Duration: 3h 8min 43sec

Topics: First half I cover the controversies surrounding the What is White debate; I show how phenotypes vary widely within European countries & all Euro nations are mixtures of the ancient European tribes; thus the race category should take precedence over the more blurry ethno category; I look at the views of some anthropologists who all included groups from the MENA region as Caucasoid; while some of these people are visibly White & Caucasoid, they are mostly culturally incompatible with Europe; second half I argue with chat about World War II, Churchill, etc.; I go into some info about how Roosevelt was not “philosemitic” & harboured some deep suspicions towards Jews; I look at how the British government passed the “White Paper” on Palestine in 1939 restricting Jewish immigration there, leading to Zionist terrorists attacking the British; that point refutes the idea that the British were “puppets” of Jews or Zionists at this time.

Duration: 3h 49min 54sec

Topics: OMETV session where I confront Jews and Israelis about their fake identity; I call out their grift as a fake ethnicity & they trip over themselves trying to explain what their identity actually is, a religion or “ethnicity”; their status as a fake minority is a political one designed to get the brownie points that all minorities get; take that away & deny their fake distinctness & there’s no more “special rights” for them.

Firstly, Sewell and I used to have a genuine friendship (at least on my end) and I supported him both through promotion and financially. Overall I probably sent him about 1K in crypto to help him deal with his legal issues. I didn’t have to do that, but I thought he was very much on point (and still is) on numerous issues that we face today. He’s an eloquent speaker and passionate representative of White Australian interests with many of the right instincts against the malaise that afflicts Europeans today.

I suspected that whatever gratitude he showed me in the past would quickly evaporate over my change of opinion about Hitler and fascism, the gnostic cult he has committed his life to, which shows that he was never a true friend but only an acquaintance who was using me as a signal boost to propel the ideology.

My views are not as different now as he claims they are. Because he’s a Hitler worshipper with tunnel vision he’s obsessing over this one viewpoint change, which is not even an important one. Anyone who follows my content knows that my political views are largely the same as before, except for this one historical topic. Many less astute people mistake an optical shift for an ideological shift, but they’re not the same thing. But as you can see, I don’t care about winning the approval of other people. I am my own man and have genuine beliefs of my own. I don’t follow trends or cults and if I see issues, contradictions and problems with an ideology that I can’t stand by, then I will call that out no matter who dislikes me because of it.

Sewell has been sucked so far into the rabbit hole of Neo-Nazism and this cultic Hitler worship nonsense that it’ll take a miracle to break him out of that mold. He’s invested far too much of his life into it that he can’t escape it now. If he changes course even slightly, he’ll lose his paypigs and followers. His friend Blair Cottrell wisely warned him about the destructive path he was on with his ridiculous KKK cosplay, cross burnings, and Hitler séance rituals, and how all that does nothing to advance pro-White politics but rather undermines it. I was on Sewell’s side at that time because I was in the cult, but I’ve come to realize how correct Cottrell was about all that jazz over time.

He accuses me here in that clip of being a “bad faith actor” because of my change of view on Hitler. He provides no evidence for this other than that he doesn’t like my views about Hitler. Then he misrepresents what I say about Hitler to create a fake strawman. He says that I say Hitler was anti-White because he fought against White people. That’s not what I argue. If I ever did say that it was a misstatement. What I do say is that Hitler was anti-Slavic, that’s undeniable. You can be pro-German and anti-Slavic at the same time, as Hitler was, which means that Hitler wasn’t “pro-White”. Just as you can be pro-Irish but anti-English, pro-Serb but anti-Croat, pro-Basque but anti-Spanish, etc. That’s different from being anti-White. Those are internal blood feuds among Europeans, which I oppose. Slavs are White, so hating them means you’re not pro-White. “Pro-White” means you love/support all Europeans not just North Western ones.

Hitler’s anti-Slavicism is beyond dispute. I wrote a massive article documenting tons of evidence that Hitler, Himmler, Goebbels, Bormann and others hated the Slavs and viewed them as an inferior race. Here’s a few quotes:

“For the organization of a Russian state formation was not the result of the political abilities of the Slavs in Russia, but only a wonderful example of the state-forming efficacity of the German element in an inferior race. Numerous mighty empires on earth have been created in this way. Lower nations led by Germanic organizers and overlords have more than once grown to be mighty state formations and have endured as long as the racial nucleus of the creative state race maintained itself. For centuries Russia drew nourishment from this Germanic nucleus of its upper leading strata. Today it can be regarded as almost totally exterminated and extinguished.” – Hitler, Mein Kampf, Chapter 14

“Your errors in the domain of foreign policy are explained by your ignorance of racial factors. For example, you are enthusiastic about the Hindu independence movement … you know the Anglo-Saxons have the mission to govern the people they have subdued, precisely in the name of their superiority. The Nordic race is called to dominate the world, and this right must guide our foreign policy. It’s why we cannot envision any rapprochement with Russia, which is a Slavic-Tatar body surmounted by a Jewish head. I knew Slavs from my home country. In the era where a Germanic head ruled the Slavic body, entente was possible, Bismarck outlined this rapprochement before. But today, it would be a crime.” – 1930, Hitler in discussion with Otto Strasser

“Not only in Austria, however, but also in Germany, these so-called national circles were, and still are, influenced by similarly false ideas. A Polish policy, involving a Germanization of the East, was demanded by many and was unfortunately based on the same false reasoning. Here again it was believed that a Germanization of the Polish element could occur by a purely linguistic union. The result would have been catastrophic: A foreign people expressing their foreign thoughts in the German language, thus compromising the dignity and nobility of our own nation by their inferiority.” – Hitler, Mein Kampf, Chapter Two

“The Führer’s verdict on the Poles is scathing. More animals than men, completely dull and amorphous. Next to them a slaughtering class, which is at least the product of the lower classes mixed with an Aryan master class. The filth of the Poles is unimaginable. Their judgment is also nil. Even Lipski believed that a nervous crisis would break out in our country in 8 days during the war. Poor madman! The Führer does not want assimilation with the Poles. They are to be squeezed into their reduced state and left entirely to themselves.” – Goebbels diaries

“The incidents that Sepp Dietrich related to me about the Russian people in the occupied areas are simply hair-raising. They are not a people, but a conglomeration of animals. The greatest danger threatening us in the East is the stolid dullness of this mass. That applies both to the civilian population and to the soldiers. The soldiers won’t surrender, as is the fashion in western Europe, when completely surrounded, but continue to fight until they are beaten to death. Bolshevism has merely accentuated this racial propensity of the Russian people. In other words, we are facing an adversary about whom we must be careful. The human mind cannot possibly imagine what it would mean if this opponent were to pour into western Europe like a flood.” – Goebbels on the Russians, diaries

“The Slavs are to work for us [Germans]. Insofar as we do not need them, they may die. Therefore, compulsory vaccination and German health service are superfluous. THE FERTILITY OF THE SLAVS IS UNDESIRABLE. THEY MAY USE CONTRACEPTIVES OR PRACTICE… ABORTION, THE MORE THE BETTER. Education is dangerous. It is enough if they can count up to 100. At best an education which produces useful coolies for us is admissible. Every educated person is a future enemy. Religion we leave to them as a means of diversion. As for food, they will not get any more than is necessary. We are the masters; we come first.” – Martin Bormann in letter to Rosenberg on Eastern policy

“I am not in the least interested in the fate of a Russian or a Czech. We will take from other Nations the blood of our type that they can give us. If necessary, we will take their children away from them and bring them up in our environment. Whether other peoples live in contentment or starve to death is of interest to me only in so far as we need them as slaves for our culture; otherwise, it does not interest me. If ten thousand Russian women fall from exhaustion while digging anti-tank ditches, it will only interest me to the extent that this anti-tank ditch is ready for Germany.” – Himmler’s speech at a meeting of SS gruppenfuhrers in Poznan on October 4, 1943

There’s much more where that came from. Sewell does not dispute this information, he hasn’t even tried. He can’t because it’s all true. It’s right in his bible, Mein Kampf.

Here’s Sewell getting asked how many Whites Hitler killed:

He first refuses to answer and then says, “Hitler was fighting for White living space”. This is wrong. He was fighting for GERMAN living space AGAINST other White people (Slavs). As I showed in my Lebensraum video, Hitler states explicitly in Chapter 14 of Mein Kampf that he believed the 1914 borders of Germany were insufficient living space not worth fighting for, and that the only way for Germany to become a “great power” again was by expanding East and seizing new land from Russia. It’s all there in black and white.

Sewell is being tricky here by using the term “White” instead of “German” to confuse people. Hitler was not for “Whites” he was for “Germans” only. He disliked other Whites, especially Poles and Russians, because he was trying to otherize them in order to justify invading, subjugating and colonizing their lands for German exploitation as he said in a 1941 meeting.

So according to Sewell, it’s OK to invade and kill Whites so long as you’re doing so to benefit a different group of Whites. This is a brazen contradiction to his alleged “pro-White” worldview. And I very much doubt he would have the same opinion if it were Meds or Slavs invading Nordic countries to expand their living space. He clearly favours GERMAN Whites over Slavic/Polish/Russian (and most certainly Mediterranean) Whites. When you get into the details here, his bias comes out. Natsocs like Sewell are NORDICISTS with a particular fetish for Germany and Germans. They care more about North West Euros than other ones. That’s clear. He’s being dishonest when he says he’s “Pro-White”. His in-group is not “Whites” as a whole, it’s North Western Europeans. I don’t have a huge problem with that in principle, but I do have a big fucking problem with these Nordicists trying to justify colonialism and imperialism against other White people (as they do with Hitler). They call themselves “pro-White” right now because they see a common non-White foe coming in via mass immigration, but when the dust settles on that question, they’ll turn their guns on Meds and Slavs who they truly view as “not White enough” (one drop rule).

If Hitler is not bad for killing millions of Whites, sticking them in slave labour camps and colonizing their land for the exclusive benefit of his ethnic group, then why is Stalin bad for doing all of that? They have no answer. Hitler can do anything and they will support it because it’s a deranged cult.

Moving on from that point, there’s obviously other issues I have with Hitler and fascism, such as its close parallels with Marxism, but I won’t go over that here. I do resent Sewell’s claim that I’m not pursuing the truth intellectually. That’s exactly what I’m doing. I wrote an article about how I changed my view of Hitler after the Russia/Ukraine war started. I saw many parallels between Putin’s justifications for his invasion of Ukraine and Hitler’s for his invasions, and I saw many Neo-Nazis backing Putin on the same grounds that they back Hitler. They must do that because it’s nearly the same policy: German ethnic Lebensraum vs Russian cultural Lebensraum. To denounce Putin for his version of Lebensraum would call into question their defense of Hitler’s.

I resent a lot Sewell’s assertion that I’m a bad faith actor, whatever that means, which he has no proof of. I could easily throw that accusation back at him. In a way he’s forced to say that about me to appease his flock. He’s auditioning to be the next Führer and as such must “defend the faith” (aka cult) against all dissenters left, right and center. He is an intelligent and astute person so I can’t understand why he has embraced such a stupid posture in public with his cosplay antics. He endorses mentally retarded wigger glowops like GDL/Bloodtribe, people that even William Pierce would have denounced as “defective freaks and misfits”.

Sewell’s a hotheaded zealot who gets himself into trouble, maybe on purpose to get some camera time which he seems addicted to. He has said his genius “political strategy” is being a “lightning rod” for government suppression, whatever that’s supposed to accomplish. So how can he hate the Australian government for suppressing him when he says that’s exactly what he wants it to do?

He is a chronic fedposter who has embraced a version of siegetard violent accelerationism; he has praised mass shooter Brenton Tarrant and bragged about trying to recruit him; here he praises the murder of White leftists by blacks; here he is basically calling for race war and the mass murder of “anti-Whites” ; he called Whites in South Africa “disgusting cowards who deserve their fate” because he says they’re not doing enough violence in response to black violence:

He said on Chris Mitchell’s podcast that UK cops deserve to get raped; he pretty clearly used disproportionate force to attack a security guard who grabbed his friend when trying to get some media face-time; the list goes on. All of this berserk behaviour is what one may expect from a true “bad faith actor” looking to get the people who associate with him into legal trouble.

Sewell has criminals in his group and recruits convicted felons as well as prison and biker gang members.

This has been one of my main critiques of the skinhead/neo-nazi scene. It’s full of low-IQ ex-cons. These natsoc groups are glorified prison gangs. Sewell recruits from jails because criminals have little to nothing to lose so they make better “revolutionaries,” in his mind. His hard edge off-putting optics will scare away most normal White people with middle or upper class lifestyles and jobs, so he’s left with looking for members among the less educated and less intelligent lower classes, unskilled labourers, and ex-cons. Hence why modern National Socialism is a notoriously low-IQ movement full of Jerry Springer drama spergs.

Sewell is definitely a step above your average unhinged natsoc spergnat, which I guess he understands and thinks he’s going to make them into better men. But at the end of the day, you’ll be judged by the company you keep and the company he keeps is ugly. I don’t think Sewell’s a “fed” because I’m not a paranoid schizo conspiracy theorist like most natsocs are, but I do think he can’t control his emotions and is drunk on accelerationist Turner Diaries fan fiction, which has led him into this peculiar path to nowhere.

Despite all the ideological and optical disagreements, I don’t wish any harm comes his way in Australia. I fully support the pro-White effort to win back their country, not only in Australia but everywhere. But I cannot endorse him or the company he keeps. I hope one day he can see where he has gone wrong, where he can improve and corrects course into something more productive.

Topics: First half I cover Syrian Ho’s latest plea for support of her Arab people; She’s an ethno-centric Arab who wants to drain White energy, money & resources to help her people who she refuses to fight for; meanwhile she cheered on the destruction of Ukraine as revenge against Whitey; a video from Gaza shows black people there complaining about racism; the Black-Brown power coalition comes undone; second half on OME talking to Israelis & some Europeans about demographic change.

TIPS

Here’s the trailer:

If you wish to support this project, consider a small contribution or becoming a member.

Follow me on Telegram, Twitter and Kick.

“Russia should use its special services within the borders of the United States to fuel instability and separatism,” wrote Dugin. Provoking “Afro-American racists” was key to the strategy, Dugin opined, as that would serve to “introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity.” He further encouraged “all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S. It would also make sense simultaneously to support isolationist tendencies in American politics.”

In this light, the insurgent radical left sweeping America, with Black Lives Matter at the fore, fits neatly within Dugin’s plan to rile up the blacks against White America. Russia has openly been supporting US-based secessionists, as well as separatists in Europe. Leaders of Texan and Californian secession have direct links to Russia. The American libertarian movement, who function as extreme isolationists opposed to any US involvement abroad, are regular pundits on Russia Today and have strong Kremlin ties. They serve Dugin’s plan to isolate America from world affairs, giving Russia a free hand to act and carve out its Eurasian Empire. Crucially, Dugin stresses the need for Russia to align itself with parts of the Muslim world, especially Shiite Iran, and to wield them as an anti-American bulwark of suicidal religious radicals. Stoking up anti-American and anti-Western sentiment across the Middle East and Asia, to isolate the West from these resource rich areas, was key to Dugin’s master plan. He also called for the complete annexation of Ukraine, writing:

Ukraine as a state has no geopolitical meaning, no particular cultural import or universal significance, no geographic uniqueness, no ethnic exclusiveness, its certain territorial ambitions represents an enormous danger for all of Eurasia and, without resolving the Ukrainian problem, it is in general senseless to speak about continental politics. Ukraine should not be allowed to remain independent, unless it is cordon sanitaire, which would be inadmissible.

Those sentiments were echoed by none other than Richard Spencer, who is married to a Russian follower of Dugin.

Dugin’s book reads like a Russian Protocols of Zion, outlining sinister schemes to isolate, undermine and destabilize the US, UK and Europe, strategies which Russia has clearly activated today, thus anointing Russia as the “Third Rome” global superpower. Dugin wrote a more recent paper reiterating some of his 1997 ideas, titled “Principles and Strategy of Coming War,” which outlines Dugin’s strategies for his “spiritual war” against the US and Europe. Notably, influencing and mobilizing dissident elements in America is key to Dugin’s updated strategy. His numerous appearances on the Alex Jones show and his general outreach to Americans during the 2016 election show that he is not simply writing insane texts as intellectual masturbation – he’s actively pursuing these strategies in the public realm.

All of these dirty tactics that Dugin advocates were previously employed by the Russian Communist Party in their war against Western civilization. The communists themselves advocated mobilizing radicalized American blacks against White America, for destabilization purposes. Dugin is simply revamping old communist subversion tactics to infiltrate, divide and conquer the enemies of Bolshevik Russia.

Dugin advances an essentially occultic agenda of chaos magic to instigate the end of the world. A profile on Dugin noted that he,

believes that it is the ultimate theological destiny of Russia to lead modern day Hyperborean societies — including not only Russia, but all of Eurasia, from Korea to India to Portugal — away from a corrupt earthly existence and back to the pure, divine spiritual knowledge of the original Hyperboreans, resulting in the end of our world and the transformation of humanity to a divine existence. (Yes, you read that right — he wants Russia to bring about the end of the world, in pursuit of the spiritual transformation of all of society).

In his research of Russian occultism, journalist Marc Bennetts stumbled on Dugin’s occultist obsession with the apocalypse, writing:

Nevertheless, it appears Dugin’s occult studies continue to have an influence on his apocalyptic thinking: just two years ago, this hardline Russian nationalist thinker lectured in Moscow on the necessity of curtailing the “illusion” that is the planet Earth by bringing about the “end of the world”.

Yet, shockingly, so many lemmings in the alt-right follow and genuflect to this death-worshipping satanist.

Commentary by Brandon Martinez

Lana Lokteff poses an interesting question in her latest video: why would anyone actually want to be a minority? You’ll often see minorities in the West complaining that they’re “not being treated fairly”; not being given “equal rights” or opportunities. Yet why then did they choose to leave their own country where they were most likely part of the majority? Why deliberately put themselves at a disadvantage as a minority?

The reason is that the living conditions in whatever country they came from was obviously so bad that being a minority in a Western country is better than being part of the majority there. Additionally, they know that minorities in the West are not treated badly, but are propped up on a pedestal by the liberal-leftist establishment. They’re handed all kinds of free stuff until they can “get on their feet” in our societies.

This minority whining game is a shaming tactic to guilt whites into relinquishing resources to support the “poor, helpless” minorities in their midst. Minorities are very good at this game. Shaming works like a charm on bleeding-heart liberals, leftists and cucks. But it doesn’t work on strong, nationalist men and women who see through the charade.

Lokteff makes the case that whites are by far a global minority. So while black, brown and Asian people may be “minorities” in Western countries, their races form the majority of the world. Numerous projections have affirmed that in a few short decades, whites could become minorities in our own countries. A recent study out of Canada forecasted that in less than two decades, 7 out of 10 residents of Vancouver will be visible minorities. Despite this drastic decline of white populations around the world, only white Western countries are being subjected to mass immigration. That’s because the globalist “diversity” agenda is precisely designed to make the West less white.

Leftists, in their utopian quest to empower the “underdog,” oddly do not extend any hand of support to the minority white populations in South Africa and Zimbabwe who have been ruthlessly discriminated against for decades. The black President of South Africa Jacob Zuma recently called for the expropriation of white-owned land without compensation. He wants to kick whites off land they’ve lived on for centuries and hand it to random blacks. Imagine if a European leader proposed something like that? They’d be endlessly assailed as the “reincarnation of Hitler.”

Loony leftists side with blacks even when those blacks are the majority because they claim whites once had the upper-hand during colonialism. So in order to right that wrong, it’s okay to commit another wrong: discrimination against whites. The crazy logic of the left has always been that whites cannot ever be victims in any sense, especially not victims of discrimination and state-sanctioned racism as we’re seeing in South Africa today. Therefore, the very impetus driving leftist politics today is a genocidal animus against whites. They want to tear down “white privilege” wherever they claim it exists. And in places where it discernibly doesn’t exist, they will invent it as a boogeyman to keep themselves relevant.

The leftist-minority coalition is growing more brazen in their attacks against whites. And it doesn’t look like they’ll stop any time soon the way things are going.