The people who push the “Jews only” or “Jews mainly” explanation of feminism (or any other left-wing phenomenon really) are either Christians who want to hide the role of Christians in it, or they are dupes who have fallen for cherry-picked memes like this one, produced by dimwits who think fishing a handful of Jewish names out of a pool of hundreds of feminists is proof of a conspiracy while ignoring all the others.

By saying “every single aspect” of X is Jewish, they are implying that there are no non-Jews doing the same thing and promoting the same ideas. This is categorically false in every case, no matter what issue you look at.

Let’s look at early feminism.

Early feminism in the West was not particularly Jewish, no matter which country we look at. The meme cherry picks Jewish feminists mostly from the second wave of the movement, and lists only one early Jewish suffragette of the first wave, Ernestine Rose, who “had renounced Judaism at an early age and was an active atheist.” But of course the memers leave out a whole ton of non-Jewish suffragettes who led the movement.

America

The earliest American feminist was Christian Abigail Adams, the wife of second US President John Adams:

One of the earliest women’s rights groups was the “Woman’s Christian Temperance Union”:

The two biggest names in the early suffragette movement in America were Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony, both Christian women.

Elizabeth Cady Stanton (née Cady; November 12, 1815 – October 26, 1902) was an American writer and activist who was a leader of the women’s rights movement in the U.S. during the mid- to late-19th century. She was the main force behind the 1848 Seneca Falls Convention, the first convention to be called for the sole purpose of discussing women’s rights, and was the primary author of its Declaration of Sentiments. Her demand for women’s right to vote generated a controversy at the convention but quickly became a central tenet of the women’s movement.[1] She was also active in other social reform activities, especially abolitionism. In 1851, she met Susan B. Anthony and formed a decades-long partnership that was crucial to the development of the women’s rights movement. During the American Civil War, they established the Women’s Loyal National League to campaign for the abolition of slavery, and they led it in the largest petition drive in U.S. history up to that time. They started a newspaper called The Revolution in 1868 to work for women’s rights. After the war, Stanton and Anthony were the main organizers of the American Equal Rights Association, which campaigned for equal rights for both African Americans and women, especially the right of suffrage. When the Fifteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was introduced that would provide suffrage for black men only, they opposed it, insisting that suffrage should be extended to all African Americans and all women at the same time.

That 1848 feminist conference was held in a Christian church:

First wave feminism is thought to have officially started in 1848, during the first women’s rights convention at Seneca Falls, New York. 300 women and men met in the basement of a Wesleyan Methodist church and signed Elizabeth Cady Stanton’s Declaration of Sentiments, publicly declaring their belief in the legal equality of women to men.

So these two Christian women established all the important organizations of early American feminism, convened the first feminist congress and wrote foundational documents like “Declaration of Sentiments”. On Anthony’s influence:

After the war, they initiated the American Equal Rights Association, which campaigned for equal rights for both women and African Americans. They began publishing a women’s rights newspaper in 1868 called The Revolution. A year later, they founded the National Woman Suffrage Association as part of a split in the women’s movement. The split was formally healed in 1890 when their organization merged with the rival American Woman Suffrage Association to form the National American Woman Suffrage Association, with Anthony as its key force.

They founded feminist newspapers and groups and also supported black rights.

Another big name: Matilda Joslyn Gage.

Gage was considered to be more radical than either Susan B. Anthony or Elizabeth Cady Stanton (with whom she wrote History of Woman Suffrage,[24] and Declaration of the Rights of Women). …She served as president of the National Woman Suffrage Association (NWSA) from 1875 to 1876 and served as either Chair of the Executive Committee or Vice President for over twenty years. …In 1870, Gage published a pamphlet called Woman as an Inventor.[9] The pamphlet was described as ‘Woman Suffrage Tracts – No. 1’ and was published by the New York State Woman Suffrage Association, which Gage helped to found.[10] In 1883, Gage published a similar essay called Woman as an Inventor in the North American Review.[11] In both pamphlets, Gage argued that women were already competent inventors and supported her argument by citing examples of women inventors.

Another big one who inspired both Stanton and Anthony was Lucy Stone, also Christian:

Stone wrote, extensively, about a wide range of women’s rights, publishing and distributing speeches by herself and others, and convention proceedings. In the long-running and influential[4] Woman’s Journal, a weekly periodical that she founded and promoted, Stone aired both her own and differing views about women’s rights. Called “the orator”,[5] the “morning star,”[6] and the “heart and soul”[7] of the women’s rights movement, Stone influenced Susan B. Anthony to take up the cause of women’s suffrage.[8] Elizabeth Cady Stanton wrote that “Lucy Stone was the first person by whom the heart of the American public was deeply stirred on the woman question.”[9] Together, Anthony, Stanton, and Stone have been called the 19th-century “triumvirate” of women’s suffrage and feminism.

Stone founded the American Woman Suffrage Association:

Francis Wright:

In the late 1820s, Wright was among the first women in America to speak publicly about politics and social reform before gatherings of both men and women.[1] She advocated universal education, the emancipation of slaves, birth control, equal rights, sexual freedom, legal rights for married women, and liberal divorce laws. Wright was also vocal in her opposition to organized religion and capital punishment. The clergy and the press harshly criticized Wright’s radical views. Her public lectures in the United States led to the establishment of Fanny Wright societies.

The Grimké sisters:

Antoinette Brown Blackwell:

Harriet Taylor Upton:

A big supporter and funder of women’s suffrage was wealthy socialite Alva Belmont:

She was inspired to take up the cause after hearing a lecture by Ida Husted Harper.

Another wealthy backer of suffrage was Phoebe Hearst, a Christian who converted to the Baha’i faith:

Other Christian (or otherwise non-Jewish) leaders of American feminism: Carrie Chapman Catt, Ida Husted Harper, Lucretia Mott, Frances Ellen Watkins Harper, Frederick Douglass, Martha Wright, Betsy Mix Cowles, Jane Hunt, Mary Ann M’Clintock, Hannah M. Darlington, Lydia Maria Child, Frances Dana Barker Gage, James Mott, Ann Preston, Abby Kelley Foster, Paulina Wright Davis, Anna Howard Shaw and many more.

Here are the 100 signatories of Elizabeth Stanton’s Declaration of Sentiments:

Virtually all Anglo-Saxon, Celtic, Germanic and French names and a plethora of Quakers. You can look at the Seneca Falls Convention in 1848, the Ohio Women’s Convention at Salem in 1850, the Pennsylvania Woman’s Convention at West Chester in 1852 and other similar conventions of the day, and you’ll see mostly Christian women at the helm.

Virginia Minor and her husband Francis Minor were among the first to attempt to legally overturn the ban on women’s voting rights:

Christians Alice Paul and Lucy Burns led the campaign for the 19th Amendment (women’s vote) and then started the National Women’s Party:

Alice Stokes Paul (January 11, 1885 – July 9, 1977) was an American Quaker, suffragette, suffragist, feminist, and women’s rights activist, and one of the foremost leaders and strategists of the campaign for the Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which prohibits sex discrimination in the right to vote. Paul initiated, and along with Lucy Burns and others, strategized events such as the Woman Suffrage Procession and the Silent Sentinels, which were part of the successful campaign that resulted in the amendment’s passage in August 1920.[1]

After 1920, Paul spent a half-century as leader of the National Woman’s Party, which fought for the Equal Rights Amendment, written by Paul and Crystal Eastman, to secure constitutional equality for women. She won a major permanent success with the inclusion of women as a group protected against discrimination by the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Other important women in the National Women’s Party were Mabel Vernon and Anne Henrietta Martin.

This website lists 20 important American suffragette activists, virtually none appear to be Jewish:

The abolitionist anti-slavery movement was also led by American Quakers.

It isn’t until the second wave of American feminism that Jewish women start to take a more prominent role. Jewish websites, as they often do, like to boast of the role of Jews in various things as if to present themselves as a particularly enlightened “moral” group showing others the way.

This is part of their Tikkun Olam/social justice ideology embedded in the religion. But even in these cases, they tend to embellish their own importance by ignoring all the prominent non-Jews doing the same thing, which is ironically what the Neo-Nazis also do from the opposite angle. Both want to portray Jews as either especially good or especially evil.

Some of the prominent Jewish feminists of the second wave were Betty Friedan, Andrea Dworkin, Gloria Steinem, Naomi Wolf and others. Of course, they were not alone and had plenty of help from non-Jewish feminists.

Wiki has 42 entries for “Jewish-American Feminists” meanwhile it has 163 entries for “African-American feminists” and 10 for “Asian-American feminists”. That’s not including all the White non-Jewish feminists, which there is not a specific page for.

A magazine listed 37 influential women with feminist tendencies which includes these people:

1. The Suffragettes (mostly Christian)
2. Simone de Beauvoir (French Gentile)
3. Eleanor Roosevelt (American Gentile)
4. Marlene Dietrich (German-American Gentile)
5. Betty Friedan (Jewish-American)
6. Gloria Steinem (Jewish-American)
7. Angela Davis (African-American)
8. Bell Hooks (African-American)
9. Barbara Walters (Jewish-American)
10. Coretta Scott King (African-American)
11. Maya Angelou (African-American)
12. Audre Lorde (African-American)
13. Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Jewish-American)
14. Yoko Ono (Japanese)
15. Alice Walker (African-American)
16. Hillary Clinton (American Gentile)
17. Oprah Winfrey (African-American)
18. Diane Von Furstenberg (Jewish)
19. Madonna (American Gentile)
20. Sheryl Sandberg (Jewish-American)
21. Malala Yousafzai (Muslim)
22. Angelina Jolie (American Gentile)
23. Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie (Nigerian)
24. Beyoncé (African-American)
25. Roxane Gay (Haitian-American)
26. Janet Mock (African-American/mixed race)
27. Emma Watson (British Gentile)
28. Patrisse Cullors (African-American)
29. Tarana Burke (African-American)
30. Michelle Obama (African-American)
31. Amal Clooney (British-Lebanese)
32. Meghan Markle (African-American/mixed race)
33. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (Latina-American)
34. Naomi Klein (Jewish-American)
35. Kathleen Neal Cleaver (African-American)
36. Winona LaDuke (Native American)
37. Laverne Cox (African-American)

That’s 7 of 37 or 19% of these women are Jewish. 17 of 37 or 45% are black. Clearly, blacks are also over-represented in the second wave American feminist movement. Jewish and black over-representation in liberal causes is likely due to various factors related to historical “oppression” consciousness related to slavery and the holocaust, etc.

If we look at the 2017 women’s march in the US, these were the organizers:

Melissa Miotke (Polish/German name, unknown religion), Teresa Shook (unknown religion), Evvie Harmon (religion unknown), Vanessa Wruble (Jewish), Bob Bland (religion unknown, but was accused of anti-Semitism so not a likely J), Linda Sarsour (Muslim), Tamika Mallory (black), Carmen Perez (Latina), Gloria Steinem (Jewish), Harry Belafonte (black, distant J ancestry raised Catholic), LaDonna Harris (Native American), Angela Davis (black), Dolores Huerta (Hispanic). Mallory, Sarsour and Perez were all accused of anti-Semitism, which led to the Jewish Wruble quitting. Clearly there is an array of people involved in feminism from all kinds of backgrounds.

These Jewish women are into feminism probably partly as a result of the “social justice” ethic of Judaism (same reason the Christian social justice teachings led many Christians into women’s rights and anti-slavery activism) and also just because they’re women and want privileges as many women do. This article on Jewish feminists lists the social justice motive and a rejection of Jewish patriarchal values:

Another article on the topic says a similar thing, that Jewish women first began their revolt within their own community (meaning they’re not applying a different standard for Jews):

So Jewish feminists were rebelling against their own patriarchal traditions within Judaism and broadened that fight to a generic feminism. Their sex is the most important factor here. They’re not Jewish men, but women, just as most of the early suffragettes were Christian women and not men. The blacks involved in feminism are black women, not many men.

The wignat conspiracy take here is that Jewish feminists are promoting this to “mess with the Gentiles” and wreck society for malevolent anti-Gentile reasons, ignoring that they’re promoting the same stuff for Jews. They don’t make the same argument for the Christian suffragettes or the other non-Jewish feminists. Why not? Is feminism a conspiracy of women since virtually all feminists are women? One could make that claim, easily. This conspiracy framing is weak because these Jewish feminists are not protecting Jews from the feminist indoctrination, but rather include them in it and promote it for Israel too. It’s not like they’re protecting Jews from feminism while pushing it exclusively onto non-Jews.

Betty Friedan for example started an analogous feminist movement in Israel:

Feminism is rampant in Israel where laws are biased against men. This documentary explores the feminist outrages in Israel against men, noting “Israeli women are the freest in the East, emancipated and independent.”

Israel has had the same first and second waves of feminism and feminists there do the same things they do in the West.

Here are some Jewish feminist groups in Israel:

Jewish feminists in Israel oppose the religious right and demand more feminist laws:

Gloria Steinem also pushes feminism in Israel and, like most feminists, is a left-liberal who opposes Netanyahu and the “far-right” in Israel:

Feminist Naomi Wolf is herself pro-Palestinian and a critic of the Israeli Right.

Here Wolf criticizes the Israeli lobby in the US:

Another prominent Canadian-Jewish feminist and leftist, Naomi Klein, is a staunch anti-Zionist:

Andrea Dworkin also pushes feminism in Israel and criticizes the country, denouncing the status of “male Jews” over female Jews:

Lots of feminists, being left-liberals politically, support Palestine and not Israel.

So once again we see these Jewish feminists pushing their ideology consistently across national and ethnic lines, which weakens the conspiracy angle that it’s designed to specifically “hurt Gentiles” and spare Jews its effects.

Numerous feminists like Dworkin are also anti-pornography:

Dworkin wrote a book against porn:

Another Jewish feminist Gail Dines was described as the “world’s leading anti-pornography campaigner” and founder of Stop Porn Culture:

So if the agenda of Jewish feminists was simply to “wreck society,” as some allege, then why come out against pornography which helps wreck society? They are indeed perpetrating harm to society with feminism, but they’re doing it under the delusion that feminism helps women. Like the non-Jewish feminists proliferating the same ideas, they’re true believers in the ideology and regard it good for women.

On top of this, there are some prominent Jewish conservative anti-feminists (often second wave-critical) like Laura Loomer, Melanie Phillips (author of “The Sex Change Society: Feminised Britain and the Neutered Male”), Ashley St. Clair (of TPUSA), Judith Reisman (another anti-porn crusader), LibsOfTikTok (Chaya Raichik), Ben Shapiro, Dennis Prager, Christina Hoff Sommers and others.

So if you can find Jews on the other side of this issue, as well as Jewish feminists pushing the same stuff for both Jews in the West and in Israel, then it can’t be considered a generic “conspiracy” to attack Gentiles. They are consistent liberals. And if there are tons of Gentiles doing the same thing —as is the case here—then it’s not a conspiracy of a single ethnic group against another. It’s a women’s movement so women of all races and backgrounds are in it.

Lastly, let’s look at the #MeToo movement. It was started by a black woman, Tarana Burke:

The official MeToo organization started by Burke is staffed almost exclusively by black women:

Their contributors are mostly black and their board is mostly black with one White woman:

It was picked up and promoted by all kinds of celebs of different backgrounds:

The New York Times ran a piece on all the prominent men who were taken down by MeToo sexual assault allegations, the most famous being Jewish Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein. The list includes numerous Jews like aforementioned Weinstein, media mogul Leslie Moonves, senator Al Franken, journalist Mark Halperin, senator Ira Silverstein, TV journalist Matt Lauer (half J), conductor James Levine, editor Lorin Stein, director Bryan Singer, media exec Eric Weinberger, casino mogul Steve Wynn and numerous others. Evidently, Jews are not invincible and their power is not absolute.

If Jews were single-handedly running the “feminist movement” as a tribal operation, then none of these powerful Jewish men would have been targeted and forced out of their jobs by #MeToo accusers.

The UK

The earliest feminists in the UK were Mary Wollstonecraft and Harriet Taylor Mill (wife of classical liberal philosopher John Stuart Mill).

Wollstonecraft, who was raised Christian but stopped attending church, was a key feminist intellectual who was inspired by the French Revolution/Enlightenment.

She is best known for the treatise, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, in which “she argues that women are not naturally inferior to men but appear to be only because they lack education. She suggests that both men and women should be treated as rational beings and imagines a social order founded on reason.”

Wollstonecraft’s writings and “advocacy of women’s equality and critiques of conventional feminity have been significant in the development of feminism.”

Harriet and John Mill co-authored the treatise, “The Enfranchisement of Women”, one of the first to appear advocating for total gender equality before the law.

John Stuart Mill introduced a petition to parliament in 1866 to give women the right to vote:

He was one of the earliest “proponents of gender equality, having been recruited by American feminist John Neal during his stay in London circa 1825–1827.” He authored a book, The Subjection of Women, which was seen as “an affront to European conventional norms regarding the status of men and women” for its egalitarian thrust.

Thus, he was a very influential early feminist in the UK. Mill was agnostic but his father had once been an ordained priest.

The mother of the British suffragette movement was raised Christian (although irreligious), Emily Pankhurst and her daughters.

The UK government takes note of her central role in British women’s suffrage:

The Pankhurst family is closely associated with the militant campaign for the vote. In 1903 Emmeline Pankhurst and others, frustrated by the lack of progress, decided more direct action was required and founded the Women’s Social and Political Union (WSPU) with the motto ‘Deeds not words’.

Emmeline Pankhurst (1858-1928) became involved in women’s suffrage in 1880. She was a founding member of the WSPU in 1903 and led it until it disbanded in 1918. Under her leadership the WSPU was a highly organised group and like other members she was imprisoned and went on hunger strike protests.

Membership of the WSPU was limited to women only. Emmeline Pankhurst’s daughters, Christabel, Sylvia and Adela, were committed members.

Wiki gives us this bio:

Emily Pankhurst was a British political activist who organised the British suffragette movement and helped women to win in 1918 the right to vote in Great Britain and Ireland. In 1999, Time named her as one of the 100 Most Important People of the 20th Century, stating that “she shaped an idea of objects for our time”. She founded and became involved with the Women’s Franchise League, which advocated suffrage for both married and unmarried women.

Millicent Fawcett was a leading suffragette who “campaigned for women’s suffrage by legal change and in 1897–1919 led Britain’s largest women’s rights association, the National Union of Women’s Suffrage Societies (NUWSS).”

She took inspiration from early English feminist Emily Davies, who was raised by a Christian priest:

Sophia Duleep Singh, of Indian descent, was a major suffragette in England who “was one of several Indian women who pioneered the cause of women’s rights in Britain”:

She was also an early advocate for racial egalitarianism in Britain:

Emily Davison “was a staunch feminist and passionate Christian.”

Davison was a tireless campaigner for women’s right to vote:

Kitty Marion (German-born Schafer) was a leading suffragette and abortion advocate:

Her religion is not reported anywhere.

Known as the “first female press photographer,” Cristina Broom is credited with taking photos of suffragette protests and thereby publicizing their cause:

Other influential British suffragettes with a Christian or otherwise non-Jewish background include: Ada Flatman, Flora Drummond, Annie Kenney, Emmeline Pethick-Lawrence, Mary Blathwayt, Clara Codd, Charlotte Marsh, Muriel Matters, etc. Among others.

Here’s a larger list of British suffragettes:

If we skip ahead to today, the most toxic feminist in the British government is Jess Phillips:

Despite her “feminism,” she voted against a public inquiry into the Pakistani grooming gangs:

The most prominent British celebrity feminist is Emma Watson:

The most prominent feminist group in the UK is The Fawcett Society. Here is their board:

So we see some British names and some Arabs. Their staff has a couple foreign names and some Anglos.

Wiki’s list of “British women’s rights activists” has 155 entries. Here they are, mostly Anglo names with some Arabs and Jews thrown in:

The “British feminists” page has 129 entries, mostly Anglo names:

The “British socialist feminists” page has 91 entries, mostly Anglo names, a couple Jews mixed in:

The “British suffragists” page has 151 entries, mostly Anglo names:

The “British feminist writers” page has 130 entries, mostly Anglos with a few Arabs and probably Jews:

The “Scottish feminists” page has 30 entries, mostly Scottish names:

The one Jewish surname there Bernstein came from a “family retained their Jewish surname they identified as Christian.”

The “Welsh feminists” page has 21 entries, mostly Welsh surnames a few foreign:

Canada

Here are the “Famous Five” Canadian suffragettes:

Henrietta Edwards was a strong Baptist Christian. She founded various women’s groups:

Nellie McClung was a Christian.

Louise McKinney was Christian.

Emily Murphy was a Christian.

Irene Parlby has no religious reference but has an Anglo name.

These five led all the legal challenges to get women full rights:

On August 27, 1927, they petitioned the federal government to refer the issue of the eligibility of women to be senator to the Supreme Court of Canada. This petition was the foundation of the Persons Case, a leading constitutional decision. Although most Canadian women had the vote in federal elections and all provinces but Quebec by 1927, the case was part of a larger drive for political equality. This was the first step towards equality for women in Canada and was the start to the first wave of feminism.

Most of the early women’s groups were started by Christians and one group was started by a Jew in Toronto.

Australia

Women’s suffrage in Australia was led mainly by Anglo-Christian women.

Here are the original members of the “Womanhood Suffrage League of New South Wales”:

All of them have clear Anglo surnames and Jewish background doesn’t come up for any of them on Wiki.

Ireland

Here are the main figures of the suffragette movement in Ireland:

France

France’s leading feminist philosopher and writer was Simone de Beauvoir, raised Catholic.

Her influence on French feminism was huge:

She was best known for her “trailblazing work in feminist philosophy”,[8] The Second Sex (1949), a detailed analysis of women’s oppression and a foundational tract of contemporary feminism.

The French Union for Women’s Suffrage was led by one Jewish woman and three non-Jewish women.

The group Suffrage des femmes was founded by Hubertine Auclert, who was Catholic.

Here’s a larger list of French suffragettes:

Possibly two of these people are Jewish: Caroline Kauffmann and Louise Weiss. The rest most likely just French.

Iceland

Said to be the most liberal country in Europe, Iceland’s feminism was always led by Icelandic women.

“the first women’s magazine Framsókn is founded by Ingibjörg Skaptadóttir and Sigríður Þorsteinsdóttir in 1895, and a women’s suffrage organisation, the Icelandic Women’s Rights Association, was founded by Bríet Bjarnhéðinsdóttir in 1907”

“A bill for women’s suffrage was agreed on by the Althing in 1911, ratified by the Althing in 1913, and enacted on 19 June 1915 by the Danish king but only granted the vote to women over 40… In 1920 these restrictions were lifted after Iceland became an independent state under the Danish crown in 1918”

The Icelandic Women’s Rights Association was founded by Bríet Bjarnhéðinsdóttir.

In 1975 Icelandic feminists launched the “women’s strike” where they refused to work for a day. 90% of Icelandic women participated.

The 1975 strike led to the election of the first elected female president in the Western world, Vigdís Finnbogadottir, in 1980 who ruled Iceland for 16 consecutive years.

“Shortly after she took office, the number of women in the Althing saw a significant increase.”

That Icelandic women’s strike inspired other feminists across Europe to do the same:

Iceland’s 1975 strike inspired similar protests in other countries including Poland, where women boycotted jobs and classes in 2016 to protest a proposed abortion ban. In Spain, women staged a 24-hour strike in 2018 on March 8, International Women’s Day, under the theme “If we stop, the world stops.” Spain’s acting equality minister, Irene Montero, said Tuesday that the 2018 strike was inspired by Iceland’s 1975 walkout and expressed full support for the latest protest.

Iceland elected the first female openly gay prime minister, Jóhanna Sigurðardóttir, who served from 2009 to 2013. She said: “The Nordic countries are leading the way on women’s equality, recognizing women as equal citizens rather than commodities for sale.”

Iceland’s second female prime minister passed a “gender pay gap” law.

Same thing in other Nordic countries.

Spain

This website lists five leading Spanish suffragettes and feminists.

Clara Campoamor:

is considered one of the mothers of the feminist and suffragist movement in Spain, being one of the three deputies of the constituent courts of the Second Republic. Defender of the equality of women’s rights, she was one of the impellers of the approval of the universal suffrage in Spain, obtaining the feminine vote in the first republican elections, as well as the first divorce law.

She founded and led various women’s groups:

María Goyri:

Despite being a feminist, she supported Franco in the civil war:

Francesca Bonnemaison i Farriols:

Soledad Cazorla, a lawyer who pushed for prosecutions of men based on “gender violence” leading to the current nightmare state:

Ada Colau, Catalan lesbian politician who leads feminist “strikes” and other nonsense:

Wiki’s “Spanish feminists” page has 138 entries, all clearly Spanish surnamed women (not worth going through all the names just to find a tiny sprinkling of Jews):

All of the leading feminists in Spain today are Spanish, here’s a few:

Irene Montero, leader of the leftist Podemos party, pushed the “yes is yes” feminist law in parliament which makes it easier for women to accuse men of rape and sexual assault. She has in fact led all of the cancerous feminist initiatives in recent years making Spain “among Europe’s most feminist countries.”

Montero’s former husband Pablo Iglesias, founder of Podemos:

Yolanda Diaz, leader of leftist Sumar party:

Rita Maestre, Podemos politician and radical feminist:

Pedro Sanchez (president) is a full-on radical feminist who boasted of putting more women than men in his cabinet:

This degenerate even boasts a “feminist foreign policy”:

Íñigo Errejón, former Podemos politician and male feminist:

Despite being a gaylord feminist who says “believe women” no matter what, he is currently being accused of sexual assault by various women and was forced to step down:

Ana Redondo, the current minister of “equality,” a radfem who says men can’t be victims of domestic violence:

Juan Carlos Monedero, co-founder of Podemos party, and radfem progressive:

Luis Zapatero, former PSOE president, another big feminist who implemented the “gender violence law” and same-sex marriage:

Ione Belarra, Podemos feminist:

With all of these aggressive feminist women running the show, Spain has sunk into a feminazi hellhole:

Sanchez’s cabinet is entirely Spanish people, no Jews:

Despite Spain being led entirely by Spaniards, it’s the most leftist-feminist country in Europe. The Jew-trappers will cope by saying all of these people are “paid off” by Jews (despite campaigns being mostly publicly financed), which is laughable considering that all of these Spanish leftists are PRO-PALESTINE and oppose Israel. Sanchez just did an arms embargo on Israel over the Gaza war.

This is a list of 27 Spanish billionaires. There’s only two Jews on the list: one is dead and the other was “brought up Catholic by her mother and was for some years associated with the Legionnaires of Christ.”

Conclusion

The purpose of this article is not to blame feminism exclusively on “Christians,” but to show that it’s not exclusively the fault of Jews or any one group of people. If anything, women are the evident protagonists behind feminism, but not all women are to blame either and some men are to blame too.

Like in every case here, a variety of people from different backgrounds support feminism. Christians led the way for women’s suffrage in most Western countries and Jews took up prominent posts in the second wave, but mostly in the United States because it has a large Jewish population. In countries with few Jews, like Iceland, Ireland, Spain, Scandinavia, etc., feminism is led by non-Jewish European women.

At the end of the day, feminism is a women’s movement so women lead it. Their particular ethnic or religious backgrounds and possible motivations are less important than their sex, which is the main reason they’re feminists.

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a small contribution.

Please share and subscribe as well!

Breitbart:

Fans walked out of a Halsey concert in Phoenix, Arizona, over the weekend after the pop singer went on a pro-abortion rant in reaction to the U.S. Supreme Court overruling Roe v. Wade.

“You guys are at this concert right now, because I had an abortion that saved my life,” the singer told her fans, insinuating that she wouldn’t have been able to figure out how to become successful if she had a child. Halsey, who had her first child last summer, said “I struggled to get pregnant for a very long time.”

And I know that the reality is that some of the people I am looking at right now are going to need an abortion one day,” the singer insisted. “And you deserve that.”

“If you don’t like it, you can go home right now,” Halsey added.

Halsey’s fans did just that, walking out of the venue after her pro-abortion rant.

“THE AMOUNT OF PEOPLE WHO JUST WALKED OUT OF THE HALSEY CONCERT AFTER NIGHTMARE WHEN SHE SPOKE ABOUT ABORTION WAS SICKENING,” one fan tweeted, to which Halsey commented, “downside of doing outdoor venues: no door to hit them on the way out.”

These demonic abortionist women constantly tell fake stories like this to justify their bloodlust to kill babies. “An abortion saved my life” is the canned response for these NPCs when justifying their decision to murder their child.

From Halsey’s Wikipedia:

Halsey is openly bisexual. In March 2021, she announced that she uses both “she/her” and “they/them” pronouns. Halsey has bipolar disorder.

Leftist women like Halsey are customarily mentally ill which is why they have the beliefs that they have. All leftist women are severally mentally ill and a danger to the public.

This is why women used to be relegated to the home. Allowing them out in public unattended was a public nuisance. And look at things now, with deranged satanists like Halsey allowed “careers” is music, which they use as a platform to spread the mental disease known as leftism.

Unchaining women from monogamous marriage and homemaking opened Pandora’s Box of evil. I don’t think we should ban all women from the workforce as some jobs are better suited for women, like child care and some service jobs, but a competent government would make it illegal for harlots to speak in public.

Unleashing the influence of women has led us down this dark path. Abortion-on-demand is a female creation, like most modern nonsense. The feminine impulse will always be to support what’s in the interests of the female gender, which they falsely believe to be unlimited female “freedom”.

A small minority of honorable women oppose this crap today, but they are usually shouted down and shamed into silence by aggressive mobs of sadistic leftist women who are the dominant force in most institutions.

“German women! German men! It is a happy accident that my first speech since taking charge of the Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda is to German women. Although I agree with Treitschke that men make history, I do not forget that women raise boys to manhood. You know that the National Socialist movement is the only party that keeps women out of daily politics. This arouses bitter criticism and hostility, all of it very unjustified. We have kept women out of the parliamentary-democratic intrigues of the past fourteen years in Germany not because we do not respect them, but because we respect them too much. We do not see the woman as inferior, but as having a different mission, a different value, than that of the man. Therefore we believed the German woman, who more than any other in the world is a woman in the best sense of the word, should use her strength and abilities in other areas than the man.”

JOSEPH GOEBBELS ON WOMEN (1933)

Living in a sexually inverted age has made this task seem insurmountable; but it is us men, and only us men of the dissident right who possess any inkling of hope in restoring the natural order. Yet still, few men in our circles firmly grasp the female question: how to secure an ideal woman and what constitutes her role within the family and greater society.

A woman’s role in society is vastly different than that of men. Not less than, but different. Their contribution to society is of equal importance, but their strong suits and weak points are not equal to that of a man’s. As the saying goes, men are from Mars (the planet associated with virility and aggression) and women are from Venus (the planet associated with love and fertility). Another way to put it, men are more “left-brained” while women are more “right-brained”.

People are generally inclined towards thinking one way over the other. If you’re analytical and methodical, you’re a left-brained person. If you’re creative and artistic, you’re a right-brained person.

The left hemisphere of the brain dominates the following abilities and aspects of our conscious mind:

• Thinking in words
• Linear thinking
• Facts Logic
• Sequencing
• Mathematics

And here are common traits of people who think more with the right hemisphere of their brain:

• Guided by Emotions
• Artistic and Creative
• Attention to context
• Visual skills
• Intuition
• Imagination
• Emotional Intelligence
• Seeing the bigger picture instead of focusing on the details
• Mood swings

As you can see, women are more right-brained than men. Obviously, there are women who are more left-brained or men who are more right-brained, but the rule generally applies to both sexes. This is why men dominate the STEM fields while women are overrepresented in professions related to childcare, customer service, and cosmetics.

Men also have larger brains and demonstrate a higher average IQ than women by about 5.0 IQ points when tested on non-verbal reasoning (problem-solving based around pictures, diagrams and shapes) according to a meta-analysis of 57 studies of general population samples.

While men tend to score slightly higher on IQ tests, women typically display greater EQ (emotional intelligence) as it pertains to empathy, particularly emotional empathy, or feeling what the other person feels. While empathy can be a useful survival trait when applied to your family and race, it can quickly become a terminal cancer if not curtailed by the more cold and calculated brain of a man. We’re seeing that today in which women and effeminate men are pushing for self-immolating immigration policies.

Naïve altruistic women make an easy host for foreign invaders and subversive parasites who seek to latch onto the breast of a nation and suck the milk of its lifeforce for their own sustenance. This is why women were barred from politics then and must be barred now before their warm embrace welcomes the death of our nations! The choice is clear: rescind women’s rights or reduce your nation to a pile of ruins!

The innate differences in men and women on a biological level are discernable and measurable. Recognition of these biological differences allows men and women to apply their strengths accordingly. But if men and women are not emotionally, intellectually, or physically the same, why have we upended every traditional gender norm? Why are men being subjugated by a humiliating gynocracy? In the same way we never should’ve made citizens and voters of blacks, but rather repatriated them back to Africa, we never should’ve made voters and politicians of women, but rather upheld them as the fertile womb of our nation. We have only ourselves to blame for not remaining resolute in our hierarchical worldview. We have become too soft-handed and flabby to maintain the natural order, so the tail is now wagging the dog. The weakest elements of society have undermined their inherent leaders, and the pyramid of power has been turned upside down.

“Looking back over the past years of Germany’s decline, we come to the frightening, nearly terrifying, conclusion that the less German men were willing to act as men in public life, the more women succumbed to the temptation to fill the role of the man. The feminization of men always leads to the masculinization of women. An age in which all great idea of virtue, of steadfastness, of hardness, and determination have been forgotten should not be surprised that the man gradually loses his leading role in life and politics and government to the woman.”

JOSEPH GOEBBELS ON WOMEN (1933)

So far, we’ve explored the general nature of women and how it contrasts with the nature of men. We’ve discussed how feminism has turned women against men and destroyed the family and thus our nations. Now let’s examine a woman’s proper role, as well as how to pursue and procure a woman.

The great irony is, those who are most alarmed by White Genocide are having the least children. This is likely due to the low agreeability and autistic tendencies of most race realists. If you’re an incel, I suggest exploring the manosphere for tips on how to approach women and develop attraction. If you’re a childless Chad, quit dicking around and get serious about settling down.

The importance of securing and impregnating a woman cannot be overstated. Our abysmal birthrate is the point upon which success or failure rests. Everything else is peripheral. The struggle we face is one of existence or extinction. Either we fight and spread our seed, or we die. Let that soak in the next time you decide to wank off instead of penetrating a flesh and blood female. Get out on the prowl and be on the lookout for the following criteria:

1. Free of tattoos and other unsightly body modifications
2. Dresses conservatively, without showing cleavage or lots of skin
3. Is either a virgin or has a low body count
4. Is free of venereal diseases and fertility issues
5. Acts ladylike (mannerly, reserved, humble, apolitical)
6. Knows how to cook and clean or is willing to learn

These days, the likelihood of finding a woman that checks all the boxes above is about as likely as finding a pot of gold at the end of a rainbow. So use your discretion here. A woman who needs a little elbow grease may have some hope if you can use your mojo to mold her into Susie homemaker. But if she’s a complete train wreck, just forget about it and move onto the next.

Your goal upon meeting a woman is to develop attraction between you and her. Your goal is not to “redpill” her. There is no need to train her to become an expert on geopolitical and socioeconomic issues. The focus should be centered on seducing her with your charm and ability to hold a conversation. All the while, you’re acquiring intel on if she can perform basic household functions and bear children. The intention here is seduction, not political instruction. It can be a real boner killer to get into deep philosophical discussions with the opposite sex. These are subjects to be pondered and debated between two competing men. Do not bring women into a man’s realm of discussion.

When it comes to conversation with women, just KISS them. Keep it simple stupid. Take H.L. Mencken’s ideal scene with a woman from his 1918 book In Defense of Women for example:

“It is the close of a busy and vexatious day—say half past five or six o’clock of a winter afternoon. I have had a cocktail or two, and am stretched out on a divan in front of a fire, smoking. At the edge of the divan, close enough for me to reach her with my hands, sits a woman not too young, but still good-looking and well dressed—above all, a woman with a soft, low-pitched, agreeable voice. As I snooze she talks—of anything, everything, all the things that women talk of: books, music, the play, men, other women. No politics. No business. No religion. No metaphysics. Nothing challenging and vexatious—but remember, she is intelligent; what she says is clearly expressed… Gradually I fall asleep—but only for an instant… then to sleep again—slowly and charmingly down that slippery hill of dreams. And then awake again, and then asleep again, and so on. I ask you seriously: could anything be more unutterably beautiful?”

You’re trying to groom a lover, not a fighter. We need to lead women back into the kitchen and nursery, not onto the battlefield. We want soft-spoken housewives and nurturing mothers, not Fuhrers with vaginas. This autistic idea that we should recruit women to the cause confirms how far we’ve descended into the excesses of egalitarianism. Any man who tries to involve women in the political sphere fundamentally misunderstands the society we’re trying to create and the role of women in that society. We know women are not simply dudes with boobs, so stop being complicit in this masculinization of women.

We as nationalists understand there are topics of discussion, as well as obligations that belong to the world of men and others that belong to the world of women. Politics and war, for example, are arenas that should be left to men. A man should see his interaction with a woman as an opportunity to destress and unwind from daily life rather than enflame tensions by pulling her into the struggle Nature herself has imposed upon us men. Small talk and whispers of sweet nothings are on the menu of acceptable dialogue between beauty and the beast. See your woman as a well-earned escape from the troubles of life, not as an opportunity to brood over them.

The irony is so many nationalist men are under the impression they need to get women on our side; that we need to make our political struggle a woman’s business. They truly believe that if we don’t appeal to women and try to convince them on the issues, we’ll never win the war. This is a leftist fallacy! Women only need a cursory understanding of basic fundamentals, so they can be better mothers, but they don’t need to study it like we do.

Just let women be women again! And part of being a woman entails being feminine and submissive to men on these matters; not becoming experts on racial theory and nationalism. Let them live in the world of small talk and trivialities. Let your woman devote her energy towards choosing the pillows, what fabric the curtains are, what color to paint the walls, and other womanly concerns. Your job is to keep her content, happy, and provided for. Don’t drag her into this nightmare that we as men have been forced to fight!

In the same way you wouldn’t dictate how your wife decorates the home, she should trust your judgment on political matters and the political worldview you plan to impress upon your children. If she’s not willing to fulfill her role as a woman, and she wants to challenge you on the boundaries you govern as a man, you can remind her who’s the boss of this domain.

She doesn’t have to know anything about politics to acknowledge your authority. Besides, it’s easier to convince a woman to trust your judgment than it is to explain in elaborate detail the esoteric schemes of global elites. Save her the headache. All you need to do is reassert your male dominance in a leadership capacity, establish sexual attraction, and she will submit to your authority.

If she refuses to surrender control on these issues, then she’s not Waifu material and it’s time to hit the eject button. Don’t be a pushover by trying to placate her. A lot of guys make the mistake of trying to appease a woman by telling her everything she wants to hear, thinking it will keep their relationship on good terms. This happy wife, happy life boomer mentality is the surest way to lose a woman’s respect. Women will try to control you, but deep down they’re just testing your manhood. Subconsciously she wants a strong man, so she will test you to see if you’re a man of conviction or a pussy.

Don’t be a slave and let her follow your lead because I can assure you, having a woman who recognizes her supporting role as a wife and a mother is much more valuable than any woman who is politically active or ‘redpilled’. You can teach her basic truths, but we don’t need women to be champions of the movement. That is our job. You just need a woman to respect and desire you by being a confident and uplifting guy.

This is not to say women cannot be racially aware. They should have a vague sense of racial loyalty, but you don’t need to go any further than instilling in her a sense of love and duty to her people, which can be instilled AFTER you’ve gained her loyalty and affection. You’re not going to gain her attraction with these topics, so that’s a conversation you have after you’ve consummated your relationship. Don’t try to put the cart before the horse. Once you gain a woman’s attraction, she will follow you into the depths of hell.

Beware of any woman who is hyper-political or extremely online. Women who are hanging out in male dominated circles have either assimilated a more masculine temperament or they’re there to soak up the male attention. Actually trad women are either apolitical or intuitively acquainted with nationalist ideas. They’re not dwelling in political chatrooms, or play-acting like this stupid broad.

These e-THOTs are not looking for a monogamous relationship online either. They’re just looking for an ego boost from a flock of thirsty guys. This movement doesn’t need “fashy” right-wing girls. It needs women who are ready to pop out white babies, and that’s going to take a lot of sacrifice and commitment on their behalf. If a woman’s not doing that, and she’s instead hanging out online in overwhelmingly male political chats, my question is, what are her motives? Why is she not chitchatting with other girls, exchanging recipes or gushing about her latest crush?

While men remain egalitarian homos, more women will try to pick up the slack and assume the roles of men; but it is important to recognize that this is not a positive development. More women attention whoring on social media and insinuating themselves in male discussions means men have failed to tame their women and mold their daughters into mothers. If you find a woman on the internet and she’s not advertising a respectable business or has some other legitimate reason, tell that THOT be gone and banish her back to the kitchen!

It is, however, important to note there are exceptions to this rule when it comes to female political personalities; but they are by far the exception. As the saying goes, the exception does not disprove, but rather proves the rule. By and large, normative women will have no interest in political squabbling or right-wing activism. Those who do engage are generally tomboys. Some women may have got an extra dose of testosterone while in the womb and feel their personality doesn’t match their biology. Just be wary of the “trad” THOTs who are in it for the ego trip and the beta bucks. You can usually detect the latter by her faithful following of beta male orbiters.

While women should be shielded from the political stage and the battlefield, they can still get an education and pursue a career. Driving women out of the workforce is not only unnecessary, but impractical in this Jew-rigged economy backed by ever-inflating fiat currency. The problem isn’t women in school and the workforce per se. The problem is women being brainwashed by pop culture to prioritize careers over children. 

We can remedy this situation by enrolling our daughters in Classical Education schools free of anti-white Marxist propaganda and by petitioning for pro-natal policies which provide support for working mothers. A woman must be given the social support to bear children during her best reproductive years. A woman’s fertility begins at the age of 15, extends into her 20s, and rapidly declines in her 30s. Research has shown that a healthy 30-year-old woman has only a 20% chance of getting pregnant! So long as the conditions are met for a woman to sustain the life of our nation, she can receive a sound education and contribute to her share of the work for which she is best suited.

Men of the West, this is my appeal to reason. The biggest impediment to defeating feminism is not women. It’s the spineless cucks who can’t bring themselves to stand up to them. To the limp-wristed SIMPs, get off your knees and quit pandering to women! To the socially-awkward autists, get out of your comfort zone and start approaching women! Uncuck yourself at once and recapture your destiny as the captain of this ship. As revolutionaries, fate has enlisted us to restore the fraternal order of men and break free from this hypnotic trance of equality! And with this rekindled fire in our bellies, we will lead our women back to their rightful place – out of politics and into the home as mothers!