Duration: 2:25:00

Topics: Greg Johnson joins to discuss the Iran-Israel war; we first discuss his recent conference in Europe; the overton window has shifted in favor of Remigration; Greg analyses Trump’s Iran strikes; Trump appears to be doing Israel favors but wants to avoid a full-on war with Iran; we discuss the motives of US politicians who are subservient to Israel (ideology vs money); we also touch on the pitfalls of viewing everything through the lens of Jews vs Gentiles.

Duration: 2h 47min 3sec

Topics: First half I cover Trump’s airstrikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities; they came as a surprise to many; this has emboldened Israel to step up strikes on regime targets; Iran’s response has been weak; I emphasize that this is Israel’s war not the West’s as they try to drag us into another quagmire; Netanyahu is a war-hungry schizo; second half I ask Israelis if they support the war with Iran on OME.

Duration: 3h 46min 45sec

Topic: First half I look at the first party of the Cruz-Tucker exchange; Cruz’ blind spot is Israel & makes a fool of himself pretending AIPAC is not a foreign lobby; Cruz reveals that he opposed the war in Iraq demonstrating that there are differences even among the pro-Israel hawks; Charlie Kirk has also come out against a conflict with Iran; Laura Loomer calls out Tucker for Qatar ties but not his Russia simping; I break down the false dichotomy of pro-Israel vs pro-Iran/pro-Islam & why nationalists out to be skeptical of both; second half some funny exchanges on OME.

Duration: 3h 5min 33sec

Topics: First half I cover the Cruz-Tucker interview; Tucker exposes himself once again as a Kremlin stooge; compare/contrast his softball interviews with Kremlin figures while obsessively grilling Cruz about various topics; Cruz pushed back and called Tucker out for his Russia shilling; second half I discuss with chat the truth vs fiction of 9/11 theories & some OMETV.

Duration: 2h 54min 23sec

Topics: First half I cover the latest developments in the Israel-Iran war; both sides continue lobbing missiles at the other; Israel has the advantage with a better air force; Trump signals that he may get involved directly; I cover some older stories of Israel aiding Syrian rebels & then funneling the refugees towards Europe; neither Iran nor Israel a true ally of the West; second half I ask Israelis about the Iran war on OME.

Duration: 3h 20min 2sec

Topics: First half I cover the Iran-Israel outbreak of war; Israel has struck Iranian cities; Iran has hit back with some missiles; Trump is supporting the attack & may have coordinated it all along with Netanyahu; the pro-Western stance is neutrality between these two warring Middle Eastern regimes; neither Iran nor Israel are allies of Western patriots; second half I quarrel with some Israelis on OME.

Duration: 2h 38min 54sec

Topics: Iran launches a weak response to Israel; they fired off some missiles & managed to kill one Palestinian; Vance & Walz debate was too boring to watch; second half I quarrel with some lefties on OME & speak to a based Spanish girl.

This video does a good job exposing the absurdist double standards of leftist British politician George Galloway.

Galloway is shown headlining an “anti-war” protest in 2015 when Britain was having a vote on whether to join the anti-ISIS coalition air war in Syria and Iraq. At that time Galloway and other leftists were protesting against Britain’s attempt to join that coalition to defeat ISIS. Yet strikingly, Galloway, a paid contributor to both Iran’s PressTV and Russia’s RT, came out full-stop in support of Russian and Iranian military intervention in Syria to do the exact same thing. He is quoted on his PressTV show saying he’s “not against airstrikes in Syria, only Western airstrikes.” Galloway joyously welcomed airstrikes by Russia when that country entered the conflict in 2015 on the side of Assad.

As Christopher Hitchens pointed out, Galloway is not anti-war, he’s just “on the other side of it.” Galloway backs military interventions by Russia, Iran, Hezbollah and presumably other regimes and groups so long as they’re on the side of his favourite dictators in the Middle East. Another video shows Galloway’s hypocrisy on the Arab Spring uprisings in 2011, where he supported the demonstrations against pro-Western monarchies in the Persian Gulf as well as against the pro-US Egyptian dictator Mubarak. But once the Arab Spring came to Syria, he denounced it as an evil Western plot to depose the “innocent” Assad regime. Galloway also derides oppositionists in Iran, Cuba, Russia and China as “Western agents,” backing those tyrannies with vigor.

Fastening his Maoist Commie cap to his head, Galloway sings praises of all dictatorships that are presumably of an anti-Western bent. The fact is that Galloway is a radical leftist literally in the pay of Iran and Russia as a contributor to their state propaganda channels. His stance on Syria is therefore in line with those governments who pay him to propel propaganda for their war effort. He supports Russian and Chinese expansion in the Middle East and Africa because he wishes the world to be ruled by a Russo-Sino communist empire. Anyone who disagrees with Galloway’s radical left platform will be jailed or executed in his utopian state. When will this Bolshevik be charged as a foreign spy for Russia and Iran?

By Brandon Martinez

With Iran now blaming ISIS for an attack on its parliament and a popular religious shrine, the false flag cult has come undone, exposing itself as a fraud that, like the boy who cried wolf, only yells “false flag” when the target of the attack is in the West. If this kind of attack happened in a Western country, the false flaggers would be all over it with their redundant amateur “analysis” trying to pick holes in the story. But with the attack in Iran, none of that seems to be happening. They either ignore it completely, or simply say that it’s a real attack by ISIS, but dishonestly add that ISIS are “fake Muslims” in the pay of shadowy Westerners. They won’t ask the typical “cui bono” type questions here because in this case Iran is the beneficiary, gaining world sympathy as a fellow victim of ISIS terrorism.

These cultists consider Iran to be an innocent “victim” nation under assault by the big powers, so scrutiny is never applied to its government, which was founded by a religious fundamentalist maniac who had 30,000 “dissidents” executed in one year. Interesting that they condemn other countries in the Middle East that have “collaborated” with Western powers, but sweep aside how Iran directly helped the United States overthrow the rival Taliban regime in Afghanistan in 2001, took advantage of the US invasion of Iraq to empower their Shiite proxies who had long sought to supplant Saddam Hussein (a historic foe of Iran who invaded the country in 1980), and supported the uprising against and overthrow of Libya’s Gaddafi, which they marketed as part of an “Islamic Awakening” at the time. These low-brow simpletons never call out Iran on its hypocrisy and double-dealing because that would get in the way of their current task of shilling for that regime to “avoid war,” or whatever they tell themselves to justify it.

This cognitive bias is also evident in their skewed and contradictory “analysis” of Syria. Whilst they are clearly extreme apologists for Muslims when Muslims are accused of terror against the West, they reverse themselves in the rather complex powder keg of Syria, where mainly Muslim factions are battling against the truth movement “hero” Assad. In that theater, the “truthers” claim that not only are the Muslim extremists doing all the terrorism and atrocities of the war, but they’re also behind various “false flag” attacks designed to frame the “innocent” Assad regime, which is held up as a bastion of virtue and “resistance.” So in the West these “analysts” contend radical Muslims are innocent patsies being set-up by our governments, but in Syria the narrative is exactly the opposite, where the radical Muslim rebels are portrayed as evil villains who are so dastardly and conniving that they’ve been organizing false flag massacres to frame Assad. These same people who viscerally hate the West and blame all the world’s problems on it, take the opposite line as they market Assad as a virtuous, Western-educated secularist who dresses like we do and speaks English and should thus be supported against his fundamentalist Muslim opponents. The disconnects here are stunning.

Predictably, truther scrutiny is also never applied to terror that takes place within the borders of Russia, even though most of it is usually blamed on separatist Muslims from the Caucasus. This is a case where their pro-Russian, pro-Putin bias takes precedence over their pro-Muslim bias, dusting off examples where Russia has manipulated and made scapegoats of Muslims for terror.

This is all very prototypical of politically-interested ideologues who, while falsely fronting as “truth seekers,” function as little more than emissaries propelling the propaganda of the beloved “white hat” regimes of the East. But their tricks and biases are becoming more and more apparent as time goes by.