Russia First frauds David Duke and Eric Striker assiduously complain about political censorship in America and the West, yet are inscrutably silent about the vast censorship that takes place in Russia under Putin.
The two charlatans gave their usual spiel about Jews and censorship on Duke’s radio show.
Neither Duke nor Striker have ever uttered or written a single word in condemnation of the brutal political censorship in Putin’s Russia, including and especially against white nationalists who criticize Putin’s injurious immigration and foreign policies, and act as if it’s not happening.
They want you to think that this only happens in Western countries as they push forward their Duginist demoralization agenda which falsely presents Russia as the ‘last hope’ of the white race.
What Duke and Striker don’t want white patriots to know is that Russia is actually one of the worst countries in the world on this issue.
People are receiving jail sentences and fines in Russia for posting memes, even for ‘liking’ posts critical of the government.
Anastasia Bubeyeva shows a screenshot on her computer of a picture of a toothpaste tube with the words: “Squeeze Russia out of yourself!” For sharing this picture on a social media site with his 12 friends, her husband was sentenced this month to more than two years in prison.
As the Kremlin claims unequivocal support among Russians for its policies both at home and abroad, a crackdown is underway against ordinary social media users who post things that run against the official narrative. Here the Kremlin’s interests coincide with those of investigators, who are anxious to report high conviction rates for extremism. The Kremlin didn’t immediately comment on the issue.
At least 54 people were sent to prison for hate speech last year, most of them for sharing and posting things online, which is almost five times as many as five years ago, according to the Moscow-based Sova group, which studies human rights, nationalism and xenophobia in Russia. The overall number of convictions for hate speech in Russia increased to 233 last year from 92 in 2010.
A 2002 Russian law defines extremism as activities that aim to undermine the nation’s security or constitutional order, or glorify terrorism or racism, as well as calling for others to do so. The vagueness of the phrasing and the scope of offenses that fall under the extremism clause allow for the prosecution of a wide range of people, from those who set up an extremist cell or display Nazi symbols to anyone who writes something online that could be deemed a danger to the state. In the end, it’s up to the court to decide whether a social media post poses a danger to the nation or not.
In February 2014, when Ukraine was in the middle of a pro-European revolution, President Vladimir Putin signed a bill tightening penalties for non-violent extremist crimes such as hate speech. In July of that year, three months after Russia had annexed the Crimean Peninsula, he signed a bill making calls “to destroy” Russia’s territorial integrity a criminal offense punishable by up to five years in prison. The new amendment makes the denial of Russia’s claims on Crimea an even greater offense if the statement is made in the press or online, even on a private social media account.
Many of the shares that led to the recent rash of convictions were of things critical of Russia’s involvement in Ukraine.
This was true of the articles and images shared by Bubeyeva’s husband, a 40-year-old electrician from Tver, a sleepy provincial capital halfway between Moscow and St. Petersburg.
“Andrei Bubeyev thinks that he was charged as an example so that other ordinary citizens would be discouraged from expressing their opinion,” said his lawyer, Svetlana Sidorkina.
Bubeyev spent a lot of time online, sharing links to various articles on his VKontakte page and engaging in political debates on local news websites, his wife says.
BBC:
The case of a young woman facing jail for sharing memes on social media, has prompted a major debate about abuse of law and censorship in Russia.
Maria Motuznaya, a 23-year-old from the city of Barnaul in Siberia, came to public attention in late July, when she explained on Twitter, why she is on Russia’s official list of extremists and terrorists.
“Hi everyone, my name is Masha, I’m 23 years old and I’m an extremist,” she wrote in Russian, introducing her story.
In the 20 tweets that followed, Maria detailed how, in May the police accused her of “insulting people” by posting satirical memes on her profile page on VKontakte or VK, Russia’s largest social media network.
After an initial hearing, the case is returning to court on 28 August. Maria is facing up to six years in prison on charges of hate speech and offending religious believers’ feelings – both criminal offences in Russia.
“There were several memes – just some religious-themed pictures – that are about the Russian Orthodox Church in particular,” she told me.
One of the offending memes shows women dressed as nuns smoking cigarettes and urging each other to be quick “while God isn’t looking”.
Another one features African children with empty plates in their hands, accompanied by a caption: “Black humour is like food – not everyone gets it”.
“There was no genocide or anything – simply some funny pictures,” Maria explained.
She says that the memes reflect her younger self and that she would not now post them today, as her outlook and sense of humour have changed.
“I was 20 years old, a completely different person,” she said.
When Maria discovered that she was under police investigation, her first reaction was disbelief.
“Honestly, the first time – when I was shown the [search] warrant – I laughed and asked: ‘Are you serious?’. I thought it was a joke of some kind, maybe it’s my friends playing a trick on me.”
She says that when she was taken in for questioning, the police told her she would be given “community service without a criminal record” if she signed a full confession. “I signed everything, having believed our great police,” she told me, with a nervous giggle.
“I can’t believe that what is happening is real. It seems like any minute I will be told that I have been played, that it’s all a joke,” Maria added.
But it is no joke. In fact, since her story made national headlines in Russia, it has emerged that in the same city as Maria, at least two more people are now facing potential prison terms on identical charges.
Details of their cases are so similar to Maria’s that it is hard not to get a sense of déjà vu: both used VKontakte, shared around a dozen memes there, and were later accused of extremism.
One of them, Daniil Markin, 19, has been under investigation for more than a year. One of the images he shared included one that likened the popular Game of Thrones TV character Jon Snow to Jesus.
“[It has been] a year since I started to be afraid to fall asleep, thinking that they are going to come for me in the morning,” he wrote in a lengthy post on VK.
The head of Russia’s only state-run Ukrainian library was convicted on Monday of inciting hatred against Russians in a case that she compared to a Stalin-era political show trial.
Armed, masked police arrested Natalya Sharina in October 2015, confiscating books that the authorities called illegal anti-Russian propaganda.
The raid followed Russia’s annexation of Ukraine’s Crimea region in 2014 and an uprising by pro-Russian separatists in eastern Ukraine, and came at a time when pro-Kremlin politicians were regularly calling Ukraine’s leaders fascists.
Sharina, 59, has been held under house arrest and has always denied wrongdoing. Library staff testified in court that they had seen police officers planting the books, an allegation that investigators rejected.
A Moscow judge on Monday dismissed Sharina’s arguments and found her guilty of inciting ethnic hatred and of a separate charge of misappropriating funds.
She handed Sharina a four-year suspended prison sentence, against which Sharina said she would appeal. Ivan Pavlov, her lawyer, said she would take the case to the European Court of Human Rights if the appeal was unsuccessful.
Sharina, wearing a white blouse, said she was upset and surprised by the verdict, for which she said there was no evidence.
“The state prosecutor admitted herself during the proceedings that this was a political case,” Sharina told reporters after the ruling.
“Not one single book featuring on the current list of extremist literature today was present. People will probably recall this in a couple of decades … in the same way as we remember 1937 (the height of the Stalin-era show trials).”
The British-based human rights group Amnesty International said Sharina’s conviction showed “utter contempt for the rule of law” and reflected “the highly charged anti-Ukrainian atmosphere that is prevalent in Russia at the moment”.
A Russian court on Wednesday sentenced a blogger to five years in jail for what it said was his extremist activity on the Internet after he urged people to attend a protest against high transport fares and criticised Russian intervention in Ukraine.
Vadim Tyumenstev, 35, from the Siberian region of Tomsk, was also banned from using the Internet for three years in a case which Russian human rights activists said violated his rights to a proper defence.
Tyumentsev irked local authorities in Tomsk with a series of blogs in which he accused them of corruption and incompetence. He had also sharply criticised pro-Kremlin separatists in eastern Ukraine, saying he did not see why ordinary Russians should go and fight with them.
A growing number of Russians have been caught up by authorities’ strict — and some say overly broad –interpretation of the country’s extremism laws.
Last year, a 27-year-old man in the city of Cheboksary was found guilty of “mass distribution of extremist materials” when he reposted a news item about his earlier conviction for reposting “extremist” content.
Authorities have also taken a dim view of satirical material and online publications, such as Internet memes, that poke fun at religious figures and beliefs.
In August, a 38-year-old man in the city of Barnaul was charged for a social-media posting that lampooned the head of the Russian Orthodox Church for wearing a pricey wristwatch.
Telegram was banned in Russia:
On Friday 13 April, inside a cramped Moscow courtroom, judge Yulia Smolina made Russian internet history. It took her just 19 minutes to agree to a government request to block the popular messaging app Telegram. The brutal efficiency of the decision – which took hold even before an appeal took place – suggested everyone thought implementation would be easy.
The reality has been anything but.
Communications regulator Roskomnadzor began implementing the ban last Monday, ordering internet providers to block access to the messaging app. A game of hide and seek ensued. As soon as the first subnets were blocked, Telegram switched its servers to alternate IP addresses. Regulators responded by blocking entire internet subsets – to general calamity. By midday on 19 April, it had banned a total of 18 million IP addresses (compare this to 38,000 in all previous years).
Many businesses, including parts of the banking infrastructure, were caught in Roskomnadzor’s net. On Sunday, Gmail and some other Google services went offline for many Russians, as the authorities shut down major networks they believed were being used to circumvent the ban.
The Kremlin basically forced the original creator of VKontakte, the Russian version of Facebook, to sell his shares in the company to Kremlin-linked oligarch Alisher Usmanov who has made the platform a data-mining operation for the FSB.
Vkontakte founder Pavel Durov said he sold his share in the social networking site because of a conflict with the Federal Security Service, or FSB, over data protection and the privacy of its users in Ukraine.
In a message posted Thursday on his Vkontakte account, Durov said that in December the FSB demanded that he hand over the personal details of people who were members of a Vkontakte group dedicated to the Euromaidan protest movement. He also posted a copy of the supposed FSB order.
From November through February, so-called Euromaidan activists played an active role in organizing demonstrations in Kiev against the government of former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych.
However, Durov said he refused to supply the information, and as a result was forced to “sacrifice a lot,” including his share in Vkontakte.
In January, Durov sold his 12 percent share in the company to MegaFon CEO Ivan Tavrin.
“To give the personal details of Ukrainians to the Russian authorities would not only be against the law, but also a betrayal of all those millions of people in Ukraine who trusted us,” Durov said.
“The freedom to disseminate information is the essential right of a postindustrial society. Without this right, the existence of Vkontakte makes no sense,” he added.
Durov also said that he has faced mounting pressure in recent weeks to shut down access to an online group dedicated to the activities of opposition leader and anti-corruption blogger Alexei Navalny.
DW:
A new law that went into effect in Russia on Friday takes “internet censorship in Russia to a new level,” press freedom advocacy group Reporters without Borders (RSF) says.
Under the new law, Russian authorities can theoretically isolate the country from parts of the global internet. The government says the law aims to keep the Russian network functioning smoothly in the event of a crisis or external attack. However, critics warn that the new rules will allow censorship of content that is unwanted by the Kremlin under the pretext of an undefined “security threat.”
Digital freedom activist groups such as RSF say the law will allow authorities to block content without telling the public what has been blocked and why.
“It proves that the Russian leadership is ready to bring the entire network infrastructure under political control in order to cut off the digital information flow whenever needed,” said Christian Mihr, the executive director of RSF Germany.
“Even if the new regulations may not be fully enforceable, they show how extensively internet freedom is threatened in Russia,” Mihr said.
Thousands have demonstrated against the law, which was signed by President Vladimir Putin in May.
Worst of all, Putin’s regime has ruthlessly suppressed the activities of genuine Slavic nationalists, jailing most of them on bogus charges or driving them out of Russia.
In a democracy, it is sometimes said, anything that isn’t prohibited is permitted; in an authoritarian country, anything that isn’t permitted is prohibited; but in a totalitarian country, anything that is permitted is compulsory. By that standard, Vladimir Putin’s Russia is moving rapidly from the second to the third category.
Fresh evidence for that comes from what may strike many as an unusual source: Dmitry Dyomushkin, a Russian nationalist who heads the “Russians” ethno-political movement, who says that now one can love the powers that be only in the manner that the powers themselves want.
The Kremlin is so obsessed with control, he told two Kavkazskaya Politika interviewers, that it is now persecuting with searches and arrests even those who support it but who are not under its total and complete control, actions which in his view undermine the interests of the state and of Russia as a whole.
At the present time, Dyomushkin says, “the Kremlin simply persecutes nationalists, and the force structures threaten them independent of the position of the nationalist on any particular question [such as Ukraine]. You can even glorify Putin, but this is no guarantee that you won’t be arrested or treated illegally. One must love Putin only with permission.”
The Russian nationalist activist was recently subjected to the eighth search of his residence and person by the security agencies, one that involved 12 officers and lasted seven hours. They found nothing because “what could be found after seven earlier searches had taken place?” It was simply a form of harassment, he says.
… What the Kremlin is after is total control. It is not selective as far as which independent Russian nationalists it attacks. Both those who support what Moscow is doing in Ukraine and those who oppose it and both those who have good relations with Ramzan Kadyrov and those who don’t have been subject to official harassment, Dyomushkin says.
Indeed, it appears, he concludes, that what the authorities are most worried about it any indication that “Russian nationalists are seeking to establish relations with diasporas and republics and thus be in a position to act independently.”
On November 4, a few hundred people gathered for the annual ultranationalist “Russian march” in Moscow. With chants like “Glory to Russia” and “Freedom for political prisoners”, the demonstrators tried to march through the Lyublino neighbourhood of Moscow, before the police dispersed the crowd, arresting dozens.
But this year’s march was a far cry from what it used to be in the late 2000s and early 2010s when thousands of people would join well-organised columns replete with banners, flags and drummers.
Today, most of the leaders of the ultranationalist groups that used to organise the march are either in jail or in self-imposed exile. Their supporters consider them to be politically persecuted and complain about increasing state repression.
Although the Kremlin has been accused of supporting conservative and far-right political groups in Europe, at home it seems to be becoming increasingly intolerant towards groups that propagate ideas similar to their Western counterparts.
In the past few years, and especially since the conflict in Ukraine erupted in 2014, the Russian authorities have cracked down on nationalist groups under the guise of criminal investigations or accusations of extremism under the infamous “anti-extremism” Law 282.
… In the years that followed, the ESM was pushed out of the organising committee of the march for being too pro-Kremlin and two other groups took the lead: the Movement Against Illegal Immigration (DPNI) and the Slavic Union (SS). The DPNI was led by Alexander Potkin, who changed his name to Belov (“bely” in Russian means white) and the SS was headed by Dmitry Dyomushkin. Both men are now in jail.
In 2015, Belov was arrested and a year later convicted on charges of money laundering related to a Kazakh bank and spreading extremism among Russian-speaking Kazakh citizens. He was sentenced to seven and a half years in jail.
In 2016, Dyomushkin was arrested for posting a photo of a previous Russian march in which a banner saying “Russian power in Russia” was visible. He was accused of spreading “extremism” and handed two and a half years in prison. A previous court case against him on similar charges dating from 2011 ended in early 2014 without a sentence due to an expiration of the statute of limitations.
Other far-right leaders managed to escape before being arrested. Beletsky says he fled the country fearing arrest as he was questioned multiple times and briefly detained this year after organising nationalists to join Navalny for an anti-government protest in March.
Yury Gorsky, also an organiser of the Russian march and former member of various ultranationalist groups, was charged with spreading extremism and is currently in Lithuania. Igor Artyomov, the former leader of the banned Russian All-National Union, which also used to participate in the march, received political asylum in the US.
Prominent ultranationalist vlogger Vyacheslav Maltsev, who at some point was associated with “Great Russia” and also attended Russian marches, fled from Russia after being briefly detained and is currently in hiding in a European country. Maltsev called for a “revolution” on November 5. Many of his supporters had previously been or were subsequently arrested.
The main complaint of these Russian nationalists who have been railroaded into prison or out of the country is Putin’s lax immigration policies.
The nationalists’ biggest complaint is that millions of people from post-Soviet Central Asian and Caucasus countries migrate to Russia’s traditionally Orthodox Christian and Slavic heartland every year. Official statistics put the number of legal immigrants who are given work permits at around one million annually, but Fund Migration XXI Century, a Moscow-based non-governmental organization supported by the World Bank, estimates that 4-8 million people also enter illegally every year to work.
And it goes on and on.
Duke also pushes the delusional boomer line that Russians hate Stalin and Bolshevism. Actually, recent polls show that Stalin is enormously popular among Russians, especially older ones.
A record seven in 10 Russians now view Joseph Stalin positively, a poll has found.
An annual survey by the independent Levada Centre showed that 52 per cent thought the architect of the Great Purge had played a “more positive” role in the country’s history and 18 per cent an “entirely positive” role.
The 70 per cent approval of Stalin is 21 per cent higher than a decade ago.
It is also better than Vladimir Putin’s approval rating of 62 per cent, as measured by a state pollster this month. His popularity slipped several points after an unpopular pension age hike was announced last year.
Only 19 per cent of those polled thought Stalin, who headed the Soviet Union for more than two decades until his death in 1953, had played a “more negative” or “definitely negative” role.
Respondents were almost evenly split on whether the human casualties under the iron-fisted leader were “justified” by the “grand goals and results” achieved.
While 15 million were killed in prisons and labour camps under Stalin, a state commission estimated after the Soviet collapse, in recent years the “generalissimo” has seen a gradual rehabilitation. In school books and on state television is now often given credit for cracking down on corruption, industrialising the country and defeating the Nazis.
A survey last autumn found that 47 per cent of people aged 18-24 did not know about Stalin’s repressions.
As Russia seeks to reassert itself abroad, Mr Putin has stressed the USSR’s military strength and geopolitical triumphs far more than the atrocities it committed.
“The excessive demonisation of Stalin is one of the ways, one of the routes of attacking the Soviet Union and Russia,” he told Hollywood director Oliver Stone in a 2017 interview, arguing that the UK had built monuments to a “dictator and tyrant” in commemorating Oliver Cromwell.
This is largely due to Putin’s own efforts to rehabilitate the butcher.
Russian president Vladimir Putin has encouraged a revised view of history that presents Stalin as an effective manager and downplays his bloody repressions. Statues of Stalin have reappeared in several Russian cities and officials have begun discouraging talk of his repressions.
With a recent poll by the Levada Centre indicating that 46 per cent of Russians view Stalin in a positive light, praising the Soviet leader has become a vote-winning gambit in the presidential election campaign.
Russian citizens who criticize Stalin’s actions in World War II are getting fined by the state under its new law against the “rehabilitation of Nazism,” which says that questioning the Soviet Union’s role in the war is criminal Nazi apologetics.
The law introduced Article 354.1 to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, making it a criminal offense “to deny facts recognized by the international military tribunal that judged and punished the major war criminals of the European Axis countries [this refers to the Nuremberg trials], to approve of the crimes this tribunal judged, and to spread intentionally false information about the Soviet Union’s activities during World War II” as well as “the spreading of information on military and memorial commemorative dates related to Russia’s defense that is clearly disrespectful of society, and to publicly desecrate symbols of Russia’s military glory”.[2] The penalty incurred for violating this law is a fine of up to 500,000 rubles (about USD$8,200 as of April 19, 2018) or a prison terms of up to five years, with a ban from certain posts and professions for another three years, and/or up to one year of community service.[3]
Unearthing Stalin’s mass graves will land you in jail, also.
Yuri Dmitriev spent years locating and exhuming the mass graves of people executed during Josef Stalin’s Great Terror. Eight decades after one of Russia’s darkest chapters, it is his reputation, not Stalin’s, that is on trial.
The historian, 61, is being tried on charges brought by state prosecutors of involving his 11-year-old adopted daughter in child pornography, illegally possessing “the main elements of” a firearm, and of depravity involving a minor.
If convicted of the charges, which he denies, he faces up to 15 years in jail.
Fellow historians, rights activists and some of Russia’s leading cultural figures say Dmitriev has been framed because his focus on Stalin’s crimes has become politically untenable under President Vladimir Putin.
They say his real crime is dedicating himself to documenting Stalin’s 1937-38 Great Terror, in which nearly 700,000 people were executed, according to conservative official estimates.
His arrest followed close on the heels of the release by Memorial, the organization for which he works, of a list of more than 40,000 Stalin-era secret policemen, a move that raised an outcry among some of their descendants.
With a national election due in March that Putin is expected to contest and win, anything that jars with a Kremlin narrative that Russia must not be ashamed of its past is unwelcome.
Where the hell is Duke and Striker about all of this insanely draconian nonsense? Are they living in an information bubble and are unaware of these things; or are they actively ignoring them in pursuit of a Duginist agenda of demoralization in the West while pumping up the Totalitarian Gulag that is Putin’s Russia as our savior?
The latter is far more likely, folks.
Try sending a link to this very article to them, and judge their response.
I guarantee you they will incredulously dismiss all of the information compiled here as “anti-Russian propaganda” and go on parroting the risible myth that Putin is a closeted white nationalist and anti-Semite who will destroy the Jew World Order in the year 2049.
Yes, indeed we should expose our own Jew-controlled elites who are suppressing our speech. But giving a pass to some neo-Bolshevik tyrant because he’s helping some camel jockeys kill other camel jockeys in a desert melee is the dumbest stance any genuine white nationalist could take.
Thing is that the FSB (Putin’s successor to the KGB as secret police) regularly engages in murder-on-demand against people critical of the current system in Russia, even when these people no longer live in Russia. They go after them to UK or Germany or wherever they live and kill them. Muh freedom of speech.
I don’t understand why this hateful and totally undeserved attack on David Duke and Eric Striker. What is wrong with you, Brandon?
I don’t know about Striker, but David Duke has been and is a brave and outspoken enemy of the Jews. He has done it openly risking his life and career. He has produced two good books, many excellent videos.
The fact that they do not speak up about Putin’s growing and brutal censorship is a flaw but not a crime or treason. Let’s focus on what they do regarding Jewish power. What we do not need is people like you attacking comrades and sowing division like the bastards from Renegade Tribune do.
I would like to see all those enemies and critics of David Duke come out in public and act openly as he does risking their livelihoods. He has been fighting for the White race for decades, what have you done?
I respect Dr. Duke and what he has done but when somebody is doing something wrong you call him out, it doesn’t matter who he is.
this “Don’t punch right” thing has destroyed the WN/Alt-right movement.
https://youtu.be/o1Me3YBxlTk
Hello Phil:
I agree with you. If a comrade does something silly or wrong, that may harm the movement, he/she must be told-off. Apparently David Duke and Eric Striker’s “crime” was not denouncing Putin’s persecution of nationalists. Maybe they do not know about this.
In any case, the right thing to do was to write an article proving that such persecution exists. It is NOT correct to insult David or Eric calling them “charlatans” and “Russia First frauds”.
I hate Putin and Dugin who are conscious and devoted servants of the Jews. Unfortunately, many people who claim to be White Nationalists and who should know better do not believe this. As far as I know, neither Duke or Striker praised or endorsed their views, but IF they did they should be told-off and corrected. These men have proven to be loyal fighters on behalf of the White race, but like everyone, they have flaws and sometimes make mistakes. Let’s not burn them at the stake for a misdemeanour.
They are not simply mistaken. They know this is happening and have chosen to hide it from their audiences because they’re Duginists pushing a Russia First agenda.
Striker has made it clear that he sides with non-whites above whites, and Antifa (the ones in Novorossiya) above white nationalists, when those interests help Russia.
Striker is a subversive Nazbol trying to derail white nationalists into Third Worldist ape causes.
Hello Angelicus:
Brandon has written a lot of articles about the Putin/Dugin question that have been sent to Spencer and Striker and yet these people did not reply. Brandon challenged Striker to debate the Russia issue and Striker declined. What else can you do if they ignore you?
David Duke has been in the movement for decades and am sure he does know about Dugin’s sleazy plans. Either he ignores it or he is playing us, he’s got the article “Is Russia the kew to white survival?” on his site. When the demographics and policies of Russia indicate the opposite.
As Brutus says in the video I posted this “do not question/critize our leaders” have been nefastous for the Movement or what is left of it.
Hello Phil.
You are right, I did check on this guy Eric Striker and I did not like what I have found. The man is poison. I am very shocked and disappointed by David Duke, a person like him should know better. Very sad.
This pro-Poo-tin mentality is obviously wrong. Sadly even WN/extreme-right people in Europe are pro-Jewtin. Some years ago I was following this European political alliance called Alliance for Peace and Freedom. It’s a WN/far-right alliance made of several parties in Europe. Here are some interesting things about this alliance.
The 2 leaders of this alliance, Nick Griffin and Roberto Fiore, even had a conference in 2015 in Moscow about WN-ism and in that conference Griffin said that the time had come for Russia to influence Europe, because from the great powers of Europe, it’s only Russia who never influenced Europe. Obviously he was referring to Jewtin’s Russia. At the same conference, Fiore called for Russia to be the 3rd Rome (i.e. 3rd Roman empire) at that same conference.
The Romanian member of this alliance, namely Noua Dreapta, back in the summer of 2008, when the 5-day war in Georgia happened, protested in front of the Russian embassy in Romania against Russia’s military invasion of Georgia. 6 years later, in 2014, when Russia annexed Crimea, the Noua Dreapta people said they fully supported Russia’s action with regards to Crimea because Crimea is Russian territory and not Ukrainian.
The Slovak member of the alliance, namely Kotleba’s party’s turn now. Kotleba’s party’s leader, Marian Kotleba, became local governor of his region (Banska Bystrica) in late 2013 and was in that position all the way until late 2017. Also Banska Bystrica is the place in Slovakia where the 1944 Slovak National Uprising took part, this uprising being against the Slovak state, who at the time was a client state of Hitler’s Germany. Nowadays, they even have a museum there, commemorating the uprising, even if it was defeated by the Slovak state. In 2014, Kotleba refused to attend that year’s commemoration of the event (70 years commemoration mind you) and at the time, he was highly critical of the 1944 Uprising. 2 years later, in 2016, when a left-wing Russian, pro-Jewtin biker gang toured some countries of Europe, including Slovakia, celebrating the defeat of the muh Nazis, guess who sent people to join the celebration. Oh yeah, Kotleba’s party.
There are probably other such examples within the Alliance for Peace and Freedom, but moving on. The Nordic Resistance Movement (or Nordfront) were in contact in around 2015-2016 with a nationalist movement in Russia and even interviewed their leader. When asked by the NRM, how is the situation in Russia, the Russian guy said that, just like in the West, Jews control the country, and that they control Poo-tin. From then on, that guy never featured on Nordfront. Maybe they cut ties when the Russian guy called Jewtin out?
Coming back to the Alliance for Peace and Freedom now. Some of the people in that political alliance are definitely plants in the WN movement. Nick Griffin’s dad was a freemason and so was his grandfather and likely, he is a freemason too. Nick Griffin is definitely a ZOG plant in the WN movement. Noua Dreapta in Romania was created in 2000 by 3 people, among these 3 people being a certain Swen Philippe Moritz, who goes by the identity of Ion Glebescu or something like that in Romania, but he is in fact a German Jew. This Moritz/Glebescu guy also had troubles with the law in Romania after he tried to illegally appropriate some property in his name.
The Russian motorcycle gang I was referring to is called Night Wolves and they are, according to Wikipedia, outspoken supporters of Stalin. Also, the Night Wolves are financed by the Kremlin.