me of doing. It’s a case by case subject for discussion so no need put me in your confused-truther/liberal grouping. Hoaxes/FF can be promoted and pontificated by unknowing people or media but some of the events I mentioned above are beyond belief and lack all probability of physically occurring, such as 2 Planes knocking down 3 buildings (Towers 1, 2 and Building 7).

As for your “My previous analysis of the group was inadequate.” comment to explain away your 180 degree turn around on the nature of ISIS, it appears to be a huge understatement. It’s a flip not an inadequacy. As for orders from “Langley” it is more likely Tel Aviv as the the Head of the Snake or chain of command.

Hoaxes/False Flags are right out of the First section of the Protocols, they used to call it “Make-Believe/Terrorization.” Over a hundred years old but they’re using the same tactics. You use to call out the Elephant in the room and now you are just pointing to crap it’s spewing all over the walls. You might be changing your opinion too abruptly IMO.
be well,
yogi

However, and at the same time, I get bored looking into these cases because the MSM and western governments don’t all just stop what they’re doing and give their attention to cases like these without twisting it in their own ways. There are real Islamic attacks that never make the MSM or ever get made mention of by the MSM/establishment. The establishment also has a penchant for framing whites in these attacks and if anyone goes to pro-black pages, they love talking about case after case of supposed ‘white attacks’ on black victims, whether these are white civilians or white cops.

There are far too many fishy things about what happened in Manchester for this to be ‘real’. One of those things is the establishment loves to conduct drills prior to, or even during these events; and these drills typically involve many, many people. Like this first vid, for example, which was a drill conducted a little over a year ago, in one of Manchester’s largest malls:

(Also, these events don’t merely just serve identitarians because the establishment is simultaneously working on abrogating more personal freedoms, and the ‘war on terror’ will never be ended any time soon, either. My personal contention is there are very real Islamic attacks, but when they make it to the MSM, they’re extremely, extremely likely to be staged).

https://www.buzzfeed.com/jimwaterson/manchester-arena-fake-news?utm_term=.hnZq664bB#.uuyYRRZaM

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-manchester-terror-attack-is-it-a-false-flag/5592055

http://tomatobubble.com/manchester_bombing_hoax.html

https://nodisinfo.com/white-masked-woman-london-tube-bomings-hoax/

This acting is fake AF:

You didn’t answer any of my questions. Are attacks in the Middle East and against Russia “false flags” too or just the West? This question is crucial because it exposes the fraud of the truther narrative. Hence why you won’t answer it.

If London Bridge was a false flag that would mean every single witness/victim to the stabbing rampage was a “crisis actor”. I don’t believe such elaborate hoaxing is feasible.

There have been multiple attacks in the Middle East over the past few weeks. Those all false flags too? Why do the false flags only happen in the West and never elsewhere according to your narrative? Isis-inspired attacks on Russia are fake too or only West?