Duration: 3h 50min 27sec

Topics: I cover some TPUSA speechs; Shapiro blasts Carlson, Candace & others directly on the TPUSA stage; he calls out conspiratards claiming Kirk’s assassination was a conspiracy; Carlson gets on his KNEES for Islam & demands people on the right stop criticizing Islam & Muslims; it is becoming increasingly obvious that Carlson is in the pay of Qatar to simp for Islam; second half some OME & chat questions.

Duration: 2h 57min 21sec

Topics: First half I cover the JFK conspiracies; no particular bombshells but a CIA agent who believed the agency killed Kennedy was mentioned & died mysteriously six months later; we look at the claims of Vince James about Israel; the conflict between JFK & Israel over nukes is real but the other connections are embellished & unsubstantiated; the idea JFK was against the Federal Reserve is baseless; second half some OME.

Here are some of the elements that Russia is currently controlling:

The “anti-imperialist” left: These are people who I would categorize as Chomskyite leftists whose main agenda is to oppose American and Western “imperialism” and foreign policy. They cross-pollinate with the generic “anti-war”/”pro-peace” crowd. They portend to be anti-interventionist and anti-war, but that’s a farce. They’re only against Western-led wars and interventions because they’re anti-Western, and, ultimately, anti-white who push the discourse of post-colonialism and white guilt. These hypocrites fully support wars and interventions when regimes of the global east or south wage them, particularly Russia and China. Their agenda is to dismantle NATO and the American empire in order to erect an anti-white BRICS coalition empire, led by Russia and China, to dominate the globe and “punish” the West. This category includes double-speaking liars like George Galloway, Jeremy Corbyn, Abby Martin, Max Blumenthal, Patrick Henningsen, Eric Draitser, Michel Chossudovsky, James Corbett, William Blum, Glenn Greenwald, Jeremy Scahill, Amy Goodman, Chris Hedges and virtually anyone who writes for Counter-Punch and Global Research. Unsurprisingly, all of these dubious characters are fixtures on Russia’s English-language television stations pumping out their anti-Western vitriol. Some even have or have had their own shows on the RT/Sputnik network. Martin has had a show on both RT and the Venezuelan (Marxist) channel Telesur. Galloway currently has a show on Sputnik and previously on Iran’s Press TV.

Pro-Assad Groupies: This faction grew out of the Syrian civil war. It largely consists of opportunistic, attention-seeking Western women, as well as Syrian women living in the West, looking to make names for themselves by pimping pro-Assad talking points. Since Russia intervened to save the Assad regime from destruction, these groupies have come out swinging for Putin and Russia generally, siding with the Kremlin in the dispute with Ukraine. They’re also generally part of the “anti-imperialist” leftist club, ragging on about how the West is evil and how anything non-Western is benevolent and good, especially non-white socialist dictators with the exception of Putin. These frauds include Vanessa Beeley, Eva Bartlett, Mimi al-Laham (Syrian Girl), Carla Ortiz, and numerous other narcissistic females. Also Tim Anderson, a radical Marxist professor from Australia who was previously linked to a terrorist incident there, is chief among these Assad pushers, most likely in an effort to get laid with these ex-pat Syrian women running rampant in Australia.

American Libertarians: The American libertarian movement has been built up by the Kremlin because they favour total isolationism and call for a drastic reduction in US military spending. Russia Today is a major platform for US-based libertarians, and the majority of them parrot Kremlin talking points so closely that it would be a miracle if they weren’t being paid by Russia to do so. In their blind hatred of America and dislike of its foreign policy, these libertarians have jumped on the Putin cult bandwagon, pimping him as a “counter-force” against something they hate, even though the hypocrites are abandoning all of their libertarian principles to do so. The American government is far more libertarian on issues like free speech and gun rights than the totalitarian regime of Putin which jails hundreds of people a year for expressing opinions the Kremlin doesn’t like. Journalists are routinely assassinated in Russia. Some of these libertarians have cozied up to the Kremlin for opportunistic reasons so they could get more publicity selling themselves and their brand on RT. Some of these charlatans include Ron Paul, Daniel McAdams, Justin Raimondo, Scott Horton, Ryan Dawson and Adam Kokesh. In fact, Ron Paul’s underlings have direct links to pro-Kremlin NGOs based in Europe. An investigation titled “Ron Paul’s Institute for Putin’s Priorities” goes into the links.

Disgruntled Ex-US Government Employees: This group is made up of former US government employees who became disgruntled with their former employers for various reasons. This includes Sibel Edmonds (FBI), Paul Craig Roberts (former Reagan administration), Philip Giraldi (CIA), Michael Scheuer (CIA), and many others. Roberts is probably the most rabid and delusional Putin worshipper of the lot, but they all generally push the anti-US, anti-NATO line which serves the Kremlin, and never investigate Kremlin corruption, imperialism or false flags.

Shia & other opportunistic Muslims: This group consists largely of Shia Muslims who have taken up an alliance with Russia to counter their Sunni rivals in the Middle East. Shia and Sunni Muslims don’t really get along, so the opportunistic Shias have aligned themselves with Russia and China in order to gain more power and influence across the Middle East, which is mostly Sunni. Iran, Hezbollah and Assad all belong to the Shia sect of Islam. Don’t let these Shias fool you into thinking they’re the “good” Muslims as opposed to the “bad” Sunnis. Nor are they particularly principled either. During the Iraq war, many Shias backed the US invasion to topple the Sunni Saddam Hussein who kept Iraqi Shias marginalized. Iran directly aided the US invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 in order to topple the rival Sunni fundamentalist regime of the Taliban. These Shias are more than willing to work with the “great Satan” when it suits their interests. But now their interests align more with Russia, so that’s who they’re shilling for. Among the North American “truth movement” are Shia shills like Jonathan Azaziah, Mark Glenn, Sarah Abdullah, Khanverse, Kevin Barrett and other oddballs who tout Putin and Russia as saviours of their beloved Shia regimes in the Middle East. Barrett isn’t a Shia but he has ingratiated himself with the Iranian regime and its media branch Press TV, so he serves their interests. These hacks feign an anti-war stance until their Russian and Iranian paymasters enter the fray.

The “Kremlin-First” Alt-Right: Numerous prominent pundits on the alt-right have pushed a strong pro-Russia, pro-Putin line, usually relying on false and exaggerated claims of Putin’s conservatism to justify their support. The strongest Putin advocate in the alt-right is Richard Spencer who has direct personal connections to Russia and the cult of Russian-Eurasianist ideologue Alexander Dugin. Spencer’s wife, Nina Kouprianova, is Russian. She operates as a Putin bot on Twitter, has translated the works of Dugin into English and has appeared on RT television to regurgitate Kremlin spin about NATO and Ukraine. It seems that everyone Spencer has surrounded himself with tow this pro-Putin cult line, especially Mike Enoch, who marches in lock-step with Spencer in denouncing Trump whenever Trump does something contrary to Putin’s interests. Spencer doesn’t seem to get along with other alt-right pundits who don’t follow his Russian script, such as Greg Johnson. Another big Putin pusher in the alt-right is David Duke, who has his own strong links to Russia, having lived there for years. He always brags of having sold his book Jewish Supremacism in the lobby of the Russian parliament. Duke is also a major Assad groupie, as is Spencer, having been hosted in Syria in 2005 where he gave a speech. This is largely a result of the Russian loyalty, since Assad is Putin’s puppet. Elsewhere Duke has been pictured with Dugin. Matt Heimbach, the disgraced former head of the Traditionalist Workers Party, is the clearest Duginist in the alt-right, having been mentored by Dr. Matthew Raphael Johnson, a Russophilic “orthodox medievalist” academic who has spent his career promoting Russia as the saviour of the white race and Christianity. Dugin actually spoke at Heimbach’s opening party conference, and the party’s aesthetics largely mirror the symbols of Dugin’s Eurasianist movement. Alongside Heimbach in leading the Putin cucking in the alt-right is Andrew Anglin, the oddball editor of the Daily Stormer who fled the United States and is now most likely living in Russia. From the beginning, Anglin has advanced the Putin cult, using all the standard overused talking points. An investigation into Anglin noted the likelihood he was being sponsored by Russia to agitate during the 2016 US election:

Anglin hadn’t been to the polls in years, but he wasn’t going to miss a chance to vote for Trump. His absentee ballot arrived in Ohio from Krasnodar, a city in southwest Russia near the Black Sea, according to Franklin County records. That the Russian government wouldn’t know about an American inside its borders publishing a major neo-Nazi website seems improbable. Anglin worshipped Putin, and seemed like exactly the type of online agitator Russia might use to sow chaos during the U.S. election. In March, Auernheimer told Daily Stormer commenters that he was setting up the site’s forum on “a much beefier server in the Russian Federation.” Anglin would later swear on his site—“under penalty of perjury”—that he’d never taken money or direction from the Russian government.

Most alt-righters who only listen to Spencer, Anglin and Duke end up also parroting the narratives of the Putin cult because they don’t know any better. Other alt-right sources who spread Putin worship are Red Ice TV and Arktos Media. Red Ice’s second-in-command is Lana Lokteff, who has Russian roots, and thus a strong ethnic bias for Russia and Putin. Arktos has routinely promoted and printed books by Dugin.

Truthers, American “Patriots” and Alt-Lighters: Chief among the Putin shills in this category is Alex Jones, a loudmouth charlatan who takes up any position if it will earn him more viewers and money. Around 2012 Jones started pushing a pro-Putin conspiratard line, that Putin was opposing the globalists and is our saviour from the New World Order, reversing himself from years earlier when he called Putin a terrorist “demon” and “creature of the IMF.” Jones has openly embraced Alexander Dugin, and the two have cross-interviewed each other.  For years Jones has received favourable interviews on RT. This highly-embellished and kooky discourse that Putin is an anti-globalist hero has filtered down to the broader “truther” community who eat it up like chocolate cake. This community is extremely gullible. With their chronic disbelief in any mainstream news source, these fools believe any shoddy fake news website that runs under the alternative label. Others in this category include Mike Cernovich, Paul Joseph Watson and Jay Dyer. Dyer is the most clear Duginist of the lot, pushing asinine conspiracy theories depicting every terror attack and shooting in the West as a staged hoax with crisis actors, as per his KGB demoralization agenda to convince Westerners their societies are irredeemably corrupt and that their salvation lies in Russia and Putin.

Eastern Orthodox Christians: Some eastern orthodox Christians have adopted the Putin cult simply because they identify more with the Eastern variants and institutions of Christianity than Western ones. Also, conservative Christians in general were wooed by Putin’s law against “gay propaganda” to minors. These eastern orthodox Christians are akin to Muslims and Muslim converts who support various foreign Muslim governments or groups above their own countries of residence, or Western Jews who put Israel first. These Christians harbour a religious allegiance to Russia, and by extension its government, because it’s seen as the hub of the Orthodox faith. A prominent example of this is Brother Nathael Kapner, the anti-Judaic former Jew who has spread delirious pro-Putin propaganda for years. Kapner even claimed an association with the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia (ROCOR), which, like the parent church, is probably a front for the KGB. Jay Dyer is also one of these orthodox converts who carries a religious motive behind his obscene cucking for Russia and anti-Western antipathy.

Some Zionist Jews: Some rabid Zionists favour a closer alliance with Putin and Russia because Russia doesn’t care about human rights and won’t bother Israel as much about settlement building and war crimes committed in Gaza. Various articles in mainstream publications have been written outlining the common interests between Israel and Russia, and how the US is not a reliable ally for Israel any longer. A Zionist, Josh Cohen, opined in Reuters that “With the emergence of Putin, though, Israel found the closest thing to a friend it’s ever had in Moscow,” outlining Russian-Israeli common interests as such:

Israel and Russia share a common fear of terrorism, and in 2014 Putin was one of the few world leaders to support Israel’s Operation Protective Edge against Hamas, saying “I support Israel’s battle that is intended to keep its citizens protected.” In 2005, Putin became the first Russian president to ever visit Israel, visiting the Western Wall – Judaism’s holiest site – as well as Israel’s Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial, where Putin observed a moment of silence. The Russian president even reportedly purchased an apartment in Tel Aviv for his then-84-year-old Jewish German teacher. Putin returned to Israel in 2012 as the guest of honor at a state dinner and to inaugurate a monument to the Red Army soldiers who defeated Hitler in World War Two.

Another op-ed in The Week argued why “Russia should take over Israel’s defences from America,” with reasoning similar to that of Cohen. Putin’s close links with Chabad Lubavitch and crackdown on anti-Jewish speech and Holocaust revisionism within Russia also has some Jews swooning.

All of these compromised activists fall in line with the stated Duginist agenda to infiltrate and subvert anti-establishment political currents in the West, drawing them into Putin’s orbit of useful idiots. In his “Principles & Strategy for the Coming War,” Dugin openly writes of the need for Russia, as part of its multi-pronged war effort against Europe and America, to recruit a Putinist/Eurasianist fifth-column inside the West so that when the “great war” begins, Russia can activate its sleeper cell networks as internal saboteurs. Dugin wrote,

Therefore, the first task to gain victory would be real fully-fledged company to create the entirely negative, monstrous, satanic image of the United States and the West in general. Therefore, the West is a place where the devil resides. It is the center of the global capitalist tentacles. It is the matrix of ​​rotting cultural perversion and a vice grip of falsehood and cynicism, violence and hypocrisy.

Ask yourself, is this not exactly what the majority of these alt-pundits promote, both left and right, that the West is satanic and evil and that in order to redeem ourselves our civilization must first die and then be reborn (under Russian control/direction)? With the above list of Kremlinist operators in the alt-media and politics, we can observe clearly that the Dugin agenda is alive and well amongst these “dissidents.” Dugin and his Kremlin backers have largely succeeded in coopting virtually all alternative media and politics in the West, save for a few principled holdouts who caught on to the charade and oppose it.

By Brandon Martinez

On the one hand various “truthers” proclaim that al-Qaeda doesn’t exist. James Corbett even released a documentary some years ago with the title, “Al-Qaeda Doesn’t Exist.” But today their story has changed. Now a lot of these same truthers say that al-Qaeda is so dangerous that we need Russia to bomb them in Syria. Most of them support this Russian military campaign to eliminate various al-Qaeda or Isis-affiliated rebels throughout Syria. Even the non-al-Qaeda rebels are considered fair game to bomb by some of the more fanatic pro-Assad truthers. So which is it? It can’t be both. Do these groups exist or not? Are they a “manufactured threat” or are they such a huge menace that they need to be wiped out by Russia?

The incoherence of the truther narrative is comical. They’re clinging to the outdated truther narrative about the fraudulence of the “terror threat” but at the same time contend that the threat is real over in Assad’s neck of the woods. But at various points they say even some of that stuff, like the beheading videos, are fake. Even so they contend bombing Isis is good if it’s the Russians leading the campaign. Their narrative is wildly incoherent. They want to maintain that Muslims are innocent patsies who are always set-up by the West, so they’ve resorted to saying that Isis are just “paid mercenaries” under CIA mind control or masked Mossad agents. This takes the blame away from the radical Islamic ideology that drives these groups and puts it back on suited intelligence officers in the West. The poor, innocent Muslims have no responsibility or agency. They don’t make their own decisions. They’re all just hapless dupes doing someone else’s dirty work.

Overlapping geopolitical interests have caused various states (including the US and Israel, but principally the Gulf States) to tacitly enable Isis’s rampages, but that doesn’t mean the group isn’t genuine in its stated goals to establish a Caliphate and implement Sharia law as all Islamic radicals say is their divine mission here on earth. Manipulation is not the same thing as “creation” or top-down pyramidal “control.” Even a leading Saudi cleric admitted that:

The Isis Caliphate is clearly real as this documentary shows:

The devilish Saudi regime has influence over these radical groups and can steer their direction through the funds it gives or withholds from them. The Saudi monarchs use these terrorists as tools of their jihad to purge “heretics” (Shiites, Sufis, etc.) within the Muslim world as well as to slaughter non-Muslim kaffir. But the Saudis know these deranged maniacs will eventually turn on them because the pure zealots believe Saudi Arabia itself is an illegitimate monarchy even if it has implemented some form of Sharia law. There have been numerous Isis-inspired attacks within the kingdom over the past two years. The Saudis are content to direct the most militant of the bloodthirsty beheaders that their ideology has produced into neighbouring rival states, thereby containing them within their own kingdom. But not even they can fully control it and it will eventually come back to haunt them.

Liberal “truthers” cannot face up to the fact that radical Islam is a real thing because it would put a huge dent in their flawed narrative that all evil stems from “the West.”

Commentary by Brandon Martinez

Last year London’s Muslim-Pakistani mayor Sadiq Kahn said that terrorist attacks are “part and parcel” of living in a major city. People should just “expect” these violent events to happen routinely in the modern world, he implied. What some have surmised the mayor really meant was that terror should be expected when living in a major city that has lots of Muslims living in it, like London. The other day a suicide bomber allegedly blew himself up outside a concert in the English city of Manchester, killing dozens of innocent concert-goers, mostly young teenage girls. They’re saying he was a radicalized Muslim of Libyan descent. The Islamic sect of Salafism, which fuels ISIS-type ideology, underwrites the slaughter of all infidels and advocates global domination of Islam. Not all Islamic schools of thought support these radical beliefs, but there is enough in the Koran and Hadiths for these maniacs to latch onto in order to justify their barbarism.

As London’s first Muslim mayor, Khan has been busily promoting immigration and refugee settlement of his co-religionists to the city. He was a prominent voice against Brexit and launched the #Londonisopen campaign to supposedly reassure “the more than one million foreign nationals who live in London that they will always be welcome, and that any form of discrimination will not be tolerated.” Khan is an open-borders globalist who wants to drown Britain in a sea of strange foreigners, turning not only London but the whole country into a squatting zone for refugees and assorted vagabonds from the Third World. Khan is the perfect Muslim screen for the Jewish elites to implement their agenda. Right now the interests of Muslims and Jews somewhat overlap in Europe as the continent moves towards nationalism and populism, so expect more sinister collaboration between the two groups.

For some time now, Britain has been pursuing a berserk dual-policy of permitting millions of Muslim and Arab immigrants to enter the country, whilst concurrently involving itself in various wars, squabbles and conflicts in the Middle East where those immigrants have strong roots and attachments. In doing so Britain has opened itself up to terrorism. When you engage your military forces abroad and then import hordes of the foreign group you’re occupying, you can only expect some of them will retaliate on the home-front. And that’s what has happened. If Britain wants to end terrorism, it should pull out its forces from the Middle East and repatriate all the immigrants from that region it has brought in over the past decade.

But the globalists currently in charge of the British government won’t do that because their goal is precisely to lessen the population of native Brits and increase the population of brown foreigners. Whether that’s accomplished through a terrorist detonating outside of a concert packed with British teens in Manchester or through a steady non-white immigration flow to Britain’s major cities, the globalist mission to erase the identity of Europe moves forward. The less white people, the better, in the minds of globalists, cultural marxists and their Jewish-Zionist overlords.

Commentary by Brandon Martinez

A demented clique of “truther” Muslims and their leftist foot-soldiers are jihading against me on Twitter, allegedly for my “betrayal” (rather disillusionment) of their social justice cause to “save the world” and utopian fantasy of permanently ending war. Between the years 2014 and 2016 my writing was heavily focused on issues like US foreign policy, the Israel-Palestine conflict and other subjects that cater to Muslim sensibilities. I was, at that time, effectively a sabbath kaffir writing propaganda for Muslims and Arabs. I wrote for and gave interviews to mostly Middle Eastern publications. Some of it was accurate, but I wouldn’t stand by all of it today. This focus of mine attracted numerous Muslims and leftists to my writing. During that time I would often jump the gun and declare any terrorism involving Muslims “staged” within days without sufficient proof or research – part of the cognitive anti-war reflex to “debunk” anything that could possibly lead to conflict. Recognizing my error, I’ve since corrected that misguided tendency of mine. After coming across new evidence that contradicted what I believed before, I’ve changed my position accordingly on some of these events. That’s what honest people do; they don’t just indefinitely hold to a position no matter what.

I’ve also realized the folly in obsessing about issues like false flags. My critics among this group of Muslims, leftists and conspiracy hobbyists have no argument against what I’m saying now, and simply drudge up something I said a year ago, as if to say, “look what you were saying then, it’s different from what you’re saying now, therefore you’re a shill.” These imbeciles believe that dogmatically sticking to a position despite encountering new information and evidence to the contrary makes you “credible”? No, that makes you a hard-headed and deluded ideologue who cannot admit your mistakes.

What it all comes down to here is that these Muslims viewed me as a powerful asset for their Semitic agenda when I was focusing on issues that they care about (Middle East, Palestine, wars). But now that I’ve moved on from that dead-end and shifted my focus to more pressing matters relating to the Zionist/Globalist war against Europe and White men in particular, an agenda in which Muslims are quintessential useful idiots for the elite, they feel let down and are now engaged in some kind of Islamic shaming ritual. Now that I have no inhibitions not to criticize Muslims and Islam when it’s called for, they’ve embarked on a lame social media jihad against me for rebuking their co-religionists ransacking Europe. I detailed the mentality and agenda of these Muslim “truthers” in the video below.

https://vimeo.com/217642960

Their agenda is to make Muslims appear to be harmless innocent patsies that can do no wrong in the hopes of bringing more Muslims to the West to further their religious mission to Islamicize the world for Allah. That’s why they set out to “prove” every act of violence by Muslims is a “false flag.” They’re also operating on the dogmatic religious assumption that Islam and Muslims are morally perfect, therefore any Muslim who does wrong is not acting in the name of Islam but some external factor, or was simply framed by evil non-Muslims looking to sully the religion. They’ve aligned with and are aided in this agenda by fanatical anti-war leftists who see and hear no evil beyond what they can pin on “the West”.

Kevin Barrett, for example, describes his activities as a “truth jihad”. A White American convert to Islam, all he does is write skewed propaganda to exonerate Muslims whenever they are involved in acts of violence or terror. He clings onto the most shoddy and dubious “evidence” to declare an event totally staged. He has an agenda – an Islamic one. He admitted in a debate with me that he actually wants to re-establish an Islamic caliphate, letting slip his desire to see the West itself come under Islamic leadership too. On top of that, during the debate he forwarded with vigour an extreme discourse of White guilt, virtually approving of George Soros’ messianic quest to achieve White genocide. That’s what drives these Muslim “truthers”: an Islamic nostalgia for the caliphate and global Muslim rule. That’s why they support the migrants flooding into Europe, hoping to use them as missionaries for Islam in infidel territory and to eventually absorb the continent into the future caliphate. They did it once before during the Moorish invasion and occupation of Iberia, and at least some of them are endeavouring to do it again.

These “truther” Muslims will use the trick of labeling all criticism of their religion “Zionist” or “Neocon” and accuse anyone critiquing them of supporting Israel. This is an idiotic ploy to silence criticism of their culture in much the same way that Zionist Jews beat down their critics with accusations of anti-Semitism. One can easily be critical of both Israel/Judaism and Islam at the same time. That’s actually being consistent because Islam is, at least partially, derived from Judaism. Many concepts in Judaism and Islam are similar, and both cultures harbour hostile attitudes towards those outside the faith. Both cultures are authoritarian and intolerant of free speech, ultimately seeking to dominate the Goyim and Kaffir nations of disbelievers. Islam is an Abrahamic faith and Jews are revered in Islam as a “people of the book”.

These people use the Muslim/Arab conflict with Jews over Palestine to make Muslims and Islam look like the frontier of resistance to Jewish power. But when you look at other areas like mass immigration and the culture war against the West, Jews and Muslims have formed alliances to weaken and subdue indigenous Whites under a backwards Semitic tyranny. Historically, Jews and Muslims have worked closely together to besiege their common foe: Christian Europeans. So don’t let these Muslims fool you into thinking they are front-line opponents of Jewish power agendas when in fact they happily collaborate if it suits their religious/ethnic interest to do so.

This particular clique of largely anonymous social justice warriors congregate on Twitter. Most of them eventually blocked me because they failed so miserably at forming an actual argument. They’re so kooky that they say virtually anyone who doesn’t prioritize pro-Palestine and 9/11 truth activism (issues only Muslims and leftists still care about) is a “shill”; anyone who voices the slightest criticism of Islam is a “neocon”; anyone not being a busy-body sleuthing out the latest “false flag” must work for the CIA or Benjamin Netanyahu. These fringe lunatics are reenacting the “They Live” movie, thinking they have some special anti-spook glasses that enables them to spot covert “shills” and “agents,” which amounts to anyone not dedicating their life to some futile social justice cause to remedy the unfortunate situation some Middle Easterners find themselves in. If these Muslim and leftist nut jobs were serious then they would go get themselves rifles and head over to the Middle East to fight for the causes they claim to believe in. Instead, like total losers, they aimlessly Tweet up a storm to no effect whatsoever.