Duration: 3h 27min 51sec

Topcis: Gnostic Informant comes on to talk about Alt-Media SLOP; schizos taking over X; JQers; Christian quesiton & more!

Duration: 3h 47min 56sec

Topics: I interview Adam Green on Abrahamist Spergery; we dive into the links between Judaism & Christianity; Adam compiled clips of rabbis saying that they thank Christianity for spreading monotheism to the world & that Pagan idol worship is their main enemy; we dive into the sleazy online slop merchants using Christianity to get money from paypigs; second half some OME & chat questions.

When you look at writings of Marx, all of his public and private declarations about Jews are extremely negative and hostile. He never wrote a good word about them and, in fact, labeled them the epitome of what he despised: capitalist profiteers (money-lenders, merchants, etc.).

Karl Marx was raised Protestant and professed belief in Christ as a youth.

Marx wrote “On the Jewish Question” and said this:

Let us consider the actual, worldly Jew – not the Sabbath Jew, as Bauer does, but the everyday Jew. Let us not look for the secret of the Jew in his religion, but let us look for the secret of his religion in the real Jew. What is the secular basis of Judaism? Practical need, self-interest. What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money. Very well then! Emancipation from huckstering and money, consequently from practical, real Judaism, would be the self-emancipation of our time. An organization of society which would abolish the preconditions for huckstering, and therefore the possibility of huckstering, would make the Jew impossible. His religious consciousness would be dissipated like a thin haze in the real, vital air of society. On the other hand, if the Jew recognizes that this practical nature of his is futile and works to abolish it, he extricates himself from his previous development and works for human emancipation as such and turns against the supreme practical expression of human self-estrangement. We recognize in Judaism, therefore, a general anti-social element of the present time, an element which through historical development – to which in this harmful respect the Jews have zealously contributed – has been brought to its present high level, at which it must necessarily begin to disintegrate. In the final analysis, the emancipation of the Jews is the emancipation of mankind from Judaism.

And this:

Once society has succeeded in abolishing the empirical essence of Judaism – huckstering and its preconditions – the Jew will have become impossible, because his consciousness no longer has an object, because the subjective basis of Judaism, practical need, has been humanized, and because the conflict between man’s individual-sensuous existence and his species-existence has been abolished. The social emancipation of the Jew is the emancipation of society from Judaism.

So Marx labeled Jews hucksters and called for the abolition of Judaism and Jews as a unique group. Looking at that, it’s very hard for me to believe he was pursuing a tribalist agenda when he despised them. Don’t attach the name Marx to these statements and your average Neo-Nazi would be shouting in agreement.

Fredrich Engels, Marx’s closest collaborator and co-author of many communist texts, was a non-Jew. Ironically, Engels was notably less anti-Jewish in comparison with Marx and denounced the phenomenon publicly, although he made some private anti-Jewish remarks. How do the J-communism theorists explain that? The non-Jew Engels opposed anti-Semitism publicly, while the Jew Marx supported and contributed to it.

More from Marx:

In 1845 in The Holy Family Marx claimed that in his articles in the Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher he had “proved that the task of abolishing the essence of Jewry is in truth the task of abolishing Jewry in civil society, abolishing the inhumanity of today’s practice of life, the summit of which is the money system”. In 1849 an article in the Neue Rheinische Zeitung, of which Marx was the editor, criticised the notion that Jews living in Prussia’s Polish provinces should be regarded as Germans. The article declared that these Jews were “the filthiest of all races”. “Neither by speech nor by descent- but only by their greed for profit – can they be looked upon as relatives of the Germans in Frankfurt.” Robert Payne has remarked that “this solution of the Jewish question was not very different from Adolf Hitler’s, for it involved the liquidation of Judaism”.

Marx was poor and often had to take out loans (sometimes from Jews), which motivated much of his sentiment against them:

He had many dealings with Jewish financial agents in the City of London. The Bambergers (father and son), Stiefel and Spielmann were German Jews whose names frequently crop up in the Marx-Engels correspondence. Marx made use of the Jews to raise small loans and to discount bills of exchange received from Dana (editor of the New York Daily Tribune) in advance payment for articles which Marx had agreed to write. Marx complained bitterly that the Jews would not discount his bills until confirmation from Dana had been received’ and he was furious when they pressed him to honour debts due for repayment. Marx showed his contempt by always referring to them as “Jew (or little Jew) Bamberger” and “Jew Spielmann” or by imitating the nasal twang characteristic of the way in which some Jews from eastern Europe spoke German. Yet Marx had cause to regret the day when the Bambergers were not in business in London any more and were no longer available to discount his bills of exchange. In 1859 he wrote to Engels: ‘it is the devil of a nuisance that I have no Bamberger in London any more.’

He goes on to disparage his fellow J socialist Lasalle as a “Jewish n-word” among other insults. In fact, both privately and publicly he would go on and on about Jewish money-lenders (see above snippets) and that was his principle gripe with Jews as a group. All of this sounds strikingly similar to the Nazis’ own rhetoric about Jews and money-lending.

In my view this fully refutes the J-communism conspiracy. If the only thing Marx is writing about Jews both in public and privately is negative and he is advocating for their disappearance as a group/religion, then how could he be the centerpiece of an agenda to advance that group’s interests? Some people are emotionally attached to that theory though, so they will react with hostility to any facts that undermine it.

The only and main critique that the Nazis leveled at Marx and Marxism was its “denial of the personality principle” or the “race principle” and simply that Marx was “a Jew”, deceptively ignoring the similarity of his own views on Jews with theirs. Rarely, if ever, did they critique Marxism on economic grounds and, in the case of Goebbels, asserted that Marx was right in his critique of capitalism:

“Karl Marx described the causes of capitalist development reasonably correctly. But we [Marxists and National Socialists] are both always and forever right about capitalism. The will to freedom rises up from the collapsing system. It finds its form in fundamentally new ideas: in Bolshevism and National Socialism. Both emerge with the ultimate belief that they will bring freedom to an entire world by overthrowing it. Bolshevism and National Socialism are embodied in two people who lead a purposeful minority in the will to the future: Lenin and Hitler.” – Goebbels

“Lenin was the greatest man, second to Hitler. The difference between Communism and the Hitler faith is slight” – Goebbels

If you enjoyed this content consider a contribution or a membership.

Duration: 4h 6min 59sec

Topics: Canopeaz joins the show to discuss the MacDonald-Cofnas controversy; Nathan Cofnas’ critique of MacDonald’s thesis contains some interesting truths; We look at some of the exaggerations of MacDonald, namely ignoring/downplaying of Gentile leftists involved & misrepresenting the motivations of Franz Boas & Karl Marx (both of whom advocated for the dissolution of Jews as a group) & Levy-Strauss; Jewish leftism is, in some major cases, motivated by Holocaust PTSD & the “safety concern” which we call out; second half I quarrel with the chat about some of these details.

SUPERCHATS

The lying hypocrite Eskin then hubristically complained about Poland’s new law forbidding suggestions of Polish culpability in the Holocaust, even while his fellow Jews have forced laws on dozens of European countries forbidding skepticism about the highly questionable Holocaust narrative.

Eskin is a close confidant of fellow satanic kabbalist Dugin and the Eurasianist movement. He promotes Russian expansion into Eastern Europe in order to exact revenge on the descendants of “Nazi collaborators” there.

Another prominent Jew who supports Dugin’s Eurasian project is Rabbi Avrom Shmulevich, who attended Dugin’s founding congress for the Eurasianist Russia-Wide Political Public Movement (OPOD) in 2001, representing Russia’s chief rabbi and Putin ally Berl Lazar at the conference.

Shmulevich said that “participation of the Jewish population of Russia in the “Eurasia” movement is explained by the strengthening of the relations between Russia and Israel and by the fact that the idea of eurasianism finds active support in Israeli society.”  He opined that “eurasianism gives the possibility of preserving for all peoples, including Jews, their identity.”

Sean Jobst extensively covered the Jewish links to Dugin and Eurasianism on our website, revealing how Eskin referred to both Jews and Russians as “chosen peoples,” and how Dugin praised Jewry’s blood-drenched role in Russian Bolshevism.

Dugin is not a white nationalist, writing in Foundations of Geopolitics that Russia “never made its goal the creation of a mono-ethnic, racially uniform state.” Putin made similar comments in a 2013 speech. “Nationalists must remember that Russia was formed specifically as a multi-ethnic and multi-confessional country from its very inception,” Putin said. “Nationalists must remember that by calling into question our multi-ethnic character, and exploiting the issue of Russian, Tatar, Caucasian, Siberian or any other nationalism or separatism, means that we are starting to destroy our genetic code. In effect, we will begin to destroy ourselves.”

Dugin only wishes to manipulate some gullible and shekel-hungry Western white nationalists as useful idiots in his “chaos” plan of backing both sides against the middle, all part of his spiritual warfare scheme against Western countries, endeavouring to break them apart by stoking racial and religious tensions among whites.

The fact is that Dugin is a mad occultist hell-bent on bringing an end to the world. He’s certainly no “ally” of Western patriots trying to preserve our heritage… in fact he wants us all dead.

Commentary by Brandon Martinez

A demented clique of “truther” Muslims and their leftist foot-soldiers are jihading against me on Twitter, allegedly for my “betrayal” (rather disillusionment) of their social justice cause to “save the world” and utopian fantasy of permanently ending war. Between the years 2014 and 2016 my writing was heavily focused on issues like US foreign policy, the Israel-Palestine conflict and other subjects that cater to Muslim sensibilities. I was, at that time, effectively a sabbath kaffir writing propaganda for Muslims and Arabs. I wrote for and gave interviews to mostly Middle Eastern publications. Some of it was accurate, but I wouldn’t stand by all of it today. This focus of mine attracted numerous Muslims and leftists to my writing. During that time I would often jump the gun and declare any terrorism involving Muslims “staged” within days without sufficient proof or research – part of the cognitive anti-war reflex to “debunk” anything that could possibly lead to conflict. Recognizing my error, I’ve since corrected that misguided tendency of mine. After coming across new evidence that contradicted what I believed before, I’ve changed my position accordingly on some of these events. That’s what honest people do; they don’t just indefinitely hold to a position no matter what.

I’ve also realized the folly in obsessing about issues like false flags. My critics among this group of Muslims, leftists and conspiracy hobbyists have no argument against what I’m saying now, and simply drudge up something I said a year ago, as if to say, “look what you were saying then, it’s different from what you’re saying now, therefore you’re a shill.” These imbeciles believe that dogmatically sticking to a position despite encountering new information and evidence to the contrary makes you “credible”? No, that makes you a hard-headed and deluded ideologue who cannot admit your mistakes.

What it all comes down to here is that these Muslims viewed me as a powerful asset for their Semitic agenda when I was focusing on issues that they care about (Middle East, Palestine, wars). But now that I’ve moved on from that dead-end and shifted my focus to more pressing matters relating to the Zionist/Globalist war against Europe and White men in particular, an agenda in which Muslims are quintessential useful idiots for the elite, they feel let down and are now engaged in some kind of Islamic shaming ritual. Now that I have no inhibitions not to criticize Muslims and Islam when it’s called for, they’ve embarked on a lame social media jihad against me for rebuking their co-religionists ransacking Europe. I detailed the mentality and agenda of these Muslim “truthers” in the video below.

https://vimeo.com/217642960

Their agenda is to make Muslims appear to be harmless innocent patsies that can do no wrong in the hopes of bringing more Muslims to the West to further their religious mission to Islamicize the world for Allah. That’s why they set out to “prove” every act of violence by Muslims is a “false flag.” They’re also operating on the dogmatic religious assumption that Islam and Muslims are morally perfect, therefore any Muslim who does wrong is not acting in the name of Islam but some external factor, or was simply framed by evil non-Muslims looking to sully the religion. They’ve aligned with and are aided in this agenda by fanatical anti-war leftists who see and hear no evil beyond what they can pin on “the West”.

Kevin Barrett, for example, describes his activities as a “truth jihad”. A White American convert to Islam, all he does is write skewed propaganda to exonerate Muslims whenever they are involved in acts of violence or terror. He clings onto the most shoddy and dubious “evidence” to declare an event totally staged. He has an agenda – an Islamic one. He admitted in a debate with me that he actually wants to re-establish an Islamic caliphate, letting slip his desire to see the West itself come under Islamic leadership too. On top of that, during the debate he forwarded with vigour an extreme discourse of White guilt, virtually approving of George Soros’ messianic quest to achieve White genocide. That’s what drives these Muslim “truthers”: an Islamic nostalgia for the caliphate and global Muslim rule. That’s why they support the migrants flooding into Europe, hoping to use them as missionaries for Islam in infidel territory and to eventually absorb the continent into the future caliphate. They did it once before during the Moorish invasion and occupation of Iberia, and at least some of them are endeavouring to do it again.

These “truther” Muslims will use the trick of labeling all criticism of their religion “Zionist” or “Neocon” and accuse anyone critiquing them of supporting Israel. This is an idiotic ploy to silence criticism of their culture in much the same way that Zionist Jews beat down their critics with accusations of anti-Semitism. One can easily be critical of both Israel/Judaism and Islam at the same time. That’s actually being consistent because Islam is, at least partially, derived from Judaism. Many concepts in Judaism and Islam are similar, and both cultures harbour hostile attitudes towards those outside the faith. Both cultures are authoritarian and intolerant of free speech, ultimately seeking to dominate the Goyim and Kaffir nations of disbelievers. Islam is an Abrahamic faith and Jews are revered in Islam as a “people of the book”.

These people use the Muslim/Arab conflict with Jews over Palestine to make Muslims and Islam look like the frontier of resistance to Jewish power. But when you look at other areas like mass immigration and the culture war against the West, Jews and Muslims have formed alliances to weaken and subdue indigenous Whites under a backwards Semitic tyranny. Historically, Jews and Muslims have worked closely together to besiege their common foe: Christian Europeans. So don’t let these Muslims fool you into thinking they are front-line opponents of Jewish power agendas when in fact they happily collaborate if it suits their religious/ethnic interest to do so.

This particular clique of largely anonymous social justice warriors congregate on Twitter. Most of them eventually blocked me because they failed so miserably at forming an actual argument. They’re so kooky that they say virtually anyone who doesn’t prioritize pro-Palestine and 9/11 truth activism (issues only Muslims and leftists still care about) is a “shill”; anyone who voices the slightest criticism of Islam is a “neocon”; anyone not being a busy-body sleuthing out the latest “false flag” must work for the CIA or Benjamin Netanyahu. These fringe lunatics are reenacting the “They Live” movie, thinking they have some special anti-spook glasses that enables them to spot covert “shills” and “agents,” which amounts to anyone not dedicating their life to some futile social justice cause to remedy the unfortunate situation some Middle Easterners find themselves in. If these Muslim and leftist nut jobs were serious then they would go get themselves rifles and head over to the Middle East to fight for the causes they claim to believe in. Instead, like total losers, they aimlessly Tweet up a storm to no effect whatsoever.