So unhinged feminist women are not only trying to imitate men’s superior physical and intellectual prowess, but our deeper voices, too.
BBC:
Cecilia Pemberton at the University of South Australia studied the voices of two groups of Australian women aged 18–25 years. The researchers compared archival recordings of women talking in 1945 with more recent recordings taken in the early 1990s. The team found that the “fundamental frequency” had dropped by 23 Hz over five decades – from an average of 229 Hz (roughly an A# below middle C) to 206 Hz (roughly a G#). That’s a significant, audible difference.
The researchers had carefully selected their samples to control for any potential demographic factors: the women were all university students and none of them smoked. The team also considered the fact that members of the more recent group from the 1990s were using the contraceptive pill, which could have led to hormonal changes that could have altered the vocal chords. Yet the drop in pitch remained even when the team excluded those women from their sample.
Instead, the researchers speculated that the transformation reflects the rise of women to more prominent roles in society, leading them to adopt a deeper tone to project authority and dominance in the workplace.
Former UK prime minister Margaret Thatcher employed a professional speech coach to help her to sound more authoritative, deliberately dropping the pitch of her voice by a massive 60 Hz. And while most of us may not go to such great lengths, recent research shows that we all spontaneously adapt the pitch of our voices to signal our perceived social rank.
For both men and women, the people who had lowered their pitch ended up with a higher social rank
In one experiment, Joey Cheng of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign asked groups of four to seven participants to perform an unusual decision-making task that involved ranking the items that an astronaut would need to survive a disaster on the moon. And at the end, she also asked each member to (privately) describe the pecking order of the group and to rank each member’s dominance.
Recording the participants’ discussions throughout the task, she found that most people quickly shifted the pitch of their voice within the first few minutes of the conversation, changes that predicted their later ranking within the group.
For both men and women, the people who had lowered their pitch ended up with a higher social rank, and were considered to be more dominant in the group, while the people who had raised their pitch were considered to be more submissive and had a lower social rank. “You were able to predict what happened to the group, in terms of the hierarchies, just from these initial moments,” Cheng says.
Yeah, women are trying to sound more manly so that they’re taken seriously by men.
Women are trying to be men, plain and simple, and this will result in a further divide of the sexes as men will refuse to mate with these brutish females with deep voices.
This is precisely why homosexuality is on the rise, too.
Bull dyke career women can’t find men willing to date them, so they’re hooking up with women out of necessity.
This is the kind of thing that the Frankfurt School Jews celebrate. They not only radically altered our culture with their poisonous ideas, but have altered the very genetics of our people as they evolve to accommodate these new mismatched “gender roles”.
Men will begin producing more estrogen and women more testosterone.
Once men and women have evolved into some kind of androgynous alien mutant race, the Frankfurt Frankenstein project will be complete.
