Duration: 3:14:07

Topics: First half I comment on the Islam vs Israel false dichotomy; simpletons on both ends think you must glaze one or the other; both have issues worth calling out; the best position is Europa First; next I riff on MTG simping for Islam after entering the JQ cult; these people can’t see the bigger picture; I get into the conspiratard question & why politics is too complex for a shadow cabal to control everything; second half some OME & I riff off chat questions.

Duration: 3h 27min 51sec

Topcis: Gnostic Informant comes on to talk about Alt-Media SLOP; schizos taking over X; JQers; Christian quesiton & more!

Duration: 3h 4min 2sec

Topics: First half I run through some Nick Fuentes clips & show how he is lying by omission to run cover for liberal Christians doing the same things liberal Jews do; he refuses to put any blame on liberal Christian charities facilitating the migrant invasion because he is a salesman for Christianity & can’t allow you to think its leadership is part of the problem; I also have a look at clips from the Ye-McInnes interview from two years ago; Ye repeats a bunch of weak memes & can’t respond to a rational analysis; second half I quarrel with some leftists on OME.

Duration: 3h 8min 43sec

Topics: First half I cover the controversies surrounding the What is White debate; I show how phenotypes vary widely within European countries & all Euro nations are mixtures of the ancient European tribes; thus the race category should take precedence over the more blurry ethno category; I look at the views of some anthropologists who all included groups from the MENA region as Caucasoid; while some of these people are visibly White & Caucasoid, they are mostly culturally incompatible with Europe; second half I argue with chat about World War II, Churchill, etc.; I go into some info about how Roosevelt was not “philosemitic” & harboured some deep suspicions towards Jews; I look at how the British government passed the “White Paper” on Palestine in 1939 restricting Jewish immigration there, leading to Zionist terrorists attacking the British; that point refutes the idea that the British were “puppets” of Jews or Zionists at this time.

Duration: 3h 49min 54sec

Topics: OMETV session where I confront Jews and Israelis about their fake identity; I call out their grift as a fake ethnicity & they trip over themselves trying to explain what their identity actually is, a religion or “ethnicity”; their status as a fake minority is a political one designed to get the brownie points that all minorities get; take that away & deny their fake distinctness & there’s no more “special rights” for them.

Now it’s time to look at the LGBT cause. It’s another movement that many on the far-right love to lay at the exclusive feet of Jews, but is that accurate? The “Jews did it all” theorists usually tout memes like this from the terminally low-IQ wigger operation GDL:

Like with all of these types of memes, this is a classic case of cherry-picking Jewish liberals out of a line-up of pro-LGBT liberals and attributing the entire cause to only these people, omitting and ignoring all the others involved who aren’t Jewish. This is massively dishonest.

Firstly, if you go through the Jews on this list, virtually all of them are gay or transgender themselves. So why not make a meme that says “every aspect of the LGBT cause is pushed by gays, trannies, etc.”? There’s really no difference between a gay Jew and a gay non-Jew promoting LGBT; they’re both motivated primarily by their homosexuality. Same with trannies: they promote transsexuality because they are transsexuals or they are homosexuals who see common cause with transsexuals. Let’s look at a few.

Magnus Hirschfeld was a known cross-dressing homosexual who had gay lovers.

His main lover was Chinese LGBT activist Li Shiu Tong.

Hirschfeld cited a gay patient’s suicide due to shame as his reason for entering gay activism:

Edith Windsor was a lesbian.

Jazz Jennings is transsexual.

Abby Stein is a transsexual.

Frank Kameny was a homosexual.

Larry Brinkin is a pedophile and most likely homosexual.

Leslie Feinberg was a lesbian transsexual.

Brenda Howard was a bisexual.

James aka Jennifer Pritzker is a transsexual.

Eli Erlick is a transsexual.

George Weinberg is one of the only heterosexuals on this list.

Harvey Milk was a homosexual.

Kurt Freund is one of the only heterosexuals on this list and he married a non-Jewish woman.

Betty Berzon was a lesbian.

Fritz Klein was a bisexual.

Barney Frank is a homosexual.

Claude Cahun was a lesbian transsexual.

Dean Spade is a gay transsexual who supports the anti-Zionist “Queers Against Israeli Apartheid” group.

So as we can see here, virtually all of these people are either homosexuals or transsexuals or both. It’s the same story with non-Jewish queer activists; they are either gay or trans themselves and promote this cause for that reason. Sprinkle a few hetero “allies” in the mix. Similar to a cause like BLM where the main activists are black with some non-black “allies”.

Think about this. If these people were promoting LGBT just to “wreck society,” then why are they engaging in the lifestyle themselves, promoting it to other Jews, etc.? Wouldn’t they protect themselves and other Jews from the degeneracy that they’re promoting if it’s only designed to harm Gentiles? Why become gay or trans themselves?

It’s possible that some of these people drew some kind of inspiration from their religion or background – at best some kind of “muh minority” type of solidarity – but it’s clear that the main motivation is their sexual orientation here. The libtard Reform branch of Judaism even allows gay Jews to become clergy now. Why allow or promote that within their own group if it’s a conspiracy to weaken and pervert only Gentiles?

Later in the article I will go further into how gay Jews promote the same queerness in Israel too, which undermines the conspiracy angle.

Hirschfeld had many non-Jewish associates doing the same work

One of Hirschfeld’s early associates who he fell out with was German sexologist Albert Moll. He was born to Jewish parents but converted to Christianity and went to a Catholic school.

Hirschfeld cited a non-Jewish German gay activist named Karl Heinrich Ulrichs, who preceded his work by many years, as his main inspiration:

Ulrichs has been called a “pioneer of sexology and the modern gay rights movement” who contributed a lot to gay and trans theory:

His first five pamphlets, collected as Forschungen über das Rätsel der mannmännlichen Liebe (Studies on the Riddle of Male-Male Love), explained such love as natural and biological, summed up with the Latin phrase anima muliebris virili corpore inclusa (a female psyche confined in a male body). In these essays, Ulrichs coined various terms to describe different sexual orientations, including Urning for a man who desires men (English “Uranian”), and Dioning for one who desires women. These terms are in reference to a section of Plato’s Symposium in which two kinds of love are discussed, symbolised by an Aphrodite who is born from a male (Uranos), and an Aphrodite who is born from a female (Dione). Ulrichs also coined words for the female counterparts (Urningin and Dioningin), and for bisexuals and intersex persons.

Other early non-Jewish sexologists like Karl Friedrich Otto Westphal and Richard von Krafft-Ebing cited Ulrichs’ writings as their primary inspiration.

Krafft-Ebing used Ulrichs work to forward his own thesis on homosexuality, pushing for it to be decriminalized:

This diagnosis allowed him to advocate complete decriminalization of homosexuality, arguing that homosexuals were not responsible for their “malformation” and that homosexuality was nIn Psychopathia sexualis (1886), he defined homosexuality as an innate neuropsychopathic disorder—essentially a hereditary nervous disease.[8] This diagnosis allowed him to advocate complete decriminalization of homosexuality, arguing that homosexuals were not responsible for their “malformation” and that homosexuality was not contagious.

Hirschfeld founded the Scientific-Humanitarian Committee alongside Max Spohr (no evidence he’s Jewish), Eduard Oberg (not Jewish), and Franz Joseph von Bülow (not Jewish).

The group “aimed to undertake research to defend the rights of homosexuals and to repeal Paragraph 175, the section of the German penal code that, since 1871, had criminalized homosexuality.” Hirschfeld succeeded in that endeavor with the help of German non-Jewish feminist Helene Stöcker, Hedwig Dohm (Jewish ethnicity but parents converted to Christianity) and other German feminists.

Other members of the group were Adolf Brand (no evidence he’s Jewish), Benedict Friedländer (Jewish), Hermann von Teschenberg (transvestite, nothing on Jewishness) and Kurt Hiller (Jewish).

Hirschfeld’s group gathered 6000 signatures from prominent Germans on a petition to overturn Paragraph 175, which included these names:

Albert Einstein (Jewish), Hermann Hesse (Non-Jew), Käthe Kollwitz (Lutheran), Thomas Mann (Lutheran), Heinrich Mann (Lutheran), Rainer Maria Rilke (Non-Jew), August Bebel (Catholic), Max Brod (Jew), Karl Kautsky (Non-Jew), Stefan Zweig (Jewish), Gerhart Hauptmann (Non-Jew), Martin Buber (Jewish), Richard von Krafft-Ebing (Non-Jew), Eduard Bernstein (Jew), Emile Zola (Non-Jew) and Leo Tolstoy (Non-Jew).

The first World League conference included these speakers:

Magnus Hirschfeld (Jewish), Norman Haire (Jewish), Vera Brittain (British), Dora Russell (British), Charles Vickery Drysdale (British), Stella Browne (British), Ernst Gräfenberg (Jewish), Marie Stopes (British), M. D. Eder (Jewish), Laurence Housman (British), George Ives (British), Eden Paul (British), Alexandra Kollontai (Russian), Max Hodann (unknown), Felix Abraham (Jewish), Bernard Shaw (British), Bertrand Russell (British), Ethel Mannin (British), Harry Benjamin (raised Christian, German mother, father part-Jewish), Peter Schmidt (German), William J. Robinson (American) and Jack Flügel (German-English).

That’s a total of 22 speakers, five Jews (not including Benjamin because raised Christian, only partial ancestry).

The first elected presidents of the World League were Magnus Hirschfeld, Havelock Ellis (British) and Auguste Forel (Swiss).

Hirschfeld founded the Institute for Sexual Science with Arthur Kronfeld (Jewish) and Friedrich Wertheim (religion unknown). As you can see here, Hirschfeld’s operation was not exclusively Jewish and many non-Jews were actively involved in all of his organizations.

Other influential sexologists

Englishman Havelock Ellis was another early sexologist who studied homosexuality.

He co-wrote the first medical textbook in English on homosexuality in 1897, and also published works on a variety of sexual practices and inclinations, as well as on transgender psychology. He developed the notions of narcissism and autoeroticism, later adopted by psychoanalysis. Ellis was among the pioneering investigators of psychedelic drugs and the author of one of the first written reports to the public about an experience with mescaline, which he conducted on himself in 1896.

He also studied and promoted the idea that children can experience sexual arousal:

As noted earlier, he was a co-president of the World League of Sexual Reform alongside Hirschfeld.

Richard Linsert was a sexologist who worked for Hirschfeld’s institute. He wrote a counter-draft to the sexual criminal law of 1927. He also promoted contraception and wrote a text on male prostitution.

Friedrich Radszuweit was “a German manager, publisher, and author and LGBT activist, who was of major importance to the first homosexual movement.” He threw his entire weight behind the gay cause in Germany:

became president of the organisation Bund für Menschenrecht E.V. (BfM), which worked for the rights of gay people and for the deletion of Paragraph 175 in Germany. He started his own publishing company and published the monthly magazine Zeitschrift für Menschenrecht from 1923 to 1933. The company also published several LGBT books and homoerotic graphics.

Chinaman Li Shiu Tong was Hirschfeld’s protégé and lover who actively participated in the queer movement.

Non-Jewish German sexologist Volkmar Sigusch produced mountains of material to advance the LGBT/trans pervert agenda. He’s described widely as one of the “main thinkers behind the sexual revolution of the 1960s.” He headed the Institute for Sexual Science in Germany from 1973 to 2003.

So this freak supported porn, open marriages and “dirty” sexual immorality in the bedroom.

He wrote over 850 scientific articles and 51 books on sexual themes:

Alfred Kinsey (Christian upbringing) has been credited as one of the most influential American sexologists who helped normalize attitudes towards liberal sexual mores and homosexuality.

An article on Kinsey’s legacy described his work as an atomic bomb that destroyed the stigma around homosexuality and sex in general.

Some quotes:

“Kinsey had dropped a bombshell that ‘hits every structure of sexual morality.’”

“Kinsey represents a challenge to all who have maintained a dangerously reserved position on the teaching of sexual relations.”

“Sex will have lost its intimate personal character and will become the most casual and common of all the biological activities of the human animal.”

He has received numerous accolades from LGBT groups for his work:

The main financier of Kinsey’s research was the Christian Rockefeller family.

In 1943, the Rockefeller Foundation became interested in his research and awarded him an initial grant of US$23,000.

PBS cited Kinsey as an early milestone for LGBT/homosexual acceptance.

John Money (Christian upbringing) is another influential American sexologist who normalized transgender surgeries in the United States.

The book The Man Who Invented Gender notes Money’s immense influence on the gender identity topic:

In the 70s and 80s his “presence was ubiquitous, from interviews in mainstream magazines to numerous appearances on television and constant quotations in newspapers. His pleas for sexual liberation made him hot copy for journalists.”

Laud Humphreys was a sociologist and Christian priest who is:

noted for his research into sexual encounters between men in public bathrooms, published as Tearoom Trade (1970) and for the questions that emerged from what was overwhelmingly considered unethical research methods. He influenced generations of scholars who research issues related to sexuality and sexual identity.

A book describes him as a “Prophet of Homosexuality and Sociology” and “a pioneering and fearless sociologist, an Episcopal priest, and a civil rights, gay, and antiwar activist.”

Influential Non-Jewish LGBT Activists & Figures

There are so many non-Jewish LGBT activists, too many to count. They go right back to the beginning of the gay rights movement. Like the Jewish ones, virtually all of these people are gay, trans, bisexual or all of the above.

Heinrich Hössli was an early promoter of homosexualism. He “published the first volume of Eros: Die Männerliebe der Griechen (English: “Eros: The Male Love of the Greeks”), another defense of same-sex love.”

Anglo-American writer Christopher Isherwood was in “the heart of the Gay Liberation movement.”

Englishman Thomas Cannon wrote the earliest defense of homosexuality and pedarasty titled Ancient and Modern Pederasty Investigated and Exemplify’d (1749).

Cannon’s work has been described as “the most extensive and varied treatment of male same-sex desire in all of 18th century literature.”

Cannon is said to have collaborated with English writer John Cleland, the author of the earliest known erotic novel Fanny Hill.

English social reformer Jeremy Bentham has been credited as having advanced the first known argument for the legalization of homosexuality in Britain, calling it a “victimless crime”.

Gay liberation traces itself back to the Gentile-led French revolution.

France was the first European country to legalize same-sex intercourse in 1791. Frenchman Jean-Jacques-Régis de Cambacérès co-wrote the Napoleonic code.

Homosexual Irish playwright Oscar Wilde is said to have “paved the way for gay rights in the arts.”

His novel A Picture of Dorian Gray was one of the first to positively depict a homosexual character:

His works were “rife with homosexual imagery”.

He was later put on trial and convicted of “gross indecency for homosexual acts.”

Other queer activists have drawn inspiration from Wilde:

Queer writer Juliet Jacques, author of four books, including Trans: A Memoir, says she recalls having a poster of Wilde’s quotes on her bedroom wall in her adolescent years.

The earliest known self-defined Drag Queen was Christian-raised African-American William Dorsey Swann. He has been identified as “the first person in the United States to lead a gay resistance group and the first known person to self-identify as a ‘queen of drag’.”

In the late 1800s, Swann would organize “drag balls” and was often arrested.

A key figure to advance the homosexual cause in England was George Cecil Ives, who founded the homosexual secret society Order of Chaeronea and the British Society for the Study of Sex Psychology alongside Magnus Hirschfeld and others. Ives was a speaker at Hirschfeld’s World League conference.

Leading members of Ives’ British Society for the Study of Sex Psychology were: Edward Carpenter (non-Jew), Montague Summers (non-Jew), Stella Browne (non-Jew, a founder of the Abortion Law Reform Association), Laurence Housman (non-Jew), Havelock Ellis (non-Jew), Bernard Shaw (non-Jew), and Ernest Jones (non-Jew). So all of the main members of this group, with the exception of Hirschfeld, were non-Jews.

One member of the group, Montague Summers, portrayed himself as a “an uncompromising defender of Catholic orthodoxy” and wrote books on religious subjects. He was accused of anti-Semitism after lending credence to accusations against Jews of blood ritual sacrifices.

English poet John Addington Symonds was an “an early advocate of male love”:

supported male love (homosexuality), which he believed could include pederastic as well as egalitarian relationships, referring to it as l’amour de l’impossible (love of the impossible).[1] He also wrote much poetry inspired by his same-sex affairs.

Symonds “translated classical poetry on homoerotic themes, and wrote poems drawing on ancient Greek imagery and language such as Eudiades, which has been called ‘the most famous of his homoerotic poems’.”

American physician Charles Gilbert Chaddock is credited with “introducing the terms bisexuality, heterosexuality, and homosexuality from German into the English language.”

Hungarian journalist Karl Maria Kertbeny was an early advocate of decriminalizing homosexuality.

English socialist writer/philosopher Edward Carpenter was also influential in advocating for homosexualism. In the 1890s he “began a concerted effort to campaign against discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation” and his 1908 book The Intermediate Sex “became a foundational text of the LGBT movements of the 20th century”.

Scottish anarchist writer John Henry Mackay was another early advocate of homosexualism.

German Anna Rüling is known as the “first lesbian activist”. Her 1904 speech was the first known that addressed lesbian issues.

English lesbian writer Radclyffe Hall was one of the first to write a novel, The Well of Loneliness, that portrayed lesbian themes. She also appeared to be a transsexual who dressed in men’s clothes and called herself “John” in adulthood.

Englishman John Frederick Wolfenden chaired the Wolfenden Committee “whose report, recommending the decriminalisation of homosexuality, was published in 1957.”

Two British Labour politicians oversaw the decriminalization of homosexuality in the UK: Roy Jenkins and party leader Harold Wilson. Wilson’s tenure as Prime Minister saw radical changes across the board:

His government oversaw significant societal changes, abolishing both capital punishment and theatre censorship, partially decriminalising male homosexuality in England and Wales, relaxing the divorce laws, limiting immigration, outlawing racial discrimination, and liberalising birth control and abortion law.

They passed the Sexual Offences Act 1967 which decriminalized homosexuality. This is the list of the Wilson cabinet who oversaw all these changes. Virtually all Anglo-Saxon names with the exception of Russian-Jew Frank Soskice.

American LGBT Movement

We have gone through many of the forebearers of LGBT ideology in Europe. Some prominent ones were Jewish and many others were not. No exclusive blame there.

The American movement is the same. There have been numerous prominent Jewish homosexuals who joined the American LGBT cause like Frank Kameny, Reed Erickson, Harvey Milk and Edward Sagarin, but numerically there are many more non-Jewish activists doing the same thing from the beginning. Let’s look at some.

A PBS article on the American LGBT movement lists Henry Gerber as the earliest activist for the cause in America. He was raised Catholic.

Gerber founded The Society for Human Rights, “the nation’s first known gay organization, and Friendship and Freedom, the first known American gay publication.” An African-American priest named John T. Graves became the group’s president. The vice-president was Al Weininger. His religion/background is hard to determine. The name could be German or Jewish.

He is cited by American gay activists as the “father” of their movement.

PBS then lists Harry Hay as the next major activist who launched the:

first sustained national gay rights organization. In an attempt to change public perception of homosexuality, the Mattachine Society aims to “eliminate discrimination, derision, prejudice and bigotry,” to assimilate homosexuals into mainstream society, and to cultivate the notion of an “ethical homosexual culture.”

Hay was raised in a Christian household.

He is praised by homosexuals as a pioneer of their cause.

Hay was “influenced by the publication of the Kinsey Reports” written by Alfred Kinsey to kickstart the homophile movement. Prominent members of Hay’s Mattachine Society were Rudi Gernreich, Dale Jennings, Bob Hull, James Gruber, and Chuck Rowland. Only Gernreich can be identified as Jewish.

Hay and numerous others founded the ONE Institute to promote the cause. That group has been instrumental in normalizing and spreading LGBT lifestyles in American culture.

The original members were: Harry Hay, Antonio “Tony” Reyes, Martin Block, Dale Jennings, Merton Bird, W. Dorr Legg, Don Slater and Chuck Rowland. None of those names ring as particular Jewish.

Hay even supported the pedophile group NAMBLA.

Hay’s foundation in turn provided vital support to an analogous lesbian organization Daughters of Bilitis:

The founders of that group were non-Jewish lesbians Del Martin and Phyllis Lyon.

Both women formed the Council on Religion and the Homosexual (CRH) at Glide Memorial Methodist Church in northern California “to persuade ministers to accept homosexuals into churches. The couple used their influence to decriminalize homosexuality in the late 1960s and early 1970s.”

The group included representatives from the major Protestant denominations who worked alongside the lesbian couple to push for acceptance of gays in the church.

They were the first legally married gay union in California. The couple “participated in every pivotal moment of California’s same-sex marriage fight”.”

The Gay Liberation Front members:

I could only confirm that three of these 19 people are Jewish and that’s not all the members.

This lesbian group, of 12 leading members a few were Jewish, maybe three or four hard to tell as most of these people don’t have biographies.

Similar for this group. The only member confirmed as Jewish is Marty Robinson, but it’s possible a few others were. Same as most of these groups, a mix of Jews and Gentiles, all of whom are homosexuals.

Non-Jew Craig Rodwell was a prominent gay activist who led the Homophile Youth Movement in Neighborhoods (HYMN), set up a bookshop for LGBT literature and was a “prime mover” behind gay pride rallies in NYC.

LGBT magazine, The Advocate, was founded by Protestant minister Troy Perry. He also founded the LGBT-affirming Metropolitan Community Church.

Homosexual youth group Vanguard was started by Adrian Ravarour and Billy Garrison. Vanguard magazine founded by Jean-Paul Marat and Keith St. Claire was sponsored by Glide Church.

Drag Queen Story Hour, which organizes drag queen book readings to children at libraries, was started by feminist-lesbian Michelle Tea who was raised Catholic.

The organization is led by two Latinos: Julián Delgado Lopera and Virgie Tovar.

Tea is also an anti-Zionist.

DQSH is also sponsored by RADAR productions. These are their current directors: an obese black woman and a mixed-race transsexual.

Their writers/artists are every imaginable race:

Here is a list of the most prominent American drag queens. You can go pour through that list to find some Jews but the majority are going to be non-Jews.

The most prominent Drag Queen promoter is African-American RuPaul, who was raised Catholic.

There is a long list of African-American LGBT activists.

An NBC article lists “16 queer Black trailblazers who made history”.

From 1960s civil rights activist Bayard Rustin to Chicago’s first lesbian mayor, Lori Lightfoot, Black LGBTQ Americans have long made history with innumerable contributions to politics, art, medicine and a host of other fields.

Many American politicians with Christian backgrounds support LGBT.

Obama (Christian)

Biden (Catholic)

Elizabeth Warren (Christian)

Hillary Clinton (Christian)

I could go on and on showing the contributions of every race in America to this degenerate movement, but you get the picture.

Canada

One prominent Canadian pro-trans/LGBT sexologist is Jewish transsexual Aaron Devor.

Gerald Hannon (raised Catholic) was a pro-LGBT journalist/writer and male prostitute. He’s described as a “key figure in the [Canadian] gay rights movement”.

Here are 19 other prominent LGBT activists/supporters in Canada.

Barry D. Adam (unknown ethnicity)

The name Adam is Hebrew is origin but mostly used by non-Jews.

Enza Anderson (Non-Jew)

Florence Ashley (Non-Jew)

Alec Butler (Non-Jew)

Michelle Douglas (Non-Jew)

Jim Egan (unknown)

Brent Hawkes (Christian priest)

Alan Herbert (Jew)

George Hislop (unknown)

K.d. Lang (mixed ethnicities, minimally Jewish, practices Buddism)

Irshad Manji (Egyptian-Indian)

Christin Milloy (Non-Jew)

Arsham Parsi (Iranian)

Gordon Price (Non-Jew)

Svend Robinson (Non-Jew)

Bill Siksay (unknown, possibly Hungarian)

Clara Sorrenti (transgender streamer, Italian)

Jenna Talackova (Non-Jew)

Mark Tewksbury (Non-Jew)

Canada is the most pro-LGBT country in the world led by Justin Trudeau, the most pro-LGBT prime minister in history.

Trudeau and his father championed pro-LGBT bills like no tomorrow. They are Catholic.

Canadian churches are even starting to champion LGBT, gay marriage and trannies.

The current Trudeau cabinet is incredibly diverse and only has one identifiable Jew (Karina Gould) of 38 members.

And yes, liberal Canadian Jews also support that stuff.

British LGBT Activists

Earlier we looked at quite a few British activists, writers and sexologists who spearheaded LGBT causes in England and Europe in general. See the section “influential non-Jewish LGBT activists”. Let’s look at a few more.

A “trailblazer” for LGBT in England was non-Jew Mary Susan McIntosh.

The Independent described her as a “pioneer in feminist and gay movements.”

She dedicated her whole life to vindicating LGBT and feminism:

She had begun studying and writing about the sociology of homosexuality. Her paper “The Homosexual Role”, published in 1968, argued that homosexuality was not a clinical pathology and that historical and cultural influences affected same-sex relations, changing them in meaning and practice. Much of her work was based on questionnaires and notes of meetings with gay men interviewed in Leicester and London.

She helped to found the socialist feminist magazine Red Rag, and in 1970 became a founding member of the Gay Liberation Front, eventually working towards creating contacts between the women’s and lesbian movements. She played an active role in the campaign for women’s legal and financial independence, too, which led to the Why Be a Wife? campaign. She also became involved with other campaigns for the right to define one’s own sexuality.

Australian-born British leftist Peter Tatchell has been one of the most active LGBT promoters in the UK and around the world. He was raised Christian.

He has been involved with gay politics for decades.

Pretty much all queer activism in the UK has his name attached to it.

Here he is trying to justify pedophilia.

The works of writer Virginia Woolf are noted as “one of the first great tales of gender fluidity in the English canon”. She was an early bisexual who had affairs with women. She was not Jewish and was accused of anti-Semitism.

English diarist Anne Lister has been dubbed the “first modern lesbian”. She was Anglican.

Her published dairies detailing her lesbian exploits have “shaped and continue to shape the direction of UK Gender Studies and Women’s History.”

Prominent mathematician Alan Turing was prosecuted for homosexual acts. His name “has been at the heart of future campaigns to issue pardons and apologies to those convicted of homosexuality-related crimes”.

April Ashley “was one of the earliest British people known to have had gender confirmation surgery.” She was raised Christian.

The Gender Recognition Act 2004 “used her case as a precedent and finally saw her recognised as female in the eyes of the law.”

Nigerian-British footballer Justin Fashanu was one of the first athletes to come out as gay. He is “a figurehead for a more open and equal approach to sexuality across global sport.”

Ghanian-British Phyll Opoku-Gyimah “has been a leading voice in the Black lesbian community and is a co-founder of UK Black Pride.”

Bob Mellors.

Brit Charlie Martin is the “first transgender race car driver” who has “used her status as a prominent racing driver to raise awareness of LGBT and transgender rights.”

Chevalière d’Éon is considered “the first openly transgender person in modern European history.” Transgender group, The Beaumont Society, is named after him.

The Fabian Society is the most well-known British Marxist-Socialist group that formed the backbone of the British Left. The Labour Party was born out of the Fabian Society. Many Fabians were speakers at Magnus Hirschfeld’s World League conference. Virtually all of the founders and leaders of the Fabian Society were non-Jewish Brits.

The group was started as an offshoot of The Fellowship of the New Life, founded by Englishman Thomas Davidson.

Key Fabians were:

Sidney Webb (no religion, Christian reference found)

George Bernard Shaw (Protestant)

H. G. Wells (atheist, Christian upbringing)

Graham Wallas (raised Christian)

Charles Marson (raised Christian)

Sydney Olivier (raised Christian)

Oliver Lodge (Christian)

Ramsay MacDonald (Christian)

The Fabian website attributes early British feminism to the “pioneering efforts of several early female Fabians.”

Some of these women included:

Annie Besant (raised Christian)

Beatrice Webb (no religion, no Jewish references)

Emmeline Pankhurst (raised Christian)

Emma Brooke (British)

Charlotte Wilson (British)

A few more Fabian feminists:

A UK LGBT website lists these people as their “top 12 LGBT+ trailblazers” of 2024. No detectable Jewish names here.

Of course, among all these British Gentiles you can find liberal British Jews doing the same thing:

As always, the common denominator here is that these people – Jew or Gentile – are all homosexuals or transsexuals.

Spanish LGBT Activists

Virtually all leftists in Spain are native Spaniards.

Oriol Pamies

Ángeles Álvarez

Carla Antonelli

Irene Montero

Pablo Iglesias

Rita Maestre

Ana Redondo

Yolanda Diaz

Juan Carlos Monedero

Íñigo Errejón

Pedro Sanchez

Luis Zapatero

All of the major LGBT, feminist and trans laws were first passed by Luis Zapatero and the PSOE and new ones were pushed in by Irene Montero and Podemos and passed by PSOE.

Homosexuals and transsexuals run dozens of organizations in Spain and host a large pride parade every year.

The most leftist country in Europe is entirely led by native Spaniards.

I could go on to document every country in Europe and you’ll find this same scenario: native Europeans are leading leftism.

NAMBLA (North-American Man-Boy Love Association)

NAMBLA was the first-ever pedophile advocacy group started by a bunch of sick perverts.

Let’s look at who ran this group.

The group was founded by non-Jewish Marxist David Thorstad who was born into a “devoutly Pentecostal Norwegian-American family.”

Another prominent member was non-Jew Bill Andriette.

Of the “affiliated individuals,” two are Jewish (Ginsberg and Horowitz) and three are non-Jews (Andriette, Hay and Thorstad).

Catholic-born (atheist) feminist Camille Paglia lent her support to NAMBLA and defended pederasty.

The usual J-trap method here would be to cherry-pick Ginsberg and Horowitz out of this lineup of pedophiles and ignore the rest, but the facts show it was a mix of Christian-born and Jewish-born pedophile scum.

Another pedophile group popped up in the Netherlands called Vereniging Martijn. The only known people associated with it were Dutchman Ad van der Berg and a Christian priest.

LGBT Celebrities

Ellen Degeneres (lesbian, raised Christian)

Bruce Jenner (transsexual, non-Jew)

Bruce Jenner has become a face for transsexualism and is trying to shoehorn it into conservative circles.

Ellen Page (transsexual, non-Jew)

Page has become one of the most prolific promoters of transsexualism.

Eddie Izzard (transsexual, British)

Billy Porter (African-American, homosexual cross dresser, raised Christian)

Laverne Cox (African-American, transsexual, raised Christian)

Dylan Mulvaney (American raised Catholic, transsexual)

Mulvaney has almost become the new “face” of transsexualism promoting it everywhere he goes.

The Wachowski brothers (Matrix directors, transsexuals, Polish descent)

Nikkie de Jager (Dutch transsexual)

Here’s a list of 49 trans celebrities:

The vast majority of these people are non-Jews.

Other prominent pro-LGBT celebrities:

Madonna (raised Christian)

Madonna has been described as a “gay icon” who “has consistently been an advocate for the LGBT community throughout her career.”

Lady Gaga (raised Catholic)

Gaga has become a leading pro-LGBT activist who uses her platform and charity to push the issue.

George Clooney (raised Catholic)

Beyonce (African-American)

Miley Cyrus (raised Christian, identifies as “pansexual”)

Cyrus quit her church because they weren’t pro-LGBT.

Taylor Swift (Christian)

Swift has been noted as “a longtime ally and advocate for the LGBTQ+ community.”

Oprah Winfrey (African-American)

Anne Hathaway (raised Catholic)

Of course, you can find liberal Jewish celebrities doing the same thing:

Ruby Rose (Jewish-Australian)

Lena Dunham (mix Christian-Jewish parentage)

Pink (Jewish)

Leading Trans Activists

A list of leading trans activists gives us these names:

Most of these people are black.

Who Finances LGBT?

It is well known that Jewish-American James Pritzker funds much of the trans movement around the globe. Pritzker is himself a transsexual. That is, in my view, his main motivation. His Jewishness may be relevant, but it’s peripheral to his transsexualism.

One of the most prominent LGBT financiers are the Stryker family.

HomosexualJon Stryker founded the Arcus Foundation which has “has given more than $58.4 million to programs and organizations doing LGBT-related work between 2007 and 2010 alone, making it one of the largest LGBT funders in the world.” His sisters Ronda and Pat are also involved in gay philanthropy.

Alongside German lesbian Ise Bosch, founder of Dreilinden Fund in Germany and Irishman Michael O’Flaherty, Styker’s Arcus Foundation established MAP, “a framework for global LGBT advocacy.”

Michael O’Flaherty was an ordained Catholic priest.

Arcus works alongside NoVo, a charity founded by Warren Buffett’s son, Peter.

Jon Stryker’s religion is not reported anywhere and there is some confusion about it. The name Stryker is German. A Times of Israel article lists him as a “Jewish Democrat donor,” but no other source confirms his Jewishness that I could find. This wouldn’t be the first time a Jewish website misattributed Jewishness to a person, which was also done to Paul Volcker. The people claiming this usually cite the same source, a Veterans Today (conspiratard website) article, which calls him Jewish in the headline but doesn’t provide proof. So the jury is still out on it.

Another major LGBT financial backer is non-Jewish homosexual Tim Gill. Rolling Stone wrote a piece on Gill explaining “how Tim Gill turned a $500 million fortune into the nation’s most powerful force for LGBTQ rights.”

Liberal nutjob Joe Biden heaped praise on Gill, saying, “If not for the work of Tim Gill… there is no telling where the LGBTQ-rights movement would be.” Gill has dumped a lot of his fortune into promoting homosexuality around the world:

Gill has methodically, often stealthily, poured $422 million of his fortune into the cause of equal rights for the LGBTQ community – more than any other person in America.

Gill’s fingerprints “are on nearly every major [LGBT] victory.”

Another big funder of LGBT groups is Jewish-Hungarian billionaire George Soros. Since he is not a homosexual himself (like most of the others mentioned), his motivation is to support generic liberal and minority causes to establish an “open society” safe for minorities of all stripes. There is testimony from Soros himself that his Jewish identity plays a part in his advocacy, owed to a type of Holocaust PTSD.

So once again we see a mix of Jews and Gentiles, mostly homosexuals, funding the expansion of their sexual preference around the world.

LGBT in Israel

If the promotion of LGBT values is a “Jewish conspiracy,” one must ask, what is the goal of the conspiracy? The usual answer is that it’s all a trick to make Gentiles degenerate and morally debased so Jews can obtain some sort of dominance over them, while sustaining traditional values for themselves.

This is severally undermined by the fact that Jews are embracing these degenerate lifestyles and sexual orientations themselves, both in the West and in Israel. If they’re supposed to be shielding their own from this stuff, they’re doing a piss-poor job of it.

Numerous branches of Judaism started accepting LGBT clergy since the 1980s, ordaining gay and lesbian rabbis.

Israel has at least a dozen LGBT organizations pushing queerness, transsexuality and all the rest of the rot in Israel.

Tel Aviv hosts one of the largest gay pride rallies every year.

Same-sex unions are not legal in Israel but are recognized if performed in a different country.

There are evidently trans Jews in Israel.

They are doing trans surgeries in Israel.

Israel is now allowing transsexuals to change their gender on ID cards without surgery.

Organized transsexuals in Israel lobbied for this.

Gay Jewish pornographer Michael Lucas has shot gay pornos in Israel and organized trips for homosexuals to visit the country.

The question is, why are Jewish homosexuals like Michael Lucas and others pushing their perversity in Israel if the goal is to only promote it among non-Jews? The simple answer is that these Jewish homosexuals and transsexuals (like Gentile ones) support this stuff across the board – for Jews and Gentiles – which weakens the malicious conspiracy claim. They are indeed weird perverts but are consistently pushing the same stuff onto other Jews.

Examples of Anti-LGBT Jews

One thing I see people citing is this idea that there are “eight genders in the Talmud” and they try to link that to modern transsexualism. This meme has made the rounds. It’s based exclusively on an op-ed written by Jewish transsexual rabbi Elliot Kukla in the New York Times. So once again, we see a transsexual trying to shoehorn her gender confusion into her religion in order to expand its acceptance.

The problem with this is that other Jews have rebutted her claims, saying that the Torah and Talmud only speak of two unique genders and other states of being that aren’t genders. I’m sure the Talmud contains some nasty stuff, but this particular claim appears to be false.

Jewish conservative Ben Shapiro chimed in.

The Old Testament (Torah) notoriously proscribes homosexuality as a sin, let alone endorses transgenderism.

Some Orthodox Jews seem to take those verses literally.

Orthodox religious Jews in Israel are much more conservative on the issue.

Religious conservatives in Israel are no fans of LGBT.

American Jews in particular are largely on the liberal side of politics (it’s about a 70-30 lib-conservative ratio) due to various factors, similar to American blacks. Both groups seem to have a “persecution complex” as minorities and that plays into their identification with liberal-leftist causes. But there are notable exceptions.

Ben Shapiro

Shapiro is a prominent Jewish conservative who has come out against abortion, pornography, transsexualism and Marxist “White privilege” theories. He co-founded the Daily Wire with Christian Jeremy Boering. Other DR hosts include Catholic Matt Walsh who has called out the demographic replacement of Whites.

Andrew Klavan

Klavan is ethnically Jewish but converted to Christianity. He is another Daily Wire host and has similar positions to Shapiro on social issues.

David Horowitz

Horowitz is a former communist who became a staunch critic of the Left. He is more on the neoconservative side but is also against most of the left’s social positions and groups like BLM.

Dennis Prager

Prager founded PragerU which produces conservative content. He is on the softer side of conservatism but opposes most of the extreme positions of the Left like radical feminism, radical LGBT politics, DEI, BLM, etc. He often defends Christianity.

Judith Reisman

Riesman was the most prolific conservative academic critic of Alfred Kinsey’s sex teachings. She was a “crusader against pornography” and Hugh Hufner’s “greatest living foe.”

Her work exposing Kinsey and the porn mags ignited an anti-pornography movement that led to President Reagan announcing the launch in May 1985 of what became known as the Meese Commission on Pornography.

LibsOfTikTok (Chaya Raichik)

LibsOfTikTok is the most prominent anti-trans/anti-LGBT account on X that has been crusading against queer and leftist extremism for years. It is run by Chaya Raichik who is an Orthodox Jew. Here she is being questioned about her anti-trans stance by non-Jewish leftist jouro Taylor Lorenz:

Laura Loomer

Loomer is a fanatical Trump supporter and Jewish Republican. She generally aligns with most conservative social views (anti-BLM, anti-trans, anti-feminism, etc.) and has even defended White identity politics and spoken at White nationalist conference AmRen.

Yoram Hazony

Hazony is a religious Israeli conservative who founded the National Conservatism conference that hosts right-wing populists at their events. He generally aligns with figures like Trump, Orban, Ron DeSantis, etc. He wrote a book called The Virtue of Nationalism defending the nation-state idea and ethno-centrism of nations.

Paul Gottfried

Gottfried is an influential Jewish paleoconservative and has been described as the “godfather” of the Alt-Right. He has most of the same views as someone like Pat Buchanan.

Mark Levin

Levin is a Jewish conservative pundit on Fox News who generally opposes all the radical left stuff and supports Donald Trump. He wrote a book on American Marxism.

Michael Levin

Levin is a Jewish-American race realist who wrote the book Why Race Matters defending the main arguments of race realism. He was a speaker at numerous AmRen conferences.

Michael Savage

Jewish conservative talk radio host who veered into some paleoconservative territory, including pro-White takes. He “summarized his political philosophy in three words: borders, language, and culture.”

Eric Zemmour

Zemmour is a French journalist and pundit who is probably the most outspoken Jewish conservative on the issue of demographic replacement of White Europeans. He has popularized the Great Replacement knowledge in France and is extremely pro-French and pro-West. He ran for office on the ticket of remigrating non-French, particularly Muslim, immigrants back to their countries.

Jewish billionaire Joseph Edelman funds a conservative anti-trans group:

Hedge fund CEO and billionaire biotech investor Joseph Edelman and his wife provided a $1 million donation to help launch Do No Harm, a new conservative advocacy group pushing anti-trans legislation in statehouses across the country, HuffPost has found.

Conclusion

In no way am I “defending” any of the people mentioned here. I am a social conservative opposed to the LGBT/trans pervert agenda, so obviously I disagree with all of the LGBT people mentioned and think they’re wackos. But that’s not the point of this article. Nor am I suggesting that “Christians” are exclusively to blame for this issue either.

The point is that the protagonists of the LGBT cause are homosexuals and transsexuals and their leftist fellow travelers of different backgrounds; just like the protagonists of feminism are women. No single group is to blame for this. These people are motivated by their sexuality more so than anything else, so obsessing about their ethnicity or religion seems to me to be a red herring.

That doesn’t mean that some Jewish leftists aren’t supporting this for peculiar Jewish reasons – like “minority mentality,” “persecution solidarity,” etc. – but the clearest factor in the politics of LGBT activists is their homosexualism, transsexualism, etc. Getting too caught up in the particular ethnicities of these people is a distraction from the main issue. And as we’ve seen, there is no single ethnicity promoting these deranged ideologies.

Subscribe now

Share

If you enjoyed the article, please consider a donation.

Duration: 2h 34min 51sec

Topics: First half I cover Ye’s latest retadations; he trots his wife naked at an event; then he sells a Swastika t-shirt & declares himself a Nazi among other schizophrenic ramblings once again; grifters jump back on the bandwagon exploiting mental illness for clout; second half I run into various cholos & Indians on OME.

The people who push the “Jews only” or “Jews mainly” explanation of feminism (or any other left-wing phenomenon really) are either Christians who want to hide the role of Christians in it, or they are dupes who have fallen for cherry-picked memes like this one, produced by dimwits who think fishing a handful of Jewish names out of a pool of hundreds of feminists is proof of a conspiracy while ignoring all the others.

By saying “every single aspect” of X is Jewish, they are implying that there are no non-Jews doing the same thing and promoting the same ideas. This is categorically false in every case, no matter what issue you look at.

Let’s look at early feminism.

Early feminism in the West was not particularly Jewish, no matter which country we look at. The meme cherry picks Jewish feminists mostly from the second wave of the movement, and lists only one early Jewish suffragette of the first wave, Ernestine Rose, who “had renounced Judaism at an early age and was an active atheist.” But of course the memers leave out a whole ton of non-Jewish suffragettes who led the movement.

America

The earliest American feminist was Christian Abigail Adams, the wife of second US President John Adams:

One of the earliest women’s rights groups was the “Woman’s Christian Temperance Union”:

The two biggest names in the early suffragette movement in America were Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony, both Christian women.

Elizabeth Cady Stanton (née Cady; November 12, 1815 – October 26, 1902) was an American writer and activist who was a leader of the women’s rights movement in the U.S. during the mid- to late-19th century. She was the main force behind the 1848 Seneca Falls Convention, the first convention to be called for the sole purpose of discussing women’s rights, and was the primary author of its Declaration of Sentiments. Her demand for women’s right to vote generated a controversy at the convention but quickly became a central tenet of the women’s movement.[1] She was also active in other social reform activities, especially abolitionism. In 1851, she met Susan B. Anthony and formed a decades-long partnership that was crucial to the development of the women’s rights movement. During the American Civil War, they established the Women’s Loyal National League to campaign for the abolition of slavery, and they led it in the largest petition drive in U.S. history up to that time. They started a newspaper called The Revolution in 1868 to work for women’s rights. After the war, Stanton and Anthony were the main organizers of the American Equal Rights Association, which campaigned for equal rights for both African Americans and women, especially the right of suffrage. When the Fifteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was introduced that would provide suffrage for black men only, they opposed it, insisting that suffrage should be extended to all African Americans and all women at the same time.

That 1848 feminist conference was held in a Christian church:

First wave feminism is thought to have officially started in 1848, during the first women’s rights convention at Seneca Falls, New York. 300 women and men met in the basement of a Wesleyan Methodist church and signed Elizabeth Cady Stanton’s Declaration of Sentiments, publicly declaring their belief in the legal equality of women to men.

So these two Christian women established all the important organizations of early American feminism, convened the first feminist congress and wrote foundational documents like “Declaration of Sentiments”. On Anthony’s influence:

After the war, they initiated the American Equal Rights Association, which campaigned for equal rights for both women and African Americans. They began publishing a women’s rights newspaper in 1868 called The Revolution. A year later, they founded the National Woman Suffrage Association as part of a split in the women’s movement. The split was formally healed in 1890 when their organization merged with the rival American Woman Suffrage Association to form the National American Woman Suffrage Association, with Anthony as its key force.

They founded feminist newspapers and groups and also supported black rights.

Another big name: Matilda Joslyn Gage.

Gage was considered to be more radical than either Susan B. Anthony or Elizabeth Cady Stanton (with whom she wrote History of Woman Suffrage,[24] and Declaration of the Rights of Women). …She served as president of the National Woman Suffrage Association (NWSA) from 1875 to 1876 and served as either Chair of the Executive Committee or Vice President for over twenty years. …In 1870, Gage published a pamphlet called Woman as an Inventor.[9] The pamphlet was described as ‘Woman Suffrage Tracts – No. 1’ and was published by the New York State Woman Suffrage Association, which Gage helped to found.[10] In 1883, Gage published a similar essay called Woman as an Inventor in the North American Review.[11] In both pamphlets, Gage argued that women were already competent inventors and supported her argument by citing examples of women inventors.

Another big one who inspired both Stanton and Anthony was Lucy Stone, also Christian:

Stone wrote, extensively, about a wide range of women’s rights, publishing and distributing speeches by herself and others, and convention proceedings. In the long-running and influential[4] Woman’s Journal, a weekly periodical that she founded and promoted, Stone aired both her own and differing views about women’s rights. Called “the orator”,[5] the “morning star,”[6] and the “heart and soul”[7] of the women’s rights movement, Stone influenced Susan B. Anthony to take up the cause of women’s suffrage.[8] Elizabeth Cady Stanton wrote that “Lucy Stone was the first person by whom the heart of the American public was deeply stirred on the woman question.”[9] Together, Anthony, Stanton, and Stone have been called the 19th-century “triumvirate” of women’s suffrage and feminism.

Stone founded the American Woman Suffrage Association:

Francis Wright:

In the late 1820s, Wright was among the first women in America to speak publicly about politics and social reform before gatherings of both men and women.[1] She advocated universal education, the emancipation of slaves, birth control, equal rights, sexual freedom, legal rights for married women, and liberal divorce laws. Wright was also vocal in her opposition to organized religion and capital punishment. The clergy and the press harshly criticized Wright’s radical views. Her public lectures in the United States led to the establishment of Fanny Wright societies.

The Grimké sisters:

Antoinette Brown Blackwell:

Harriet Taylor Upton:

A big supporter and funder of women’s suffrage was wealthy socialite Alva Belmont:

She was inspired to take up the cause after hearing a lecture by Ida Husted Harper.

Another wealthy backer of suffrage was Phoebe Hearst, a Christian who converted to the Baha’i faith:

Other Christian (or otherwise non-Jewish) leaders of American feminism: Carrie Chapman Catt, Ida Husted Harper, Lucretia Mott, Frances Ellen Watkins Harper, Frederick Douglass, Martha Wright, Betsy Mix Cowles, Jane Hunt, Mary Ann M’Clintock, Hannah M. Darlington, Lydia Maria Child, Frances Dana Barker Gage, James Mott, Ann Preston, Abby Kelley Foster, Paulina Wright Davis, Anna Howard Shaw and many more.

Here are the 100 signatories of Elizabeth Stanton’s Declaration of Sentiments:

Virtually all Anglo-Saxon, Celtic, Germanic and French names and a plethora of Quakers. You can look at the Seneca Falls Convention in 1848, the Ohio Women’s Convention at Salem in 1850, the Pennsylvania Woman’s Convention at West Chester in 1852 and other similar conventions of the day, and you’ll see mostly Christian women at the helm.

Virginia Minor and her husband Francis Minor were among the first to attempt to legally overturn the ban on women’s voting rights:

Christians Alice Paul and Lucy Burns led the campaign for the 19th Amendment (women’s vote) and then started the National Women’s Party:

Alice Stokes Paul (January 11, 1885 – July 9, 1977) was an American Quaker, suffragette, suffragist, feminist, and women’s rights activist, and one of the foremost leaders and strategists of the campaign for the Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which prohibits sex discrimination in the right to vote. Paul initiated, and along with Lucy Burns and others, strategized events such as the Woman Suffrage Procession and the Silent Sentinels, which were part of the successful campaign that resulted in the amendment’s passage in August 1920.[1]

After 1920, Paul spent a half-century as leader of the National Woman’s Party, which fought for the Equal Rights Amendment, written by Paul and Crystal Eastman, to secure constitutional equality for women. She won a major permanent success with the inclusion of women as a group protected against discrimination by the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Other important women in the National Women’s Party were Mabel Vernon and Anne Henrietta Martin.

This website lists 20 important American suffragette activists, virtually none appear to be Jewish:

The abolitionist anti-slavery movement was also led by American Quakers.

It isn’t until the second wave of American feminism that Jewish women start to take a more prominent role. Jewish websites, as they often do, like to boast of the role of Jews in various things as if to present themselves as a particularly enlightened “moral” group showing others the way.

This is part of their Tikkun Olam/social justice ideology embedded in the religion. But even in these cases, they tend to embellish their own importance by ignoring all the prominent non-Jews doing the same thing, which is ironically what the Neo-Nazis also do from the opposite angle. Both want to portray Jews as either especially good or especially evil.

Some of the prominent Jewish feminists of the second wave were Betty Friedan, Andrea Dworkin, Gloria Steinem, Naomi Wolf and others. Of course, they were not alone and had plenty of help from non-Jewish feminists.

Wiki has 42 entries for “Jewish-American Feminists” meanwhile it has 163 entries for “African-American feminists” and 10 for “Asian-American feminists”. That’s not including all the White non-Jewish feminists, which there is not a specific page for.

A magazine listed 37 influential women with feminist tendencies which includes these people:

1. The Suffragettes (mostly Christian)
2. Simone de Beauvoir (French Gentile)
3. Eleanor Roosevelt (American Gentile)
4. Marlene Dietrich (German-American Gentile)
5. Betty Friedan (Jewish-American)
6. Gloria Steinem (Jewish-American)
7. Angela Davis (African-American)
8. Bell Hooks (African-American)
9. Barbara Walters (Jewish-American)
10. Coretta Scott King (African-American)
11. Maya Angelou (African-American)
12. Audre Lorde (African-American)
13. Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Jewish-American)
14. Yoko Ono (Japanese)
15. Alice Walker (African-American)
16. Hillary Clinton (American Gentile)
17. Oprah Winfrey (African-American)
18. Diane Von Furstenberg (Jewish)
19. Madonna (American Gentile)
20. Sheryl Sandberg (Jewish-American)
21. Malala Yousafzai (Muslim)
22. Angelina Jolie (American Gentile)
23. Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie (Nigerian)
24. Beyoncé (African-American)
25. Roxane Gay (Haitian-American)
26. Janet Mock (African-American/mixed race)
27. Emma Watson (British Gentile)
28. Patrisse Cullors (African-American)
29. Tarana Burke (African-American)
30. Michelle Obama (African-American)
31. Amal Clooney (British-Lebanese)
32. Meghan Markle (African-American/mixed race)
33. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (Latina-American)
34. Naomi Klein (Jewish-American)
35. Kathleen Neal Cleaver (African-American)
36. Winona LaDuke (Native American)
37. Laverne Cox (African-American)

That’s 7 of 37 or 19% of these women are Jewish. 17 of 37 or 45% are black. Clearly, blacks are also over-represented in the second wave American feminist movement. Jewish and black over-representation in liberal causes is likely due to various factors related to historical “oppression” consciousness related to slavery and the holocaust, etc.

If we look at the 2017 women’s march in the US, these were the organizers:

Melissa Miotke (Polish/German name, unknown religion), Teresa Shook (unknown religion), Evvie Harmon (religion unknown), Vanessa Wruble (Jewish), Bob Bland (religion unknown, but was accused of anti-Semitism so not a likely J), Linda Sarsour (Muslim), Tamika Mallory (black), Carmen Perez (Latina), Gloria Steinem (Jewish), Harry Belafonte (black, distant J ancestry raised Catholic), LaDonna Harris (Native American), Angela Davis (black), Dolores Huerta (Hispanic). Mallory, Sarsour and Perez were all accused of anti-Semitism, which led to the Jewish Wruble quitting. Clearly there is an array of people involved in feminism from all kinds of backgrounds.

These Jewish women are into feminism probably partly as a result of the “social justice” ethic of Judaism (same reason the Christian social justice teachings led many Christians into women’s rights and anti-slavery activism) and also just because they’re women and want privileges as many women do. This article on Jewish feminists lists the social justice motive and a rejection of Jewish patriarchal values:

Another article on the topic says a similar thing, that Jewish women first began their revolt within their own community (meaning they’re not applying a different standard for Jews):

So Jewish feminists were rebelling against their own patriarchal traditions within Judaism and broadened that fight to a generic feminism. Their sex is the most important factor here. They’re not Jewish men, but women, just as most of the early suffragettes were Christian women and not men. The blacks involved in feminism are black women, not many men.

The wignat conspiracy take here is that Jewish feminists are promoting this to “mess with the Gentiles” and wreck society for malevolent anti-Gentile reasons, ignoring that they’re promoting the same stuff for Jews. They don’t make the same argument for the Christian suffragettes or the other non-Jewish feminists. Why not? Is feminism a conspiracy of women since virtually all feminists are women? One could make that claim, easily. This conspiracy framing is weak because these Jewish feminists are not protecting Jews from the feminist indoctrination, but rather include them in it and promote it for Israel too. It’s not like they’re protecting Jews from feminism while pushing it exclusively onto non-Jews.

Betty Friedan for example started an analogous feminist movement in Israel:

Feminism is rampant in Israel where laws are biased against men. This documentary explores the feminist outrages in Israel against men, noting “Israeli women are the freest in the East, emancipated and independent.”

Israel has had the same first and second waves of feminism and feminists there do the same things they do in the West.

Here are some Jewish feminist groups in Israel:

Jewish feminists in Israel oppose the religious right and demand more feminist laws:

Gloria Steinem also pushes feminism in Israel and, like most feminists, is a left-liberal who opposes Netanyahu and the “far-right” in Israel:

Feminist Naomi Wolf is herself pro-Palestinian and a critic of the Israeli Right.

Here Wolf criticizes the Israeli lobby in the US:

Another prominent Canadian-Jewish feminist and leftist, Naomi Klein, is a staunch anti-Zionist:

Andrea Dworkin also pushes feminism in Israel and criticizes the country, denouncing the status of “male Jews” over female Jews:

Lots of feminists, being left-liberals politically, support Palestine and not Israel.

So once again we see these Jewish feminists pushing their ideology consistently across national and ethnic lines, which weakens the conspiracy angle that it’s designed to specifically “hurt Gentiles” and spare Jews its effects.

Numerous feminists like Dworkin are also anti-pornography:

Dworkin wrote a book against porn:

Another Jewish feminist Gail Dines was described as the “world’s leading anti-pornography campaigner” and founder of Stop Porn Culture:

So if the agenda of Jewish feminists was simply to “wreck society,” as some allege, then why come out against pornography which helps wreck society? They are indeed perpetrating harm to society with feminism, but they’re doing it under the delusion that feminism helps women. Like the non-Jewish feminists proliferating the same ideas, they’re true believers in the ideology and regard it good for women.

On top of this, there are some prominent Jewish conservative anti-feminists (often second wave-critical) like Laura Loomer, Melanie Phillips (author of “The Sex Change Society: Feminised Britain and the Neutered Male”), Ashley St. Clair (of TPUSA), Judith Reisman (another anti-porn crusader), LibsOfTikTok (Chaya Raichik), Ben Shapiro, Dennis Prager, Christina Hoff Sommers and others.

So if you can find Jews on the other side of this issue, as well as Jewish feminists pushing the same stuff for both Jews in the West and in Israel, then it can’t be considered a generic “conspiracy” to attack Gentiles. They are consistent liberals. And if there are tons of Gentiles doing the same thing —as is the case here—then it’s not a conspiracy of a single ethnic group against another. It’s a women’s movement so women of all races and backgrounds are in it.

Lastly, let’s look at the #MeToo movement. It was started by a black woman, Tarana Burke:

The official MeToo organization started by Burke is staffed almost exclusively by black women:

Their contributors are mostly black and their board is mostly black with one White woman:

It was picked up and promoted by all kinds of celebs of different backgrounds:

The New York Times ran a piece on all the prominent men who were taken down by MeToo sexual assault allegations, the most famous being Jewish Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein. The list includes numerous Jews like aforementioned Weinstein, media mogul Leslie Moonves, senator Al Franken, journalist Mark Halperin, senator Ira Silverstein, TV journalist Matt Lauer (half J), conductor James Levine, editor Lorin Stein, director Bryan Singer, media exec Eric Weinberger, casino mogul Steve Wynn and numerous others. Evidently, Jews are not invincible and their power is not absolute.

If Jews were single-handedly running the “feminist movement” as a tribal operation, then none of these powerful Jewish men would have been targeted and forced out of their jobs by #MeToo accusers.

The UK

The earliest feminists in the UK were Mary Wollstonecraft and Harriet Taylor Mill (wife of classical liberal philosopher John Stuart Mill).

Wollstonecraft, who was raised Christian but stopped attending church, was a key feminist intellectual who was inspired by the French Revolution/Enlightenment.

She is best known for the treatise, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, in which “she argues that women are not naturally inferior to men but appear to be only because they lack education. She suggests that both men and women should be treated as rational beings and imagines a social order founded on reason.”

Wollstonecraft’s writings and “advocacy of women’s equality and critiques of conventional feminity have been significant in the development of feminism.”

Harriet and John Mill co-authored the treatise, “The Enfranchisement of Women”, one of the first to appear advocating for total gender equality before the law.

John Stuart Mill introduced a petition to parliament in 1866 to give women the right to vote:

He was one of the earliest “proponents of gender equality, having been recruited by American feminist John Neal during his stay in London circa 1825–1827.” He authored a book, The Subjection of Women, which was seen as “an affront to European conventional norms regarding the status of men and women” for its egalitarian thrust.

Thus, he was a very influential early feminist in the UK. Mill was agnostic but his father had once been an ordained priest.

The mother of the British suffragette movement was raised Christian (although irreligious), Emily Pankhurst and her daughters.

The UK government takes note of her central role in British women’s suffrage:

The Pankhurst family is closely associated with the militant campaign for the vote. In 1903 Emmeline Pankhurst and others, frustrated by the lack of progress, decided more direct action was required and founded the Women’s Social and Political Union (WSPU) with the motto ‘Deeds not words’.

Emmeline Pankhurst (1858-1928) became involved in women’s suffrage in 1880. She was a founding member of the WSPU in 1903 and led it until it disbanded in 1918. Under her leadership the WSPU was a highly organised group and like other members she was imprisoned and went on hunger strike protests.

Membership of the WSPU was limited to women only. Emmeline Pankhurst’s daughters, Christabel, Sylvia and Adela, were committed members.

Wiki gives us this bio:

Emily Pankhurst was a British political activist who organised the British suffragette movement and helped women to win in 1918 the right to vote in Great Britain and Ireland. In 1999, Time named her as one of the 100 Most Important People of the 20th Century, stating that “she shaped an idea of objects for our time”. She founded and became involved with the Women’s Franchise League, which advocated suffrage for both married and unmarried women.

Millicent Fawcett was a leading suffragette who “campaigned for women’s suffrage by legal change and in 1897–1919 led Britain’s largest women’s rights association, the National Union of Women’s Suffrage Societies (NUWSS).”

She took inspiration from early English feminist Emily Davies, who was raised by a Christian priest:

Sophia Duleep Singh, of Indian descent, was a major suffragette in England who “was one of several Indian women who pioneered the cause of women’s rights in Britain”:

She was also an early advocate for racial egalitarianism in Britain:

Emily Davison “was a staunch feminist and passionate Christian.”

Davison was a tireless campaigner for women’s right to vote:

Kitty Marion (German-born Schafer) was a leading suffragette and abortion advocate:

Her religion is not reported anywhere.

Known as the “first female press photographer,” Cristina Broom is credited with taking photos of suffragette protests and thereby publicizing their cause:

Other influential British suffragettes with a Christian or otherwise non-Jewish background include: Ada Flatman, Flora Drummond, Annie Kenney, Emmeline Pethick-Lawrence, Mary Blathwayt, Clara Codd, Charlotte Marsh, Muriel Matters, etc. Among others.

Here’s a larger list of British suffragettes:

If we skip ahead to today, the most toxic feminist in the British government is Jess Phillips:

Despite her “feminism,” she voted against a public inquiry into the Pakistani grooming gangs:

The most prominent British celebrity feminist is Emma Watson:

The most prominent feminist group in the UK is The Fawcett Society. Here is their board:

So we see some British names and some Arabs. Their staff has a couple foreign names and some Anglos.

Wiki’s list of “British women’s rights activists” has 155 entries. Here they are, mostly Anglo names with some Arabs and Jews thrown in:

The “British feminists” page has 129 entries, mostly Anglo names:

The “British socialist feminists” page has 91 entries, mostly Anglo names, a couple Jews mixed in:

The “British suffragists” page has 151 entries, mostly Anglo names:

The “British feminist writers” page has 130 entries, mostly Anglos with a few Arabs and probably Jews:

The “Scottish feminists” page has 30 entries, mostly Scottish names:

The one Jewish surname there Bernstein came from a “family retained their Jewish surname they identified as Christian.”

The “Welsh feminists” page has 21 entries, mostly Welsh surnames a few foreign:

Canada

Here are the “Famous Five” Canadian suffragettes:

Henrietta Edwards was a strong Baptist Christian. She founded various women’s groups:

Nellie McClung was a Christian.

Louise McKinney was Christian.

Emily Murphy was a Christian.

Irene Parlby has no religious reference but has an Anglo name.

These five led all the legal challenges to get women full rights:

On August 27, 1927, they petitioned the federal government to refer the issue of the eligibility of women to be senator to the Supreme Court of Canada. This petition was the foundation of the Persons Case, a leading constitutional decision. Although most Canadian women had the vote in federal elections and all provinces but Quebec by 1927, the case was part of a larger drive for political equality. This was the first step towards equality for women in Canada and was the start to the first wave of feminism.

Most of the early women’s groups were started by Christians and one group was started by a Jew in Toronto.

Australia

Women’s suffrage in Australia was led mainly by Anglo-Christian women.

Here are the original members of the “Womanhood Suffrage League of New South Wales”:

All of them have clear Anglo surnames and Jewish background doesn’t come up for any of them on Wiki.

Ireland

Here are the main figures of the suffragette movement in Ireland:

France

France’s leading feminist philosopher and writer was Simone de Beauvoir, raised Catholic.

Her influence on French feminism was huge:

She was best known for her “trailblazing work in feminist philosophy”,[8] The Second Sex (1949), a detailed analysis of women’s oppression and a foundational tract of contemporary feminism.

The French Union for Women’s Suffrage was led by one Jewish woman and three non-Jewish women.

The group Suffrage des femmes was founded by Hubertine Auclert, who was Catholic.

Here’s a larger list of French suffragettes:

Possibly two of these people are Jewish: Caroline Kauffmann and Louise Weiss. The rest most likely just French.

Iceland

Said to be the most liberal country in Europe, Iceland’s feminism was always led by Icelandic women.

“the first women’s magazine Framsókn is founded by Ingibjörg Skaptadóttir and Sigríður Þorsteinsdóttir in 1895, and a women’s suffrage organisation, the Icelandic Women’s Rights Association, was founded by Bríet Bjarnhéðinsdóttir in 1907”

“A bill for women’s suffrage was agreed on by the Althing in 1911, ratified by the Althing in 1913, and enacted on 19 June 1915 by the Danish king but only granted the vote to women over 40… In 1920 these restrictions were lifted after Iceland became an independent state under the Danish crown in 1918”

The Icelandic Women’s Rights Association was founded by Bríet Bjarnhéðinsdóttir.

In 1975 Icelandic feminists launched the “women’s strike” where they refused to work for a day. 90% of Icelandic women participated.

The 1975 strike led to the election of the first elected female president in the Western world, Vigdís Finnbogadottir, in 1980 who ruled Iceland for 16 consecutive years.

“Shortly after she took office, the number of women in the Althing saw a significant increase.”

That Icelandic women’s strike inspired other feminists across Europe to do the same:

Iceland’s 1975 strike inspired similar protests in other countries including Poland, where women boycotted jobs and classes in 2016 to protest a proposed abortion ban. In Spain, women staged a 24-hour strike in 2018 on March 8, International Women’s Day, under the theme “If we stop, the world stops.” Spain’s acting equality minister, Irene Montero, said Tuesday that the 2018 strike was inspired by Iceland’s 1975 walkout and expressed full support for the latest protest.

Iceland elected the first female openly gay prime minister, Jóhanna Sigurðardóttir, who served from 2009 to 2013. She said: “The Nordic countries are leading the way on women’s equality, recognizing women as equal citizens rather than commodities for sale.”

Iceland’s second female prime minister passed a “gender pay gap” law.

Same thing in other Nordic countries.

Spain

This website lists five leading Spanish suffragettes and feminists.

Clara Campoamor:

is considered one of the mothers of the feminist and suffragist movement in Spain, being one of the three deputies of the constituent courts of the Second Republic. Defender of the equality of women’s rights, she was one of the impellers of the approval of the universal suffrage in Spain, obtaining the feminine vote in the first republican elections, as well as the first divorce law.

She founded and led various women’s groups:

María Goyri:

Despite being a feminist, she supported Franco in the civil war:

Francesca Bonnemaison i Farriols:

Soledad Cazorla, a lawyer who pushed for prosecutions of men based on “gender violence” leading to the current nightmare state:

Ada Colau, Catalan lesbian politician who leads feminist “strikes” and other nonsense:

Wiki’s “Spanish feminists” page has 138 entries, all clearly Spanish surnamed women (not worth going through all the names just to find a tiny sprinkling of Jews):

All of the leading feminists in Spain today are Spanish, here’s a few:

Irene Montero, leader of the leftist Podemos party, pushed the “yes is yes” feminist law in parliament which makes it easier for women to accuse men of rape and sexual assault. She has in fact led all of the cancerous feminist initiatives in recent years making Spain “among Europe’s most feminist countries.”

Montero’s former husband Pablo Iglesias, founder of Podemos:

Yolanda Diaz, leader of leftist Sumar party:

Rita Maestre, Podemos politician and radical feminist:

Pedro Sanchez (president) is a full-on radical feminist who boasted of putting more women than men in his cabinet:

This degenerate even boasts a “feminist foreign policy”:

Íñigo Errejón, former Podemos politician and male feminist:

Despite being a gaylord feminist who says “believe women” no matter what, he is currently being accused of sexual assault by various women and was forced to step down:

Ana Redondo, the current minister of “equality,” a radfem who says men can’t be victims of domestic violence:

Juan Carlos Monedero, co-founder of Podemos party, and radfem progressive:

Luis Zapatero, former PSOE president, another big feminist who implemented the “gender violence law” and same-sex marriage:

Ione Belarra, Podemos feminist:

With all of these aggressive feminist women running the show, Spain has sunk into a feminazi hellhole:

Sanchez’s cabinet is entirely Spanish people, no Jews:

Despite Spain being led entirely by Spaniards, it’s the most leftist-feminist country in Europe. The Jew-trappers will cope by saying all of these people are “paid off” by Jews (despite campaigns being mostly publicly financed), which is laughable considering that all of these Spanish leftists are PRO-PALESTINE and oppose Israel. Sanchez just did an arms embargo on Israel over the Gaza war.

This is a list of 27 Spanish billionaires. There’s only two Jews on the list: one is dead and the other was “brought up Catholic by her mother and was for some years associated with the Legionnaires of Christ.”

Conclusion

The purpose of this article is not to blame feminism exclusively on “Christians,” but to show that it’s not exclusively the fault of Jews or any one group of people. If anything, women are the evident protagonists behind feminism, but not all women are to blame either and some men are to blame too.

Like in every case here, a variety of people from different backgrounds support feminism. Christians led the way for women’s suffrage in most Western countries and Jews took up prominent posts in the second wave, but mostly in the United States because it has a large Jewish population. In countries with few Jews, like Iceland, Ireland, Spain, Scandinavia, etc., feminism is led by non-Jewish European women.

At the end of the day, feminism is a women’s movement so women lead it. Their particular ethnic or religious backgrounds and possible motivations are less important than their sex, which is the main reason they’re feminists.

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a small contribution.

Please share and subscribe as well!

Duration: 3h 10min 57sec

Topics: I run down the substantial evidence that Christian charities and churches are neck-deep in illegal migrant trafficking; of religious groups they receive the most subsidies from the US government to resettlement migrants & are the majority of refugee charities working with the UN too; J-trappers can’t cope with this reality so they invent kooky conspiracy theories to blame it all on Js; second half OMETV.

One example:

If you highlight all these liberal Jews doing X thing and then omit all the liberal non-Jews doing the same thing, then you’re being dishonest and distorting reality to make it seem like all and only that one group is doing that thing.

Why do the memers choose to deceive like this? If mass immigration is bad and groups who promote it are bad, then why leave out the Christians (and secular non-religious people) who are promoting it? Why give them a pass and only focus in on Jews who do it?

After observing these people’s behavior on platforms like X, my conclusion is that most of the people who only talk about Jews and immigration are themselves Christians. As Christians, they are hard-pressed to find fault in the actions of members of their own group. It’s much easier to blame it all on an “other” and project moral purity for themselves as victims of this “other”. Same phenomenon with White nationalists who deny the role that Whites have played in the decline of the West. “Not my group, we are victims of other groups!”

So let’s look at it.

World Relief, a Christian humanitarian group, penned an article highlighting historical Christian support for refugees and immigrants. To justify their stance on a religious basis, they cite a bible verse often cited by Jews who support immigration too:

“Welcome the stranger” seems to be the clarion call for both Christians and Jews who have championed refugees and “the vulnerable” in general. World Relief says it’s a “biblical calling” to support immigrants and oppose restrictions on their entry:

In recent U.S. history, Christians have referenced Deuteronomy 24:14 as a moral reason to look out for the good of immigrants: “Do not take advantage of a hired worker who is poor and needy, whether that worker is a fellow Israelite or a foreigner residing in one of your towns.”

This Scripture has inspired countless people of faith to seek justice and care for immigrants navigating a foreign culture in the United States.

At times of prevalent anti-immigrant narratives, Christians have returned to the Bible’s command to care for immigrants and refugees. At times when the Church forgot its mandate, bold leaders reminded the Church of this biblical calling.

The article cites the case of William Speer, a Presbyterian pastor and missionary, who became a vocal advocate for Chinese immigrant laborers in California in the 1840s and 1850s when Americans were demanding restrictions on immigration.

Speer became:

a vocal advocate for the fair treatment of Chinese immigrants. He used his relationships, knowledge of their language, and workforce data to argue against anti-Chinese legislation and even planted a Chinese Christian church in San Francisco in 1853. During his lifetime, he was vocal in opposition to racial prejudice and left a legacy of successors who contributed to fighting the racist anti-Chinese sentiment and joined with Chinese Christians to lead and channel Presbyterian support for the community.

Next it cites the activities of the Christian organization YMCA (Young Men’s Christian Association) who aided the millions of new immigrants to the US in the early 20th century:

other Christians formed organizations and associations that helped immigrants integrate into the community. The YMCA in Cincinnati hosted the first known English as a Second Language (ESL) class in 1856 to help German immigrants gain language skill. Additionally, the YMCA served Asian communities in San Francisco. Then, in 1903, the YMCA created a specific department to work with industrial workers and immigrants, a legacy continued through to the YMCA’s present day adult education classes, refugee services, and New American Welcome Centers.

It references the work of Christian organizations, churches and charities who lobbied the US government to accept displaced persons and refugees during and after World War II:

During this displacement, Catholic and Protestant congregations organized to respond. Christians joined with U.S. policymakers to convince American citizens to sponsor refugees. And while the U.S. Government created new resettlement legislation, Christian agencies and churches planned and implemented resettlement efforts, while also advocating before the government. In 1948, the United States passed the country’s first refugee and resettlement law. As a result, the government and Christian agencies partnered to help displaced Europeans seeking permanent residence in the United States after World War II. And to welcome the newcomers into community life.

In a thirty year period between 1950 and 1980, the US government did not provide assistance to refugees, so the Christian churches and faith groups “stepped up to fill in the gaps and help refugees get their footing.” World Relief notes the example of Christian missionary Evelyn Mangham who personally cold-called hundreds of churches to convince them to take in Vietnamese refugees fleeing the war:

a woman named Evelyn Mangham emerged to call the Church to welcome Vietnamese refugees. With 20 years of experience as a missionary, Evelyn Mangham cold-called churches. She quoted the Bible. And she told stories. Because of her commitment to the Church and Scripture, she worked tirelessly to convince churches to sponsor refugees from Vietnam. In the span of a year, she had convinced churches to sponsor 10,000 refugees from Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia.

Mangham went on to found the World Relief charity alongside her husband.

The 1980s rolled around and “Christians, alongside Jewish and other faith leaders, advocated on behalf of [Latino] migrants [fleeing conflicts]”. This led to the Sanctuary Movement:

The Sanctuary Movement began in 1980 with a goal: to provide shelters to Central American refugees fleeing civil wars. For instance, churches provided English lessons, basic humanitarian help, and legal aid through immigration attorneys. Additionally, leaders preached sermons, organized protests, and advocated to the government on behalf of the asylum seekers. And hundreds of religious communities provided sanctuary, usually inside houses of worship. At its height, the movement grew to include more than 500 congregations.

The Sanctuary Movement lobbied Reagan to pass “the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986. This landmark piece of legislation extended temporary worker visa programs and helped 3 million people gain legal status.”

Two prominent leaders of the Sanctuary Movement were retired Presbyterian minister John Fife (who founded the No More Deaths NGO) and American Quaker James A. Corbett.

World Relief ends their article noting that of the leading nine refugee resettlement agencies working with the US government, five are Christian:

Today, there are nine agencies that work with the U.S. Government to resettle refugees. World Relief is one of them, along with five other faith-based organizations. One is Jewish, one is Catholic, and three others are Protestant.

The UNHCR’s webpage lists ten refugee resettlement agencies that they work with and six are Christian:

It’s a similar phenomenon in the UK where 90% of the refugee charities are Christian:

There are also a few Jewish and Islamic groups doing the same there.

Another article on the topic reveals the extensive support American Christians have given to immigrants and refugees at various times. It explains that Christian public opinion in the US is turning against immigration as of late, but it was not always that way:

Before the 1990s, evangelical Christians were busier resettling the newly arrived refugees than banning them from entering the United States. Before they became immigration restrictionists, evangelicals actively endorsed and participated in a large-scale legalization effort for undocumented immigrants (and, indeed, some evangelicals still assist undocumented immigrants in that way). In cooperation with the Justice Department’s Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), evangelical churches across the country helped legalize thousands of undocumented immigrants during the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act’s legalization program.

Signed into law by Ronald Reagan, the reform allowed the opportunity for nearly three million undocumented immigrants to become permanent residents. Among other civil sector organizations, this program enlisted the support of evangelical churches, which provided facilities and volunteers to help interested individuals determine their eligibility and process their applications for citizenship. Nearly all of the major evangelical denominations and organizations were involved – either independently or by participating in the Evangelical Task Force on Legalization run by World Relief, an evangelical relief and resettlement organization.

This support was substantial and essential to the entry of tens of thousands of migrants into the US:

For evangelical pastors, the legalization program was an opportunity to minister to and serve those marginalized by society, as well as a way to solve problems relating to immigration issues in their own pews. While INS officers provided the training and the forms, evangelicals offered the public space, equipment, and volunteers to process legalization forms and determine applicants’ eligibility. Throughout the duration of the program between May 1987 and May 1988, the Task Force established twenty-eight processing centers as well as eighty-five counseling centers in the churches of its member denominations. At the end of the program, 14,518 applications had been submitted to INS through the task force, and 70,000 individuals had received counseling on their eligibility.

Once again, they cited biblical passages to justify it:

In their efforts to help legalize undocumented immigrants under the Immigration Reform and Control Act, evangelicals drew on many Scriptural commands to show hospitality and “welcome the stranger.” They had previously cited these commands when they helped resettle refugees from Cuba in the 1960s and from Southeast Asia during the 1970s and early 1980s. In their efforts to attract refugee sponsors and volunteers for their ministry to undocumented immigrants, evangelical leaders explained that the Bible was filled with stories of migration and replete with commands to the people of Israel to protect the sojourners in their midst. They stressed that extending a welcoming hand to refugees was not only in line with, but was imperative in light of biblical teaching on the care of foreigners. Helping refugees was a direct response to Christ’s call to help “the least of these my brethren” and to both Old and New Testament commands to practice hospitality toward the sojourner.

Another article mentions Evangelical Christian assistance to Cuban and Asian migrants:

Evangelical leaders have called on Christians to “welcome the stranger” since the early 1960s, when evangelical churches started getting involved in the resettlement of Cuban refugees through the U.S. government’s Cuban Refugee Center…. This was not just applied to coreligionists: The same denominations and organizations that had resettled the Catholic Cubans in the 1960s (though these were not viewed as fellow Christians, either) continued to resettle refugees from Southeast Asia in the 1970s and 1980s, many of whom where Buddhists. Southern Baptist volunteers held Americanization and ESL classes at the refugee camps in Arkansas (Fort Chaffee), California (Camp Pendleton) and Florida (Eglin Air Force Base), where the refugees arrived. They built relationships with the refugees and guided them through the day-to-day activities in the camp. In fact, some of the volunteers were former missionaries to Vietnam, who – unable to continue their missionary work on site – discovered that their mission field had relocated with them. They were an important resource for the Immigration and Naturalization Service, which gladly accepted their services as language and sometimes cultural interpreters.

While this pro-immigrant sentient is starting to change among the general Christian public in the West, the Christian church leadership is still mostly on board with globalism. The Catholic Pope Francis is the most vocal proponent for open borders.

Pope Francis has been one of the most outspoken globalists in the Vatican, calling relentlessly for more liberal and tolerant immigration policies. He has called the rejection of refugees a “grave sin”:

Working to turn migrants away from the prospect of peace and security in a new country is “a grave sin,” Pope Francis said. “It needs to be said clearly: There are those who systematically work by all means to drive away migrants, and this, when done knowingly and deliberately, is a grave sin,” he said during his general audience Aug. 28.

As Trump comes into office, Pope Francis just appointed a liberal Bishop to be the next archbishop of Washington:

Cardinal McElroy, 70, is a longtime supporter of the pope’s pastoral agenda, and is known for regularly speaking out on the inclusion of migrants, women and L.G.B.T.Q. people in the Catholic church and in the United States.

At a news conference at the Cathedral of St. Matthew the Apostle in Washington on Monday morning, Cardinal McElroy directly addressed Mr. Trump’s immigration proposals, stating that plans for a “wider, indiscriminate, massive deportation across the country” would be “incompatible with Catholic doctrine.”

Catholic charities are heavily involved in lobbying for and directly assisting the entry of migrants into many Western countries. The International Catholic Migration Commission itself says Catholic groups are responsible for resettling 30% of the refugees who enter the US:

The nine national refugee resettlement agencies of the United States, including the Migration and Refugees Services of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, have urged the U.S. Administration to increase the number of refugee admissions to the country. They call upon the president to authorize the arrival of 62,500 refugees by the end of September 2021.

In a 9 April letter to President Joseph Biden, the nine U.S. national domestic refugee resettlement agencies urge him to honor his commitment of increasing refugee resettlement opportunities. Among the agencies is the International Catholic Migration Commission (ICMC)’s national member, Migration and Refugee Services of the U.S. Catholic Bishops’ Conference, which assists in the resettlement of approximately 30% of refugees to the country. Its resettlement network includes over 100 diocesan offices across the country.

An article on the subject tells us this:

USCCB affiliate Catholic Charities boasts assistance to an annual 650,000 migrants on the record, each of whom received legal counsel, jobs, transportation, food & shelter, and contacts for further assistance inside the country. The Catholic Legal Immigrant Network (CLINIC) claims offering legal assistance to an additional 500,000 annually. Assuming no overlap, as much as over 1 million immigrants are receiving legal aid & transportation from the Catholic Church every year.

An array of services and lawfare is offered by the Church and its countless subgroups. Catholic Charities focuses on so-called “respite centers”, also known as migrant camps. The large tent cities you see on the news are not random but in fact built and maintained by NGOs such as CC. They operate on *both* sides of the border. Once across, they feed, wash, clothe, and bed migrants. After a rest, they meet individually and give legal counsel and a plane or bus ticket to the next center with instructions on who to meet and when. Have you wondered, “who paid for their transportation? Who pays for the hotels, the brand new clothes?” Chances are high that it was your church.

CLINIC alternatively focuses on legal assistance to migrants, public advocacy, lawfare training, and lobbying. It is the US’s largest network of immigrant activist programs, founded by the USCCB in 1989. Its website promises free services including direct legal representation, family reunification, and VISA acquisition. On top of this, it is also one of the most prominent immigrant lobbying groups in the country. CLINIC was personally responsible in stifling a number of Trump’s immigration reform policies, including ending permanent residency for refugees and requiring refugees to prove “credible fear” in an interview with a federal official. Additionally, they offer counsel and training to legal groups on the state and local level. If there is a legal matter involving an immigration policy, CLINIC has its hands on it. As of writing, CLINIC is working on getting Temporary Protected Status and permanent residency for thousands of Palestinians and Congolese wishing to enter the US.

When this group is brought up, the 4chan MEMETARDS always post a selectively photoshopped image of some of CLINIC’s staff who have German/Jewish-sounding names.

There’s no proof all five of these five staff members are Jewish, they could be German, but let’s break it down further. This is a cherry pick of five names off a list of 58 staff!

Clearly, the vast majority of these people are not Jewish (assuming those five are). Moreover, this is not the Board but the staff. This is the current staff:

Here are the members of the board:

It’s all Catholic clergy.

The same types of messages can be heard from other church leaders. The Church of England vigorously backs migrants and refugees and sponsors their entry in the UK.

Christian churches and charities are doing this in most Western countries, including Iceland.

Churches in Spain are doing the same:

Same in Canada:

Germany’s Protestant Church helps fund Sea-Watch 4 who rescue migrants in the Med and bring them to Europe.

Christian charities are getting the lion’s share of over a billion dollars in US government grants to resettle refugees.

Catholic charities are getting over three billion in federal grants.

You can compare that with the between 250 to 350 million that HIAS (Hebrew Immigrant Aid) gets depending on the year.

In 2017, 100 Evangelical leaders signed a letter blasting Donald Trump’s Muslim immigration ban:

Scores of evangelical leaders, including at least one from each state, have taken out a full-page newspaper advertisement to denounce President Donald Trump’s temporary ban on refugees, urging him to reconsider his executive order and welcome people fleeing persecution and violence.

Signees include Pastor Timothy Keller of Redeemer Presbyterian Church in New York, Christian author Ann Voskamp, Bill and Lynne Hybels of Willow Creek Community Church, preacher and author Max Lucado, Pastor Eugene Cho of Quest Church and Leith Anderson, president of the National Association of Evangelicals.

These are some of the Bible passages Christian groups have used to justify their pro-immigration stance:

The evidence for this goes on and on.

Some Americans trace mass immigration from the third world back to the 1965 Hart-Cellar immigration act and put all of the blame for that squarely on the Jewish groups and Jewish congressman Emmanuel Cellar for its passage. But Christians were also involved and central to its success.

Philip Hart, the bill co-sponsor, was Catholic. Ted Kennedy, a big supporter of the bill, is Catholic and cited the familiar “welcome the stranger” bible passages to justify his support. Ted Kennedy continued to support progressive causes long after the 1965 immigration bill:

The Irish Catholic Kennedy family, especially John F. Kennedy, were instrumental in forwarding the general civil rights movement in the 1960s as well as immigration reform to abolish the national origins quota system. The Democrat capture of the house and senate in 1960 laid the groundwork for the passage of civil rights bills. Cofnas reports:

Kennedy’s election in 1960 “ensured that immigration reform, though not a priority for the new administration, would find a place on the new president’s agenda” (ibid.: 55). In 1965, Johnson was president, and Democrats controlled both the Senate (68–32) and the House (295–140). Graham comments: “These circumstances, especially the egalitarian thrust from the civil rights movement, virtually ensured that the 89th Congress would be pressed by the White House and the congressional leadership to abolish the national origins quota system in 1965” (ibid.: 56).

What the JQers often leave out of the discussion is that, while Jews played a strong role in pushing for immigration reform, so did Italian Catholics who formed a lobbying group to pressure the congress to pass the 1965 Hart-Cellar bill. The Irish Catholic Kennedy family of politicians led the charge for civil rights, including immigration liberalization:

Immigration reform was also a personal project of John F. Kennedy, Chin notes, whose pamphlet written as a senator was published after his assassination as the book A Nation of Immigrants, and argued for the elimination of the National Origins Quota System in place since 1921. Ted Kennedy, along with Attorney General and Sen. Robert Kennedy (D-N.Y.), were both proponents of the bill, in part to honor their brother and also because it was consistent with their general interest in civil rights and international cold war politics, Chin adds.

Renewal of the system was particularly offensive to groups that represented Italians and Jews, who had been particularly affected by the restrictions. The American Committee on Italian Migration conducted an intensive lobbying campaign. Publication of A Nation of Immigrants was a project of the Anti-Defamation league of B’nai B’rith, which had been impressed by Sen. John F. Kennedy’s record of supporting liberal immigration laws, including measures to accept refugees from war-ravaged Europe. The book was actually written by a member of Kennedy’s staff, Myer Feldman. Describing Kennedy’s participation as minimal, Feldman said the senator had “reviewed it, and did some editing.”10

While Kennedy was one of his era’s most outspoken reform advocates, he used a 1957 speech to the American Jewish Congress to make clear that he did not favor unlimited immigration. He stated his conviction that “we should have a system of limited and selective migration to the United States.” Kennedy’s principal objection with the status quo was about “the nature, not the existence” of restrictions. Asserting that a selective policy was necessary, he said that policy should “give preference to an immigrant because he is a nuclear physicist rather than because he is an Anglo-Saxon.”11

Kennedy was aware of the political as well as the ideological value of expansive immigration policies, especially in northern states where immigrants and their families were concentrated. In a 1955 letter to fellow Sen. Lyndon Johnson, he wrote, “The Democratic Party must do something to fulfill its 1952 pledges concerning revision of the McCarran Act if it is to have any appeal in the large cities of the North in 1956.”12

That Italian-Catholic lobbying group rarely gets a mention when talking about the Hart-Cellar bill, but it was important:

The American Committee on Italian Migration (ACIM) was organized in February 1952 as a member agency of the National Catholic Resettlement Council, which later formed part of the National Catholic Welfare Conference (NCWC). From its inception, ACIM’s chief objective was the liberalization of the United States immigration policy that, as delineated in the McCarran-Walter Act of 1952, rested upon a restrictive “national origins” quota. ACIM undertook a wide range of activities, from raising funds to sponsoring new Italian immigrants into the United States and promoting new immigration legislation by Congress. This collection contains additional materials donated to CMS by ACIM in 2003, mostly documenting ACIM’s work in the 1970s-1990s. The collection contains office files and case records pertaining to lobbying US Congress regarding immigration law, and to the assistance of Italian immigrants in Italy and the United States.

Pretty much all of the groups who were being excluded by the national origins quotas were inclined to support the reforms:

John Higham described the 1924 Johnson-Reed Act as a “blatantly discriminatory” effort “to freeze the existing balance of ethnic strains in the total American population” by sharply restricting the arrival of immigrants from southern and eastern Europe. “Since the brunt of the restrictionist attack was aimed more than ever at the supposedly racial qualities of the new immigration, it stung the Jews, the Italians, the Slavs, and the Greeks deeply,” Higham wrote.

The Hart-Cellar Act and most other major civil rights acts were passed by Lyndon Baines Johnson’s administration after JFK was assassinated. Johnson’s “Great Society” bills created the modern civil rights/welfare state.

On the immigration issue, Johnson had this to say:

But as Johnson delivered his first such address less than two months after becoming president he became an energetic advocate of the reform. “We must … lift by legislation the bars of discrimination against those who seek entry into our country, particularly those who have much needed skills and those joining their families,” President Johnson said. In a reference to the legislation’s use of preferences to replace national quotas, he added: “A nation that was built by the immigrants of all lands can ask those who now seek admission: ‘What can you do for our country?’ But we should not be asking: ‘In what country were you born?’”

Johnson was a fervent Christian who cited his religion to justify his stand against discrimination. He “believed in the brotherhood of all mankind, in racial and religious tolerance, and in the integrity and dignity of the individual.”

He was an active Christian and descended from a long line of Baptist preachers:

Moreover, this is what LBJ’s cabinet looked like when he passed the Civil Rights Act:

I’m only counting two Jews out of 29 people.

Without the Kennedy family, LBJ, Hart and other Christians (including all the hundreds of other Democratic congressmen and senators), that bill and other civil rights bills don’t get passed.

If we move onto modern politics, we can find plenty of politicians who identify as Christians promoting the same open borders globalism that Jewish liberals like George Soros have been spearheading.

Joe Biden, an Irish Catholic, said it’s a “good thing” Whites will become a minority in the US.

He often cites his faith to buttress his social justice politics.

Peter Sutherland, an Irish Catholic, served as UN Special Representative for International Migration from 2006 to 2017. He also headed the International Catholic Migration Commission for a time. He was a leading advocate for open borders in Europe, once calling explicitly for “undermining the national homogeneity of Europe.”

Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, raised religiously Catholic, championed the most liberal immigration policies in the country’s history. He explicitly said Canada has “no core identity” and put a Somali refugee in charge of immigration in his first term.

Germany’s former Chancellor Angela Merkel is a Protestant. She championed the most liberal immigration policies in Germany’s history, allowing millions of Syrian refugees into the country in 2015 and many others.

Merkel’s father was a Lutheran pastor and theologian and she was raised in a religious environment. She was “deeply influenced by her father”. Merkel’s biographer noted that she “was more intensely affected by her family home and the Christian faith than she was by her study of physics”. She was quoted saying that she is a believer in God, she attends an Evangelical church, religion is her “constant companion” and “the Bible is the book that has most influenced her life”. She also said Germany’s value system was based on Christianity.

Tony Blair, the UK Prime Minister who opened the floodgates of mass immigration in the 1990s under his leadership, was raised Anglican and converted to Catholicism. He spearheaded the most liberal immigration policy in the UK’s history.

Far-left Democrat politician Elizabeth Warren, a Christian, justified her social justice stances by citing her faith.

There’s an interesting contrast here between the Christian liberal Warren vs the Jewish conservative Stephen Miller, who Warren tried to drive out of the White House.

Frans Timmermans, a Dutch politician and former Vice-President of the European Commission, is one of the most radical advocates for diversity and open borders. He said: “Diversity is humanity’s destiny… there will not be, even in the remotest places of this planet, a nation that won’t see diversity in its future”.

He hasn’t specifically cited his faith for his political views but he is a Roman Catholic.

One of the loudest advocates for open borders and charity to Africa is singer Bono, an Irishman who was raised in a religious Christian household. Wiki mentions that his lyrics “frequently include social and political themes, and religious imagery inspired by his Christian beliefs.”

Jamie Drummond, a board member of Bono’s charity, said this: “As Africa’s population doubles they will be coming to Europe… and that is a good thing because we will be senile…we need their youthful energy.”

It later came out that Bono’s charity gives only 1.2% of its donations to poor Africans and pockets the rest.

This is what the board looks like (three Jews out of 12):

Kamala Harris, the most liberal politician in America today (who oversaw Biden’s disastrous open border) and de-facto leader of the Democrat Party, was raised as a Baptist and attended church.

She does not often cite her faith to back up her political liberalism but she does nonetheless still profess Christianity.

That’s just the tip of the iceberg. In the entertainment world, you can find plenty of Christians or people who were raised Christian who champion liberalism and globalism. One was “anti-establishment” comedian George Carlin, an Irish Catholic.

Carlin appears in multiple instances to make explicitly anti-White statements. In a Seattle Times interview, he hailed the “decline of the white race on this planet.”

Many of the major late-night hosts and other hosts of political shows are leftists and a number of them are Christian or were raised Christian. Stephen Colbert, John Oliver, Chris Cuomo, Rachael Maddow, Jimmy Kimmel, and Chris Hayes were all raised Christian.

Colbert infamously said, “White people will soon be a minority in America and that’s great!”

Other celebrities like Robert DeNiro and Leonardo Dicaprio are notorious political liberals who hate Trump.

The intention of this article is not to cast aspersions on all Christians or blame them for what the Christian leadership has done. I argue the same point against blaming all Jews for the liberal stances of their elite. Fortunately, the majority of Christians are turning against mass immigration and reject the globalism of their elites.

I could make another article showing all the non-Jewish and non-Christian atheists who support the same open borders globalism that the Jewish and Christian elite do. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate that there is no single group that’s responsible for the implementation of globalist/liberal policies. The memetards who suffer from tunnel vision want us to blame exclusively Jews for immigration, but the preponderance of the evidence shows there are many more people involved from different ethnic and religious backgrounds.

Let’s blame all of the culprits not just some.

If you enjoyed this article please consider a small donation or becoming a member.