Duration: 2h 21min 47sec

Topics: Emmet Connor joins to discuss Ireland under Marxism; Marxism not Zionism is the dominant ideology in Ireland; the Irish government is pro-Palestine; J-trappers can’t cope with this fact; second half we respond to chat questions.

Duration: 2h 47min 16sec

Topics: Spanish leftists are hell-bent on destroying Spain; Yolanda Diaz introduces new measure to force private companies to pander to LGBT employees; Pedro Sanchez pledges to open Spain’s borders to more migrants & pledges allegiance to the “open society”; second half some banter on OME.

Here’s the full thing:

I don’t know much about the guy he’s debating, Drew Pavlou, but he did a great job picking Hinkle’s stupid talking points apart and gave a good background on how Russia used operatives like Igor Girkin to stoke up a separatist rebellion in Eastern Ukraine immediately after Yanukovich was pushed out of power. He gave the backdrop of the Russian elite’s plans to exterminate the Ukrainian identity from existence, citing Dugin and others in their calls for the genocide.

All Hinkle could fall back on was the “coup” narrative of 2014, as if that somehow justifies the current bloodbath Putin is raining down on Ukraine. Even that claim is dubious and propagandistic because the 2014 Euromaidan revolution was not a coup in the traditional sense because it was not carried out by a small political faction, but by the people from the streets, and it resulted in two elections afterwards which you would not see in a traditional coup.

A genuine coup is always followed up by a dictatorship (like you saw Al-Sisi do in Egypt) so the coup plotters could guarantee their power. They would not hold free elections after a “coup” because they could lose those elections, let alone allow pro-Russian political parties to run in those elections all the way up until Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022.

Why would an anti-Russian coup faction allow pro-Russian parties to exist? Viktor Medvedchuk, the businessman behind the For Life pro-Russian party in Ukraine, was allowed to operate freely in Ukraine all of the years during Putin’s pro-Russian separatist insurgency. He was only arrested in 2022 when the war started.

Pavlou even took Hinkle to task for being a stupid pawn for Russian oligarchs who awarded him with a Russian mail order bride:

Hinkle is a mercenary opportunist who has monetized the war in Ukraine to sell Z-themed merch as he shills for the extermination of a European people. The commie bastard morphs into a capitalist profiteer when it benefits his bottom line and alt-media career as a bloviating mouthpiece for the Russian state.

If you enjoyed this content consider making a small contribution or becoming a member.

By Brandon Martinez

Globe-trotting Social Justice Warrior and dictator-groupie Eva Bartlett has surfaced in North Korea, showing her “solidarity” with the Kim Jung-Un dictatorship by waving around that country’s flag like a silly schoolgirl. She’s been posting weird virtue-signalling pics of North Korean women and children on her blog in efforts to glorify the country and its regime. Yeah, you can find smiling children in every country, including the worst hell-holes on earth. That proves absolutely nothing.

Last year I became increasingly critical of these fake leftist journalists who went touring around the third world looking for oppressed brown people to support against the “white man’s imperialism.” I predicted Bartlett would start shilling for North Korea at some point if that country came under any pressure from the US. And boy was I right. She’s now running around the Hermit Kingdom snapping photos of the “worker’s paradise” in defiance of “US aggression.” I wrote this in a December 2016 blog post:

Where will her [Bartlett’s] social justice crusade take her next? Perhaps to Africa, where there are no shortage of despotic regimes looking for sympathetic, self-hating whites to take up their cause. Or perhaps she’ll head over to fun-loving North Korea, if ever that regime runs into serious troubles with the West, where Bartlett will doubtlessly take up a prestigious post in Kim Jung-un’s propaganda ministry.

Of course, the hypocrite she is, Bartlett says nothing about the wild threats and provocative behaviour of Kim Jung-Un who just test-fired a missile over Japan. How is that not aggression? Bartlett and other radical leftists are notorious apologists for war and aggression when it’s waged by their favourite dictatorships in the third world, especially ones that identify in some way with communism or socialism.

These idiots have also been shilling hard for Venezuelan socialist strong man Nicolas Maduro’s savage crackdown on protestors and opposition.

Most of these leftist journalists are self-hating white women who endeavour to illustrate their self-hate by kissing up to non-white dictators. It’s such a weird phenomenon. They have a “thing” for powerful non-white strong-men who “stand up to the West” in some way. It’s like they’re living out some revenge fantasy against the white race. They’re like rebellious teenage girls who start dating black men to piss off their “racist” parents.

This stupid Australian communist professor Tim Anderson also attended the boot-licking homage trip to North Korea with Bartlett, openly praising the regime. He and Bartlett were previously on a full-time mission to keep Assad in power in Syria. Then they shifted focus to Venezuela and now to North Korea. That’s the typical commie human shield circuit.

Why won’t these Marxist fools just live in North Korea with their hero Kim Jung-Un instead of parasitizing off the West while soliciting its downfall and propagandizing for its enemies?

Commentary By Brandon Martinez

Committed 9/11 truthers take umbrage at my saying that 9/11 is increasingly irrelevant to modern events, and that “exposing” the truth about 9/11 changes essentially nothing about the current reality. Here are my queries for them:

1) With the rapid growth of ISIS and other Islamic terror groups, the emphasis of 9/11 truth that the “threat” of Islamic terror is manufactured/staged/faked is now inaccurate. Whatever truth there was in that claim 17 years ago when those groups were weak, it’s not true today. So then what is the ultimate purpose of 9/11 truth when its central premise, that the “terror threat” is entirely fabricated by governments, is belied by modern developments? These truthers have to maintain that all Islamic-related terrorism since 9/11 has also been faked, or else they risk losing relevance. But their narrative is a convoluted mess, and comes apart when they get into the Syria issue, where they, for the most part, propagandize for Assad against his Islamist opponents. So they’ve resorted to saying that the terror threat is real “over there” but is still somehow fake “over here” despite the fact that thousands of Western Muslims support ISIS and have joined their fight.

2) If ISIS, al-Qaeda and Islamism in general is a threat to some nations in the mid-east, then how is it not also a threat to Western nations internally with millions of Muslims living here? Why does the threat become “real” when you leave the terrain of the Western hemisphere, but magically ceases being a threat in our countries? The propaganda of those groups is only a google search away and it is reaching people in the West. If you believe groups like ISIS are a real threat in some countries, like Syria, Iraq, etc., then explain the necessity of 9/11 truth. 9/11 truth was designed to debunk the “threat” and say it’s either minuscule or non-existent. But the threat is now real. So proving 9/11 was an inside job changes essentially nothing about the current situation.

3) Embracing the latest cause du jour, some 9/11 truthers have morphed into war-time propagandists for the Assad regime. These people are now committed to writing propaganda to help legitimize Assad’s rule in Syria, thinking this is some kind of kick-in-the-balls to the New World Order. But from that perspective, 9/11 truth actually serves to undermine the case for Assad, because all it does is make al-Qaeda look less bad than they are. Assad was actually an early terror war ally of the Bush administration, happily torturing the CIA’s rendered “terror suspects” in Syrian jails. As Assad’s main armed opposition, the propagandists for the regime need al-Qaeda and Islamists generally to be discredited. So you’ll notice the more zealous Assad groupies have largely abandoned 9/11 and false-flag truth arguments when attacks are blamed on ISIS-style Islamists. However, they’re still “false-flaggers” when it comes to Syria, as they claim every war-time atrocity blamed on Assad was really the sinister handiwork of the Islamist rebels. So essentially their new position is that radical Muslims themselves are behind the big false-flags as opposed to victims of them!

3) 9/11 truth cannot even stop anything going on in the Middle East today, so those under the impression that “9/11 truth stops 9/11 wars” are deluding themselves. 9/11 was effectively only useful to kickstart one war, Afghanistan. The neocons tried but failed to link 9/11 to Saddam Hussein, so invented the WMD propaganda to justify that invasion. Every war since then required a whole new rationale, so debunking 9/11 does not prevent new wars at all. Nor will screaming “9/11 was an inside job” stop the elite from doing what they want to do anyway. What then is 9/11 truth accomplishing beyond proving that going into Afghanistan was a bad idea? But even that is fruitless because Afghanistan has now been overrun in certain parts by ISIS militants, so the rationale for being there has changed.

These truthers are schizophrenic anyway. Many of them actually support a war on terror-style policy in the Middle East, so long as it’s being led by Russia. If the plane dropping the bombs is a Russian one, it’s hailed as a liberation war, but if the jet is American it’s vilified as imperialism. What Russia is doing in Syria is no different than what NATO powers are doing in Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen and other countries by helping those regimes fight Islamist militants. These fools only oppose intervention from the US or NATO, while backing with vigor the interventionist military moves of Russia, Iran, etc.

The only utility I can see with 9/11 truth is making an anti-Zionist argument out of it. It can be used to show that Israel and Jewish neocons manipulated the event to drag the West into senseless wars for their interests. But that can be shown in myriad other ways as well. 9/11 is a very Muslim-centric issue, so those committed to it are clearly partial to Arab-Muslim interests as a whole. If you’re not a Muslim or Arab with a stake in the political future of the Middle East, it makes little sense to focus on 9/11 and related issues. But proving 9/11 was a false-flag in order to make Muslims look good does not even really work because since that time (especially over the past few years) Muslim militants have wreaked havoc all over the place racking up kill-counts that far exceed the casualties on 9/11.

How many Muslim or Arab immigrants in the West are even committed 9/11 truthers? Probably not very many. A whole lot more of them have signed up with the Cultural Marxist/Antifa crusade to dispossess whites. So why would I or any other Westerner go out of our way to shill for Muslims on terrorism, when many of them are now working with supremacist Jews against our interests today? So I must commit my life to “exposing” Zionist deceptions that have villainizied Muslims/Arabs, but they won’t lift a finger against the Zionist agenda to disfigure Europe?

Despite the fact that I think it’s a real threat nowadays, I don’t believe that there is a military solution to Islamic radicalism, as American and Russian neocons would have us believe. Therefore I don’t believe it necessary to “take on ISIS” wherever they are because they will just pop up somewhere else. The best policy for the West would be to simply remove all their forces from the Middle East and deport all known radical Muslims from Western countries. Then they should close their borders and keep out migrants from war-torn countries which are breeding grounds for these militants. The next step would be to cut off all ties with the Gulf States which originate, export and fund the ideology of radical Islam. Ties with Israel should also be severed, as Western support for that bandit state lies at the heart of Muslim resentment and animosity on a political level.

Mass immigration should be reversed and Europeans should focus our efforts on the fight against the nihilistic anti-white left and their Jewish enablers. A strong line should be taken that neocon-Zionist Jews are also a nuisance in Western nations on par with Jihadist kooks, insofar as they wish to embroil us in conflicts with quarrelsome Muslims in the Middle East. All these malcontents should be ejected from the body politic if the West is to survive into the next century.