Leftist, pro-Democrat lawyer, Michael Avenatti, also known as “creepy porn lawyer” for representing the abominable whore/washed up porn actress Stormy Daniels in her fraudulent lawsuits against Donald Trump, is under fire from the leftist lynch mob because he said that a “white male” should lead the Democrats and the leftist crusade against other white males.
From the Washington Examiner:
Attorney Michael Avenatti is an aspiring 2020 Democratic presidential candidate, but his assertion that the party’s next presidential nominee should be a white male has fellow Democrats turning on him.
“Saying something like that is the quickest way not to get the Democratic nomination for president,” Brad Bannon, a Democratic strategist, said.
Avenatti made the comments about Democrats’ 2020 presidential nominee during an interview with Time magazine published Thursday.
Avenatti’s full quote was this:
I think it (the 2020 Demcratic Presidential candidate) better be a white male.
One of the reasons why I’ve been effective with women — and others, but especially with women — is because I think it’s different when you have a white male making the arguments,” he continued. “I think they carry more weight. Should they carry more weight? Absolutely not. But do they? Yes.
The evil bastard Avenatti went on to clarify that he was making the point that white males like him can serve as useful idiot frontmen in the left’s crusade against “white male privilege”:
2/2 – Just as an example, look at the excerpt below re my efforts representing women. You will see a portion of the quote they used in the story but not the entire quote. They also fail to include the question for context. I have nothing to hide. Time is hiding the truth. #Basta pic.twitter.com/rcXLYcwtXy
— Michael Avenatti (@MichaelAvenatti) October 28, 2018
So the creepy porn lawyer essentially suggested that a white male face be put on the Marxist crusade to disenfranchise white males in America because it will have more weight behind it. Hilarious.
Avenatti is a huge feminist mangina who trots out lying skanks to smear conservative white men, like he did with Trump and Kavanaugh. He seems to be gearing up for a 2020 run for president on an anti-white male, fembot ticket.
Every nominee for the Dem party in 2020 must commit to a gender balanced cabinet – 50% women/men. The lack of female cabinet members over the years is a disgrace. The time has come. No more excuses. #Basta
— Michael Avenatti (@MichaelAvenatti) October 29, 2018
But the suggestion that a white male lead anything, including the anti-white cause, is a bridge too far for the radical left. Avenatti is learning that the Marxist Left don’t want white people leading anything at all, especially not their cause to destroy our race. The Marxist Left even call white feminists “racists” partaking in “white privilege” for not showing enough deference to their non-white counterparts.
Avenatti is now on the ropes pleading with his leftist support base to forgive his comments as they were spoken with good, anti-white intentions after all.
Poor cunts…
I’m confused about this whole thing stemming back to how we define White People. My Y-DNA haplogroup is I2-L801 (stemming from Danish Vikings settling with Hrolfr the Walker in Normandy) and I could reasonably claim that haplogroup I men are the original White Men of mesolithic Europe and that the Aryans (R1a, R1b) are central Asian invaders who imposed their Asiatic language identity onto Europe.
Haplogroup R is a subclade of haplogroup K, which itself is a subclade of haplogroup IJK where the three bloodlines of I, J, and K stem from. Furthermore, haplogroup R is a sister-clade to haplogroups N and O, which are the dominant haplogroups amongst northern and eastern Asian men.
Are the Greeks white? If so, what do we do with those that have the north African haplogroup E1b? It makes up close to 50% of the Y-DNA lineages in Achaia, Euboia and Roumeli, where the Greek city-states gave rise to Western Civilization. Are the Finns white? Their Y-DNA haplogroup is N1a1, which descends from haplogroup N1a, dominant in the Yakut Turks in eastern Siberia.
On a serious note, I do support nationalism but not this bland, deracinated “white” identity that is being espoused by the Alt Right and Darwinists. My ethnicity started as Viking, and then it became Norman, and then it became Quebecois when my ancestor Claude Robillard moved from Normandy to New France in 1671 and married his filles du roi wife Marie in Quebec. My identity is Catholic and Quebecois, and that’s an identity that actually has substance and meaning.
Your identity stems from your father, because fatherhood is a rational construct. It takes the connection of past action to present result and the acceptance of that process as morally good to become a father; namely, the recognition that your sexual intercourse with a woman produced a child of your bloodline, and the acceptance of that child as the legitimate end (or telos) of the sexual act. This is why all creatures on Earth have mothers but only humans have fathers.
The belief that race is morally significant is rooted in Judaism. This is reflected in St. John’s gospel, 8:37-9: “I know that you are the children of Abraham: but you seek to kill me, because my word hath no place in you. I speak that which I have seen with my Father: and you do the things that you have seen with your father. They answered and said to him: Abraham is our father. Jesus saith them: If you be the children of Abraham, do the works of Abraham.” In this sense, Richard Spencer is being morally consistent by identifying with Judaism (in addition to the fact that he is part Jewish himself) because the Jews believe they are chosen by God by virtue of their racial inheritance, rather than by the products of their works.
This is significant because contrary to what you believe (which is rather surprising given that you are presumably a Spaniard) the nations of Europe were not unified or bound in any sense of the word. Western Christendom was torn apart with the Protestant revolts of the 16th and 17th centuries and the rise of Great Britain as the evil empire that ruled the seas. The same Protestant British Empire you presumably identify with as the pre-eminent “White Guys” ruthlessly robbed and destroyed Spanish galleons traversing the Atlantic, flooded China with Indian-made opium to cover the balance of trade for Chinese tea, subjected both the Indians and the Irish to periodic mass starvation by continuing to export produce throughout crop failures and harvest shortages, waged a war of aggression against Boer farmers in South Africa and interned their women and children in the world’s first concentration camps, maintained the embargo on Germany after signing the World War 1 armistice despite explicitly stating they would dismantle it, resulting in the deaths of over 100,000 Germans due to starvation… the list goes on.