A new study from a liberal Muslim think tank shows that 84% of sexual grooming cases in the UK were perpetrated by Pakistani Muslim men.
The Daily Mail summed up the report:
The vast majority of men convicted of grooming young white girls – 84 per cent – are of Asian origin, according to a report to be published this week.
The study by the renowned counter-extremism think-tank Quilliam says that of these, seven in ten are believed to be of Pakistani-Muslim heritage.
Asian gangs have deliberately abused white girls because they hold entrenched racist attitudes towards them as being ‘easy targets’ for sex, according to the report, which is based on the testimonies of convicted Asian men during court hearings.
It adds: ‘Girls from the Asian community are seen as commodities to be “protected”, whereas girls from outside of the community are seen as fair game.’
The study – likely to provoke controversy – is written by two British Pakistani authors, who say they hope it will encourage their community to ‘take responsibility’.
The study further validates what we’ve known for years: that many Muslims view white Western women as cattle to be taken into bondage for Islamic pleasure. This debunks the pro-Muslim wing of the anti-Zionist movement who say Muslims are our “friends” in a common struggle. Tricky Muslims will try to convince bleeding heart whites that they’re our friends against Zionism, but really all they want is for gullible whites to virtue signal for Palestine all day while ignoring the Islamization of Europe.
Certain anti-Zionists ignore the open collaboration between Muslims and Jews to derail nationalism in Western countries. Muslims are essentially being used by the Jewish Kalergists as a cultural sledgehammer against white Europe. Jews are using Muslims to break the back of Europe and Muslims are using Jews to erect their savage caliphate over our heads.
The enemy of my enemy is not always my friend.
One thing not to ignore: some Pakis come to Europe to get out of the hell they grew up in and join the civilized world where a more genteel set of values is practiced. These folks are the ones that deserve our sympathy and who will express their gratitude by giving loyalty to their hosts. It doesn’t take a level ten clinical psychologist to sort out who is whom. And it doesn’t do these types any good to allow their thuggish and brutal former countrymen to come harass and intimidate them here as well.
Doing a little investigation, the think tank that put out these stats seem to be a moderate Muslim organization that gets its donations from far right Christian groups that are no doubt backed by Zionist entities https://medium.com/insurge-intelligence/the-quilliam-foundation-is-financed-by-tea-party-conservatives-investigated-by-sam-harris-1e43d54f0bee Maajid Nawazz, one of the founders, went from anti Israel to PR on behalf of Israel. http://www.lbc.co.uk/radio/presenters/maajid-nawaz/israel-hamas-legitimate-defence-terror-isis/ In other words, not to say these things don’t happen or that foreigners are all angels, but take this story with a grain of salt.
Right, because Paki Muslims wouldn’t ever rape infidel girls. Except even in Pakistan they rape and molest little boys.
Again not saying it doesn’t happen or that there are no people of this race that do this, however these stories all need to be questioned. These so called “Think Tanks” may actually be used to push Zionist propaganda, which given the above links I posted, that is probably true.
What we can definitively say is Zionist propaganda is the false claims they make about Hamas rockets and various other bogus justifications to pummel Gaza with bombs. But other than that most of the negative stuff about Islam is true. It really is a backwards 7th century cult hell-bent on conquest of infidel cultures.
Worse, it has an esoteric facet that’s always eager to ally with every totalitarian, anti-national faction in the West. Well-connected, ever-expanding barbarism. The “useful Kaffir” were attracted to this article.
Not quite. From personal experience and actually studying the religion myself, I think a lot of the propaganda against it, is actually false. Don’t get me wrong, there are certain traditions, such as in the hadiths(prophetic and companion narrations which vary in authenticity) that are just flat out backwards. As are certain Shia and Sunni sects that have this is vs them mentality, which contradict quranic teachings such as the following verses:
5:53 says, “… whoso kills a soul, unless it be for murder or for wreaking corruption in the land, it shall be as if he had killed all mankind; and he who saves a life, it shall be as if he had given life to all mankind.”
2:190, says, “Fight in the way of God against those who fight against you, but begin not hostilities. Lo! God loveth not aggressors.”
But if they (both) strive with you to make you join in worship with Me others that of which you have no knowledge, then obey them not, but behave with them in the world kindly, and follow the path of him who turns to Me in repentance and in obedience. Then to Me will be your return, and I shall tell you what you used to do”
[Luqmaan 31:14-15].
Ironically the so called caliphas of the past did not even follow Islamic Jurisprudence. They drank, fornicated, waged war for riches, etc. Even the Ummayid general who invaded Spain did so for no reason other than to gain personal power, which is why the Ummayid caliph called him, so he wouldn’t create his own empire. He was even caught fighting over the spoils and prevented potential converts from converting so that he could jack up the jizya.
My point is, much of what we hear about Islam is false and is done to get the entire world to hate roughly 20% of the world’s population, so that they can justify war(which is still being waged today in Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine etc.) for Jewish Interests, terrorism to implement more “security” etc. I would question this group and others.
Incorrect. There’s a faulty narrative out there, especially in the “truth movement” that since false flag attacks like 9/11 and others have been blamed on Muslims and that there are peaceful Muslims that Islam is a “religion of peace”. It isn’t. For one thing, there are all kinds of whack job Imams anyone can find on the net, and these aren’t Wahhabists. For two, the Quran does preach violence and many other backwards views. Just because there are peaceful verses in the Quran doesn’t mean there aren’t violent verses and Islamophiles love to cherry pick the nice verses and totally ignore their counterparts, or they love to talk about how peaceful Mohammed was in Mecca while totally ignoring what he did in Medina.
David Wood has basically mastered the Quran and he’s made all kinds of good videos about Islam, especially at his YouTube channel. As an example, here is an 8-part series he’s done with Al Fadi here, an ex-Muslim. These dudes know what they’re talking about:
More examples:
Here are the ten verses I cite in the video:
Qur’an 3:32—Say: Obey Allah and the Apostle; but if they turn back, then surely Allah does not love the unbelievers.
Qur’an 48:29—Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and those who are with him are severe against disbelievers, and merciful among themselves. You see them bowing and falling down prostrate (in prayer), seeking Bounty from Allah and (His) Good Pleasure. The mark of them (i.e. of their Faith) is on their faces (foreheads) from the traces of (their) prostration (during prayers). This is their description in the Taurat (Torah). But their description in the Injeel (Gospel) is like a (sown) seed which sends forth its shoot, then makes it strong, it then becomes thick, and it stands straight on its stem, delighting the sowers that He may enrage the disbelievers with them. Allah has promised those among them who believe (i.e. all those who follow Islamic Monotheism, the religion of Prophet Muhammad SAW till the Day of Resurrection) and do righteous good deeds, forgiveness and a mighty reward (i.e. Paradise).
Qur’an 4:24—Also (forbidden are) women already married, except those (captives and slaves) whom your right hands possess. Thus hath Allah ordained (Prohibitions) against you: Except for these, all others are lawful, provided ye seek (them in marriage) with gifts from your property—desiring chastity, not lust, seeing that ye derive benefit from them, give them their dowers (at least) as prescribed; but if, after a dower is prescribed, agree mutually (to vary it), there is no blame on you, and Allah is All-knowing, All-wise.
Qur’an 5:33—The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His apostle and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement.
Qur’an 9:5—Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush. But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then leave their way free. Lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.
Qur’an 9:29—Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day [notice it says “fight those who do not believe,” not “fight people who are attacking you”], nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the Religion of Truth, from among the People of the Book [the people of the book are Jews and Christians], until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
Qur’an 9:73—O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination.
Qur’an 9:111—Surely Allah has bought of the believers their persons and their property for this, that they shall have the garden; they fight in Allah’s way, so they slay and are slain; a promise which is binding on Him in the Taurat and the Injeel and the Quran; and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? Rejoice therefore in the pledge which you have made; and that is the mighty achievement.
Qur’an 47:35—Be not weary and fainthearted, crying for peace, when ye should be uppermost: for Allah is with you, and will never put you in loss for your (good) deeds.
Qur’an 2:106—Whatever communications We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, We bring one better than it or like it. Do you not know that Allah has power over all things?”
http://www.answeringmuslims.com/2014/09/top-ten-quran-verses-for-understanding.html
“or they love to talk about how peaceful Mohammed was in Mecca while totally ignoring what he did in Medina.” Read about the Jews in Medina.
“David Wood has basically mastered the Quran and he’s made all kinds of good videos about Islam, especially at his YouTube channel. As an example, here is an 8-part series he’s done with Al Fadi here, an ex-Muslim. These dudes know what they’re talking about:” PFftt David Wood?
Mastered what? I watched an interesting debate between him and Shabir Ally, he likes to twist things and is far from being an expert. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21dQBUgSyi4
He seems to have a bit of an affection for Jews and Israel as well https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61EPXKEFoCM
I wouldve quoted someone with a bit more merit, like James White.
I wont get into every verse cause frankly I dont have the time. But lets look at a few.
Quran 9:5 read the verse after “If one amongst the Pagans ask thee for asylum, grant it to him, so that he may hear the word of Allah; and then escort him to where he can be secure that is because they are men without knowledge.” [Al-Qur’an 9:6]
Quran 5:33 You might want to read the verse before. “Because of that We ordained for the Children of Israel that if anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder, or for spreading mischief in the land – it would be as if he killed all mankind, and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all mankind. And indeed, there came to them Our Messengers with clear proofs, evidences, and signs, even then after that many of them continued to exceed the limits in the land!” –Quran 5:32
Quran 9:73 Is referring to the expedition of Tabuk in which Ghassanids assassinated the Islamic emissary, thus triggering a war. Islamic scholars all generally agree on this.
I would tread carefully when it comes to answeringmuslims http://www.answeringmuslims.com/2012/08/ahmadinejad-calls-israels-existence.html
Its not a religion of peace, I find it to be a religion of balance.
Agreed and I think we have some commenters on this thread who have not researched into the pakistani muslim grooming problem that is 100% true fact here in the UK. Either that or they have a “hidden . . . now not so hidden” agenda.
Do a bit of internet searching and you will find the evidence.
Try researching “Charlene Downes” “Blackpool” that is a good place to start.
Then maybe try “Rotherham” as another search term in relation to this MUSLIM GROOMING.
The mainstream media always trys to not implicate muslims.
Of course they would do that . . . we know the msm and their tactics.
Good article Brandon. Thanks
When I said agreed it was in response to Brandon’s
“What we can definitively say is Zionist propaganda is the false claims they make about Hamas rockets and various other bogus justifications to pummel Gaza with bombs. But other than that most of the negative stuff about Islam is true. It really is a backwards 7th century cult hell-bent on conquest of infidel cultures.”
Sometimes the thread posts get pushed down the page and it can be difficult to see who the reply is to.
In future I will name who I am replying to.
I was not agreeing with Joe’s comment “its not a religion of peace, I find it to be a religion of balance.”
I was agreeing with Brandon’s comment “It really is a backwards 7th century cult hell-bent on conquest of infidel cultures.”, the tree structure of the thread puts things in a funny order.
Karen Downes on Muslim rape gangs in Blackpool
Text quoted directly from youtube pages.
For those that have followed the story of missing
Blackpool schoolgirl Charlene Downes, her mother
Karen, interviewed here by BNPtv’s Tony Bamber,
provides us with an update to investigations and
her on-going campaign to gain ‘Justice for
Charlene’.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmdytamOcrM
====================================================
Justice for Charlene Downes – Shocking BNPTV
doorstep interview of Crown Prosecution Service
(CPS) North West chief Nazir Afzal. Whilst Mr
Afzal at least has the integrity and respect for
the victim’s mother to answer questions, his
telling condemnation of Lancashire Police is
remarkable.This candid footage begs the question
as to who it is that is responsible for denying
justice to Charlene Downes and her family and for
what purpose. Why is so much effort being put
into sweeping this case under the carpet and why
does the mainstream media not cover this with the
same zeal as they did with Stephen Lawrence? Is
it the policy of the Police and/or the CPS to
official categorise English people as a lower
form of life?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLO1VZxWMIM
================================================
Bleeding heart whites are as trashy as them, if not more. Masochists wouldn’t see the light of day in ascendant, healthy societies.. Leftoids go on and on about “otherization”, but what is seen among many whites today is not stigma, but obsession, fetishization of the beautiful, poor little “other” who needs our help/hospitality/welfare/daughters etc. This is a sick form of egomania/sadomasochism, common in a dying civilization of course.
We “bleeding heart whites” in general prefer to be called Christian. It has never been popular in ‘ascendant’ societies to have compassion on the unfortunate. I guess you will have to find out what mercy means to you when you become ‘descenant’ one day. There is always someone better willing to push ourselves down, and pride goes before the fall. Compassion is not political, but moral. Yet it is as radical an act as can be. I think that you will find the more extreme Jewish supremacists sport much the same attitude as you do, but they aren’t on your side and yet they are very much ‘ascendant’ over much of the world.
No you faggots are trash, don’t cover yourself in religion. Again throwing the “Jew” and “supremacist” thing around, like every imbecile. Another soyboy on the net.
Such verbal abuse is a clear sign of the emptiness of your position and the poverty of your character. I pity you, but all the same would die to protect your right to say so.
You speak like a soyboy, a weakling leftoid, Typical – I got no patience for your type, see it everywhere these days. A weak, effeminate pussy, like so many others – yes you’re absolute trash. And no, I don’t give a rat’s ass about you – I hope a Paki or another enlightened “Other” hurts you badly in the near future. Enjoy!
Joe, lmao. You actually agree with Shabir Ally over David Wood? Shabir Ally didn’t win his debates against David Wood nor against Sam Shamoun. Only an Islamophile or close to it would actually believe Shabir Ally won those debates. Quick question, WHAT part in that David/Shabir vid you put up did David “twist things around”? And anyone can look up any specific Quranic verses David cites from Quranic sites online. I think you’re struggling from a case of you don’t know WTF you’re talking about.
“It’s not a religion of peace but a religion of balance.” you say, meaning you’re an Islamic apologist.
BTW, am I talking to Joe Sigur over here, or are you a different Joe? And yes, I’m aware of David’s belief of the official story of 9/11 and he is a Christian Zionist, but this does not negate or disprove what he says about the Quran or Mohammed.
Did you know, for example, that slavery still exists in the “religion of balance” and slavery in Islam goes all the way back to it’s beginnings?
“Only an Islamophile or close to it would actually believe Shabir Ally won those debates. Quick question, WHAT part in that David/Shabir vid you put up did David “twist things around”?”
No. David and Sam typically shift the narrative from the actual debate. Shabir tends to stay focused on it.
“It’s not a religion of peace but a religion of balance.” you say, meaning you’re an Islamic apologist.”
No im just telling you what ive read and studied, both in an academic environment and on my own.
“BTW, am I talking to Joe Sigur over here, or are you a different Joe? ”
Who is Joe Sigur?
“yes, I’m aware of David’s belief of the official story of 9/11 and he is a Christian Zionist, but this does not negate or disprove what he says about the Quran or Mohammed.”
Suppose you had water and you knew that there was 1 drop of poison in it. Would you still drink it?
“Did you know, for example, that slavery still exists in the “religion of balance” and slavery in Islam goes all the way back to it’s beginnings?”
Nooo! You dont say! Slavery???? OMG!!! You mean the institution that has been around since Humans have walked the Earth? It still hasnt ended by the way. It comes in many different forms as well. Many electronics we buy and jewelry and clothes that is worn is made by slaves. This is a fact.
You ask who is Joe Sigur? Dude, just a couple days ago on Brandon’s ‘Don’t Trust Faith Goldy’ article you replied to my own reply under Joe Sigur’s comment. You didn’t notice his name or your memory is that short or what?
I said, “Only an Islamophile or close to it would actually believe Shabir Ally won those debates. Quick question, WHAT part in that David/Shabir vid you put up did David “twist things around”?”
And you said, “No. David and Sam typically shift the narrative from the actual debate. Shabir tends to stay focused on it.”
And I’m asking you to give SPECIFIC EXAMPLES of how David and Sam “twist and shift things around”. SPECIFIC EXAMPLES…
Well while you’re calling Islam a “religion of balance”, it’s rather fucking odd to me that you’re doing it while Islamic slavery still exists throughout the Middle East and North Africa. Slavery is just one of MANY of da “religion of balance’s” major flaws.
No, I’m Joe Sigur and Brandon is playing racist this year till he gets a new assignment. Those that really want to push the Islam issue are really just pushing goyim wars for Jews, something that’s been occurring over and over since the beginning of colonialism.
Hitler got it right. He named the Jew and kept the focus there. I don’t see anyone doing that here consistently but me.
Anyone who does and doesn’t tolerate same ole same ole, isn’t part of the incrowd, the incrowd that secretly works for Jews and does his bidding while they pretend to be fighting him
Unfortunately it works becasuse the goyim can’t be bothered to question the obvious
Have a good day
Joe T Sigur
Sadly the last part of your comment rings true.
As well as that ,people are unaware of the truth, because the sanitized mainstream media keeps it from them and they are easily led astray by the kosher nationaiist parties that are mostly controlled opposition or in some cases these parties are too scared to make the JQ one of their issues as it would be political suicide . . . or so they think.
American public are even more deceived than the europeans , , , mainly because of your controlled TV and other media. Europe is becoming a tinder box (again).
Joe knows practically nothing about Marxism. It’s like if you asked him about feminism: to him, learning about all the anti-male laws, biased family courts, and about all the misandry in Western society coming from every angle is “distracting from the Jew”. Dudes getting the screws left and right in the West, but don’t worry about any of that because it “distracts from the Jew”. He probably can’t even name many Jews behind radical feminism or where it started. It’s “too much work” n stuff and/or it “causes too much division between men and women” n stuff.
“Something that’s been occurring over and over since the beginning of colonialism”… well tell us when colonialism first started, and tell us about Muslim colonialism, Joe… they “dindu/dondu nuffin like that”, right?
Dana
That might be true regarding Joe T Sigur.
However it can be a big mistake to under estimate people, or assume what they do know, or do not know.
This is best illustrated in real life, away from the internet.
For example, we all know the scenario, where a conversation steers towards a subject where we have done years of daily research and analysis and are in a good position to give our opinion.
The person we are talking to has only absorbed like a sponge the mainstream narrative.
He will probably tell you he has talked to other knowledgeable people.
That person may not be open to anything outside the mainstream because of all the brainwashing. They also have a short attention span, or are not very patient (maybe due to medication or personality factors) and you only get 1 to 2 minutes to speak before they switch off or change the subject.
The point is they go away thinking you are wacky and a conspiracy nut.
In fact you are not as stupid as you look and you know 100 times more than they do.
Dorset, you’re talking to the wrong dude over here. You should be telling that to Joe; the dude is a dimwit.
You didn’t find any issue with what he was saying, like this?
“No, I’m Joe Sigur and Brandon is playing racist this year till he gets a new assignment. Those that really want to push the Islam issue are really just pushing goyim wars for Jews, something that’s been occurring over and over since the beginning of colonialism.”
What he’s saying is that Brandon exposing Islam is “playing racist”, yet we don’t find Joe exposing any of the mounds of blatant racism against whites – whether it’s from Muslims, blacks, or any other group out there… he wants to play libtard and white knight for non-whites. Let’s just say it’s a very good guess that the only group of people Joe has labelled ‘racist’ besides Jews, is whites, and Brandon hasn’t said anything here even remotely “racist”.
And if you didn’t catch it, Joe said: “Brandon is playing racist this year till he gets a new assignment” … stating as a fact that Brandon is some kind of shill “taking orders” from wherever Joe imagines he’s taking them from.
Joe is a fucking schmuck who will likely go to the grave thinking exposing anything or any group is “diverting attention from the Jew”. He’s had the same, lame ass dilettante philosophy for years. You can’t teach that delusional old dog new tricks.
Dana
I was agreeing with you. “That might be true regarding Joe T Sigur.”.
Then I made a general comment for everyone (not directed specifically at you) regarding being careful when jumping to conclusions about people,.
I did this by turning the tables and giving an example where people criticise or misjudge us (to illustrate how the assuptions are often incorrect)..
However you have given ample evidence regarding Joe T Sigur, so the assumptions are correct and it seems that did the trick with him and he went away or got moderated, whichever.
When accusations and insults start flying, threads descend into tit for tat insults and bad language.
My friendly comment applied to everyone if they want to take note of it. Joe included. However I am sure everyone already knows all this, having found out for themselves.
Sorry for being a tad condescending in my previous comment I should have tacked it on a new branch of the thread and not named any names . . . then it is a “general tip”.
And Dana I agree with you 100%.
I was not agreeing with Joe’s attack on Brandon, I hope that is obvious.
I saw an element of truth in Joe’s ‘incrowd’ message however not in the context of Brandon or of most people here.
I wrongly took his comment to be a general criticism of the zio shills everywhere, which I do see everywhere.
I should not have fallen into that trap. Sorry.
He was targeting Brandon in the first part of his comment, which is why I said “Sadly the LAST PART of your comment rings true”.
I am actually glad I rattled your cage because you have responded with an excellent expansion and clarification.
Thanks.
Dawg, it’s da “religion of balance” n sheeeit. What kind of a fukin clown says such a thing? We can just go on and on and on about the so-called “religion of balance”. I think you just don’t like researching things and thinking for yourself. You remind me of Joe Sigur, BTW…
Pfftthahahaha man you try HARD. WTF? Who the fuck is this clown. Ive researched alot. Like I said ive actually learned in an academic environment and on my own. Of course also first hand experience in a Muslim country. You are one funny goose. You remind of a thing that goes durrr durr….a retard to be specific.
http://materiaislamica.com/index.php/Accusations_of_Necrophilia_in_Islam
Hey douchebag, you had first hand experience in a Muslim country and so now you just know “all about Islam” do you? Like I’ve never been to any Muslim countries myself. It possibly might be you who is try hard over here; you’re trying very hard to be a stupid douchebag, or maybe you’re not trying at all and it just comes naturally to you.
OMG your article “debunked” da “false accusation” of necrophilia in Islam! If a Muslim tells you there is no such thing as necrophilia in Islam or drinking camel urine or child sex slaves or inbreeding, you can “trust” the Muslim… “no” Muslims would ever try to deny any and every wrongdoing in Islam or anything! Just joking, fool…
“An Egyptian religious scholar has been ordered to stay off the air after he made the grave error of arguing in favour of necrophilia with a ruling that allows husbands to have sex with their dead wives.
Egypt’s state media watchdog on Monday banned Sabri Abdel Raouf from making television and radio appearances over his deadly serious religious edict on so-called “goodbye intercourse”, according to daily Youm7.
The professor of comparative jurisprudence at al-Azhar University, widely viewed as the Sunni Muslim world’s leading Islamic institution, made the remarks last week on a local television programme.
“People who do this are perverts, I mean she is dead, how could anyone accept such a thing,” Abdel Raouf said when asked if the act was permissible.
“However, is it considered adultery? If husbands do this they are going against societal norms, but they are not punished in the manner of adulterers.”
“It is permissible even though it is a shameful, unnatural act,” he added.
The scholar argued that because some schools of Islamic thought allow spouses to wash the bodies of their deceased partners before burial – this also technically allows intercourse.
Sabri Abdel Raouf [YouTube]
Reports on the scholar’s grisly remarks exploded in local media, prompting a tsunami of condemnation from clerics and commentators alike.
Abdel Raouf on Saturday reappeared on another television programme to explain his words had been misconstrued.
“I was responding to a question about a fatwa issued by another cleric, who deemed it permissible. I wish I had known that people would care so much about such a silly issue”.
“An animal wouldn’t do that with a dead female, so how would a human do it?” he added, refusing to apologise for his endorsement of the ruling.
Azhar University has announced it has summoned Abdel Raouf for questioning over his “unauthorised media appearances”.
The issue of sexual intercourse with dead wives first arose in 2011, when controversial Moroccan cleric Zamzami Abdul Bari ruled that husbands could sleep with their partners during a period of six hours after their passing.
Egyptian clerics have been known to make some bizarre rulings – so this may be par for the corpse.”
https://www.alaraby.co.uk/english/Blog/2017/9/19/Rigor-mortifying-Egyptian-cleric-muzzled-after-sex-with-dead-wife-ruling
“Egypt’s National Council for Women (NCW) has appealed to the Islamist-dominated parliament not to approve two controversial laws on the minimum age of marriage and allowing a husband to have sex with his dead wife within six hours of her death according to a report in an Egyptian newspaper. ”
https://english.alarabiya.net/articles/2012/04/25/210198.html
http://www.answering-islam.org/Shamoun/bestiality.htm
Da Quran is just “amaaaazing” init? Try actually watching the fucking video this time…
Lol cute….typical arguments. Heard it all before. Unfortunately most of you are all the same….Anyways Dana I sincerely hope the best for you. You seriously have way too much time on your hands. Go get yourself a girl and maybe go outside once in a while.
“Thanks” for watching and reading the content, and “thanks” for “answering” my question as to WHAT SPECIFICALLY David and Sam were twisting and shifting in their debates with Shabir (because you obviously can’t answer). The “you have too much time on your hands” argument is pathetic as well because you’ve been having this conversation here as long as I have, but you’ll continue shilling for Islam and claiming it’s a “balanced religion” when it sure as shit isn’t. Yeah, lemme just “convert” to Islam now because it’s so “sophisticated” n sheeeit, lmao.
Yeah yeah yeah. Make an appointment with a psychologist, I can tell you have some issues. Perhaps ptsd.
My issues are that I can’t stand dummies who don’t know WTF they’re talking about but they absolutely can’t refrain themselves from inserting their ill-informed and lopsided fucking thoughts opinions.
Thanks to Islamophiles such as yourself, the West is importing untold millions of culturally, religiously, and racially incompatible Muslims who are often low-IQ and who increase crime, tension, no-go zones, and welfare use at the expense of the whites in these lands, many of whom are indigenous. I think people like you should be deported and/or beheaded in the name of Allah.
the fact is Dana, you can’t determine what kind of goy on goy issues you truly have till you get the behind the curtain Jew issue on stage All Muslims I meet in Atlanta are nice people. The crazy ones are trained crazy to do the bidding of the mob which is why Israel is never attacked
Expose the Jewish problem, disempower him, and then see what’s still left to resolve. Whatever is left will cake walk
By the way Dana, who are you associated with? Your name is very familiar
The issue isn’t that there aren’t nice ‘Muslims’ out there. The issue is that, as a rule, Muslims are Muslim first, and a large number are also advocates for Sharia law while harboring other odd beliefs they’ve gotten from the religion, making them seriously incompatible with other cultures. In small numbers, Muslims are nicer as a group to others, and this changes as their numbers grow.
They also tend to be quite SJW minded, and so if you’re an anti-Zionist and you defend Islam, you’ll find Muslims will be a lot nicer to you than somebody who critiques Islam. When you start actually critiquing Islam, Muslims aren’t so ‘nice’. Another f’d up thing is that if you’re pointing out any of the ongoing anti-white agenda, you’ll also piss a lot of Muslims off because a lot of Muslims are anti-white themselves, but you won’t often know it until you start talking about the issues. Anti-white issues like rapidly declining white populations, tax money being stolen from whites via corrupt governments and given to “minority” groups like Muslims, increased crime, etc., etc.
Yeah my name probably looks familiar because I’ve been around in a lot of different circles. I’ve just never understand how/why people can pick up a new red-pill/paradigm, but then they stay with that paradigm while shunning all the other obvious ones. There is some truth to the expression that you can’t teach an old dog new tricks.
Why don’t you convert to Islam and move to Iran or Saudi Arabia to be with your precious Muslims then? You’re a libtard race-mixer who wants us to virtue signal for Arabs, Muslims and Palestinians while ignoring the Islamization of Europe. You follow a modified Kalergi philosophy that we can all get along and sing kumbaya together in a multicultural, multiracial melting pot if not simply for the racist Jews pushing us apart. You’re a stupid clown and pawn of Jewish globalism.
Brandon I don’t think that’s what he said at all.
Well if you read the whole thread properly instead of only parts of it.
You will see that the thread replies structure caused my statement “agreed” to appear directly under Joes comment, however if you line up vertically you will see the reply I made was answering Brandons comment.
I was saying “agreed” to Brandon.
Here are the immediate clarifications that I posted when I realised the post had gone down in the wrong place.
So you have got me completely wrong and should apologise.
Here are the two posts that clarify I was agreeing with Brandon.
Dorset Patriot says:
December 19, 2017 at 10:41 pm
When I said agreed it was in response to Brandon’s
“What we can definitively say is Zionist propaganda is the false claims they make about Hamas rockets and various other bogus justifications to pummel Gaza with bombs. But other than that most of the negative stuff about Islam is true. It really is a backwards 7th century cult hell-bent on conquest of infidel cultures.”
Sometimes the thread posts get pushed down the page and it can be difficult to see who the reply is to.
In future I will name who I am replying to.
Dorset Patriot says:
December 19, 2017 at 10:49 pm
I was not agreeing with Joe’s comment “its not a religion of peace, I find it to be a religion of balance.”
I was agreeing with Brandon’s comment “It really is a backwards 7th century cult hell-bent on conquest of infidel cultures.”, the tree structure of the thread puts things in a funny order.
So please go back over the thread and try to calm down.
You are misquoting me due to you not understanding the error in the thread.
Hopefully you will realise your error and apologise.
Thanks
My reply above was in response to Dana however I am getting confused now as I read something where I thought Dana was criticising me but now realize that was an old comment from 18th december. So sorry for the misunderstandings.
At least I have made it clear I don’t agree with Joe T Sigur and never did, I only found one tiny part rang true, regarding zio shills generally (certainly not applicable to Brandon or anyone here, well not that I can see).
If you check out my website you will see who I support and it ain’t Islam or Zionists.
The loose layout of this commenting system can make it difficult to follow and I easily get confused by this . . . sorry.
Useful Kaffirs expose themselves. Moralizing masochism, always posing fake superiority “you’re all the same”, Soy Latte boys. No problem in being replaced by an hostile culture at all. Always throwing this “Zionist” knee-jerk response automatically – disliking both sides seems unthinkable to these retards. As I said before, the anti-Zionist position (though legitimate) has become a rallying point for some of the most toxic/damaged people around. #GenerationSoy
Disliking everyone seems like a distinct possibility here. And a strict scientific determinism based upon diet and possibly genetics.
Faggot strikes again. Know the difference between “both sides” and “everyone”? Or what “metaphor” is? Not only a weak pussy, but illiterate.
I decided to find out whether Erin go Bragh means anything or whether it is an anagram or pseudonym.
It means “Ireland Forever”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erin_go_bragh
So that is interesting . . . to me anyway.
And your earlier comment shows you are not a totally bad sort.
Just different views to various people here.
You have said you agree with some of the things I said, but in most cases that was after I complained to you that you were going off on a tangent and skipping the main issues I was trying to highlight to you.
You are tending to sympathise with the poor immigrants which is a noble thing to do (as you said you are christian) however when I ask you to focus on the pakistani muslim grooming problem in the UK, you ignore my comments.
People are quick to spot these tactics.
It is bound to cause suspicion . . . and in some cases a strong reaction.
People are very angry.
The liberals and multiculturalists lecturing to us their warped ideals is the last thing we need.
Well, Dorset Patriot, if I was king I would see the human traffickers hanged in the public square.
Erin
Hopefully then, one day in the not too distantf future, King Erin will get his way. Then our green and pleasant land can return to normal.
You take care Erin.
God bless.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dave_Allen_%28comedian%29
As Dave Allen used to say
“Goodnight, thank you, and may your God go with you.”
Incidentally . . . I know and I think most people here know that Wikipedia is biased on certain political issues.
That said, even the biased articles are useful and if you know what to look for, and what to be wary of, you can still extract valuable information.
It is such a wonderful resource (trump would probably repeat that ‘such a wonderful resource’ just for emphasis) . . . especially on non-controversial issues and it is free and it does not dish adverts.
So I recommend donating to them if they ask . . . not every time though, just once in a while.
That will hopefully keep Wikipedia like it is and also make you feel good in giving something back to it.
I donated a small amount to them.
Then next day I read something on there I strongly disagreed with (controversial item). That’s okay though.
If anyone is good at finding old video clips from satellite tv, then please go looking for this one from 2010 which I watched live in the uk and wish that I had recorded it.
Evening of Friday 15th October 2010 received by satellite hotbird in the UK.
MTA | Muslim Television Ahmadiyya International
MTA International
http://www.mta.tv/
QUOTE FROM a commenter “kjv12” (that was me) in the comments section of ChristchurchPeople online newspaper(Dorset), it is no longer on the web, now only on webarchive (waybackmachine).
QUOTE
LAST NIGHT 15/10/10 on one of the MTA satellite TV channels there were 3 wise presenters with their customary headgarb defending their islamic beliefs regarding age of consent. This program took place in a studio with english audio and behind the presenters on the wall there was a light coloured map of the region, with Pakistan highlighted in a dark colour. The next bit will shock you, so look away if you want to remain blinkered and go and watch your Astra 2 ‘sky minidish’ programs. One of the presenters was stating that in hot countries young girls reach puberty earlier, the earliest recorded was 5 years old and the youngest to give birth was 6 years old. He then went on to justify their perverse laws on the age of consent by saying it is therefore perfectly normal for girls of 7, 8, 9 or 10 to . . . I won’t go on, but they were quoting the name of a prophet and some praise for him, at every opportunity.
Do we really want our culture in Britain to be influenced by Islam and Sharia law? Well the government is doing a good job of it by aiding the Islamification of Britain.
About a year ago on Arabic Al Jazeera I also watched a news item about executions somewhere in Africa. So this was the no-holds-barred Arabic version in Arabic (not the English version of it you see on freeview) highlighting horrors that were occuring in Africa and this looked pretty recent to me. These executions will stay in my mind forever. 2 people on crutches being pushed to the centre of a group of at least 10 dead people lying face down in the dusty desert, The people on crutches were then shot in the back and the gunman walked around putting extra bullets into peoples’ backs to make sure they were dead, their bodies recoiling from the ground with each gunshot. This was not some western video game, many of which in my opinion should be censored (in one game the game player is able to enter a hospital and shoot everyone) but real life, as aired on international satellite TV.
Yes asylum seekers are in many cases trying to flee such horrors, but they should not make a bee-line for the Soft Touch UK by crossing up to 20 borders to arrive here. International Law requires them to go to the nearest neighbouring country. By breaking this law they have become illegal immigrants.
By kjv12 at 09:51 on 16/10/10
END QUOTE
https://web.archive.org/web/20131006014107/http://www.christchurchpeople.co.uk/news/BNP-ask-support-Christchurch/story-10008486-detail/story.html
I am no longer with the BNP, but I was then.
The MTA studio discussion 15/10/2010 shocked me and I was kicking myself afterwards for not having recorded it.
It is an official muslim channel condoning the pedo aspects of their culture.
Someone, somewhere must have recorded it.
GCHQ can you help here please?
Yes, I agree. They should follow the law and seek assylum in a neighboring country. The demographics are pretty clear, Britain cannot contain all of the oppressed people in the world, nor even a fraction. And there is too often a substantial economic motive involved both among refugees and smugglers. Were it not for the perception of easy money in the West, people might make more practical choices about where to go. On the other hand, there are cases where due to lawlessness and porous borders, a neighboring country simply is not far enough away to escape from persecution and organized crime following a person. This is particularly true in the Middle Eastern countries which are torn by war; Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq and so forth. To these people the danger of retribution is very real.
Well yes that is true. That deals with the concluding part of my 2010 post where I digressed from the main point of my post.
The main point being . . . I will now clarify.
If you dig in the web archive for earlier captures of that ChristchurchPeople article there are further comments by several liberal multiculturalists one is ‘valderd’.
The thread had bounced back and forth, every time I tried to counter the liberal ‘progressives’ . . . that Friday night 15th October 2010 you will see a comment from ‘valderd’.
I had had enough of him/her and responded with a final post that evening.
QUOTE
valderd. Your patronising tone, shows you for what you are. Condescending and extremely insulting. I am not xenophobic or racist. I am not one to bicker either and have not once spoken down to you. I have merely defended my position and highlighted the unfair treatment the BNP gets from BNP detractors.
I for one, completely disagree with your stance and all of your arguments.
You are pro establishment anti bnp and good luck to you.
You won’t change my views and clearly, you are not going to budge an inch.
I don’t have time to argue with you on every policy of the BNP, there is already plenty of information from your side of the argument in the general press, our arguments are available at bnp.org.uk.
The campaign to ‘Support Our Troops – Bring Our Boys Home’ is doing a very good job of alerting the public to the senseless and costly war in Afghanistan. More details from the BNP website. Obviously indivudual BNP members’ comments are their own opinions and not necessarily those of the British National Party.
END QUOTE
I then turned off the computer and turned on the TV and channel hopped, finally stumbling upon a discussion on a muslim channel (mentioned in my last post above), which had a voice-over in english.
So . . . bearing in mind I was already ‘fired up with having had a belly full for one day of someone spouting the wonders of diversity and enrichment, I then get to see and hear the real life actual uncomfortable truths directly from the horses mouth on a muslim channel defending their non-western values regarding muslim men and little girls.
I watched the program, memorizing what they were saying and next day in the morning at 9am on Saturday 16th October 2010 I made went back to the thread where the libtards had been giving me a hard time.
I then posted the comment.
I will focus on that again just in case you missed it.
It is about the discussion on MTA voiced over in english, condoning non-western values regarding age of consent.
Here it is again.
QUOTE
LAST NIGHT 15/10/10 on one of the MTA satellite TV channels there were 3 wise presenters with their customary headgarb defending their islamic beliefs regarding age of consent. This program took place in a studio with english audio and behind the presenters on the wall there was a light coloured map of the region, with Pakistan highlighted in a dark colour. The next bit will shock you, so look away if you want to remain blinkered and go and watch your Astra 2 ‘sky minidish’ programs. One of the presenters was stating that in hot countries young girls reach puberty earlier, the earliest recorded was 5 years old and the youngest to give birth was 6 years old. He then went on to justify their perverse laws on the age of consent by saying it is therefore perfectly normal for girls of 7, 8, 9 or 10 to . . . I won’t go on, but they were quoting the name of a prophet and some praise for him, at every opportunity.
Do we really want our culture in Britain to be influenced by Islam and Sharia law? Well the government is doing a good job of it by aiding the Islamification of Britain.
. . . .
then
. . . .
END QUOTE
AND QUOTING (again my previous post here on this thread).
https://web.archive.org/web/20131006014107/http://www.christchurchpeople.co.uk/news/BNP-ask-support-Christchurch/story-10008486-detail/story.html
I am no longer with the BNP, but I was then.
The MTA studio discussion 15/10/2010 shocked me and I was kicking myself afterwards for not having recorded it.
It is an official muslim channel condoning the pedo aspects of their culture.
Someone, somewhere must have recorded it.
GCHQ can you help here please?
END OF ALL QUOTES
Okay I hope the point of my post here is clearer now than it was.
I had decided to put in the full unedited ChristchurchPeople post, but it was too long winded in digressions.
Sorry about that, I will try to be more to the point in future.
I would like to get archive footage of that MTA TV show . . . anyone know the best way to go about that please?
Yes, I see what you are saying clearly now. I validate your position entirely, and in no way wish to invite those practices into Christian society. (And by the way have been much in favor of bringing the troops home too, as an aside.) What is being lost in the mass movement of people to Europe is any kind of qualitative judgment, informed and reasonable selection. This is quite on purpose it seems, since the stated goal of those making the policy is to replace the natives with less intelligent wage slaves, not save victims of atrocities. As long as this situation exists, how can it either serve charity or country? It gives scarce immigration positions in Western countries to mercenary adventurers, excluding the truly needy. And when this happens, the immigrant is not really grateful and tries to import an alien culture with them, rather than aspiring to assimilate to civilized norms. I consider the whole scheme to be a mockery of Christian values, a perversion of the purpose of the social safety net and the meaning of charity. In essence, throwing our pearls to swine and our bread to the dogs that our own children go poor and hungry — not what was intended. But it has been made aboundantly clear by people like Alan Greenspan explaining that his economic policy can be summed up as “increasing insecurity in the working class”.
https://mobile.nytimes.com/1997/02/27/business/job-insecurity-of-workers-is-a-big-factor-in-fed-policy.html?referer=https://www.google.ie/
This tidal wave of immigrants is just for the purpose of providing willing scabs, breaking the social safety net, and browning Europe into a non-Christian future — and it hypocritically pretends to accomplish enlightened and moral goals all the while, while doing the opposite.
Erin
Very important to stay on topic here . . . the title of this article is . . .
“Paki Muslims Behind 84% of Grooming Cases in UK”
and importantly I was drawing to everyone’s attention some extremely RELEVANT information regarding Pakistani Muslims and their culture of condoning underage child molestation.
However . . . it seems every time I draw attention to it – you post material that quickly leads away from relevant information.
Do you not want to address the main points I made or maybe want other people to miss my points?
Please stay on topic.
Do you have any extra information regarding “Paki Muslims Behind 84% of Grooming Cases in UK” ?
Thanks and sorry if I am misunderstanding your motives.
Now I am off topic in an on-topic kind of way.
Useful observation, hopefully..
I have decided to refrain from quoting the texts of people I disagree with, as the rotten search engines often cherry pick parts of paragraphs and sentences, taking my name and then a text snippet that I am quoting, that I disagree with,, to try to make it look as though I agree with something that I don’t.
Not paranoia . . . yes paranoia it has happened many times.
I have seen this many times in the results of search engines.
Google are clearly working against us in this respect.
It is also the job of trolls to lead us into these traps.
The enemy tries every trick in the book and they are good at it.
You can almost sense they get a kick out of it and are enjoying winding us up.
So be careful folks and don’t get dis-heartened.
https://www.thelocal.se/20171219/five-men-acquitted-in-fittja-rape-case?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
A Swedish court has acquitted five men accused of raping a woman and being complicit in her rape in Stockholm suburb Fittja in 2016, saying there was insufficient evidence to convict them of the crimes.
That’s Sweden for you.
http://martinezperspective.net/2017/12/05/immigrants-are-destroying-sweden/
Sweden was once one of the most harmonious and prosperous nations in Europe where crime was unheard of. But that was when Sweden was 99% white Swedish. Now, with its vast immigrant population, Sweden has become the rape capital of Europe, plagued by rising crime.
Our particular problem here in the UK is highlighted by the title of this article / thread.
http://martinezperspective.net/2017/12/17/paki-muslims-behind-84-of-grooming-cases-in-uk/
“Paki Muslims Behind 84% of Grooming Cases in UK”
Charlene Downes – Public Inquiry Now! (2012)
Dorset, no worries. Well, as Joe Sigur says: “Unfortunately it works becasuse the goyim can’t be bothered to question the obvious”. What he hasn’t realized and probably never will as that neither can the kuffar.
It’s like the so-called “1001 Islamic inventions”. If Islamophiles can ever be bothered to actually research them and talk to Muslims about it, they’ll find that all kinds of Muslims really believe they all truly were invented by Muslims, and even more than 1001 inventions. One hilarious thing about it is that pro-blacks also believe that they invented a good portion of the same inventions, if not all of them.
As per Marxism, in the West, every so-called “minority group” (from Jews, to Muslims, to blacks, to women, to Amerindians, to Hispanics, to homosexuals, to transgenders, and even to Asians by an extent and children these days) is instilled with a victimhood (perpetually unfairly ‘persecuted’), entitlement, and superiority complex, all at the hands of the evil, lazy, raycis, white, male, heterosexual, cisgender, Christian demon, as the minority groups’ crimes and shortcomings are not only diminished in many ways, but also flat-out covered up in the MSM, history books, and by leading politicians. One doesn’t have to get any of this simply out of the Babylonian Talmud, Kabbalah, or Quran. Worse than that, each “minority group” gets all kinds of TLC and support for their causes by the white, male, heterosexual, cisgender, Christian demon. If the latter group is taken out of the equation, what gets revealed is all these “lovely” minoritaaay groups just don’t get along, to say the least, lol.
Correct Dana.
And try typing “white father with kids” or “white woman with kids” into Google under the IMAGES tab in Google (or even duckduckgo).
Then (you mentioned inventions) type “American Inventors”.
With all of the above you get mainly non-white or mixed race people in the images.
That is 100% proof google hates white people.
Trouble is, ordinary people are getting used to this and don’t even notice, or are not bothered by it.
However, as Brandon often points out, all the blatant anti-white propaganda will drive more whites to the right.
“But other than that most of the negative stuff about Islam is true. It really is a backwards 7th century cult hell-bent on conquest of infidel cultures.”
Much of the “negative stuff” about Islam, is stuff that you too espouse. Islam espouses a patriarchal society. It recognises the inferiority of women’s intelligence, and the potential chaos wrought in granting the reins of society in the hands of women. Islam doesn’t tolerate gayism, lesbianism, incestism, trangenderism, bestialism, etc. and all the other perversions of nature aggressively promoted by the satanists who are in control of the world today. In fact, Islam in its original orthodox form – the 4 Madh-habs (schools) promulgated by the Islamic Empire in general for 1400 years before its collapse, and which acted as the primary bulwark against these satanists – would demand the execution of all the animal perverts described above in whose lives Islamic lifestyle is wholly absent.
It is disingenuous, to say the least, to attribute to Islam such crimes for which Islam itself prescribes the harshest of punishments. The issue of legal concubinage during an era of worldwide slavery requires elaboration and is a separate one altogether that has nothing to do with the bestial, adulterous, and perverted crimes of uneducated scoundrels with Muslim names who smoke, drink, fornicate, swear, and perpetrate every other unislamic action, and who have fully “assimilated” themselves into the sexualised culture and environment promoted by the satanists at the helm of world affairs.
Salafi “Islam” and modernist “Islam”, which openly admits to departing from the orthodox and “backward” Islam of 1400 years as represented by the 4 schools of thought, and which is the “Islam” adopted by zionist-supported groups such as ISIS, Boko Haram, al-Qaeda, cannot be said to represent those very same 4 schools of thought which such ideologies admit to mutilate.
However, other than your comments and/or misconceptions about Islam, much of what you write is true.