Richard Spencer’s Left-Wing Girlfriend Described Him as “Decidedly Liberal” on Social Issues in 2018 Article

I remember reading this at the time, but I forgot about it. It seems pertinent to bring it out now in light of the cringe “racist liberal” smear being wielded by the Spencer faction against anyone in the Dissident Right who doesn’t submit to satanic Duginism and doesn’t prioritize Palestinian-Islamic causes.

In a 2018 article, Spencer’s current left-wing girlfriend Megan Bobonick described him as “decidedly liberal” on everything besides the race issue.

I understand that through this process I was often faced with the decision to cease seeing Richard in an effort to regain what I once had in my usual life: job security, certainty of my safety, and better search results online. I have faced countless questions from people across the political spectrum who do not understand my relationship or my happiness with it, but to this day I am convinced that my relationship is an example of an ideal America — a crossroads of conflict and ideas that are overcome through friendship, care, and conversations aimed at understanding, not proving a point. I am living my own example, and everyone’s disgust reaffirms the need for friendships and relationships like my own.

As everyone has quickly noted, I self-describe as a liberal, though unlike some of the polarizing writers and personalities of today, I entertain different stances on varying issues, often making me difficult to place or put in a box. For many of Richard’s supporters, my agnosticism and egalitarianism are appalling positions. For those in my home camp, my relationship is evidence of either an absence of convictions or the enabling of white supremacy. To all sides, I would like to point out that aside from Richard’s stances on racial identity and immigration, the majority of his positions on social politics are decidedly liberal. We do not spend our days locked in combat or debate over his more controversial ideologies. And we clearly prefer it this way.

Many in the movement already understood this to be the case as Spencer’s tolerance for sodomites (as one example of his liberalism) was well known. He had been inviting open homosexuals, like Jack Donovan, to speak at his NPI events.

Spencer is a social liberal and economic egalitarian with racial views.

So how does this clown and his sycophants get off with this hyper cringe “racist liberal” epithet? Verifiably, it is Spencer and his followers who are, by all accounts, the “racist liberals” who’re tolerant of sodomites and demand that white nationalists cuck for Arab dindu causes abroad.

This must be part of their Duginist chaos magic of projecting onto their rivals what they’re guilty of themselves.

It really is only this Spencer faction of the former Alt-Right who can be categorized as “racist liberals”. Lately, this faction has been coming out with sundry “hot takes” effectively defending left-wing insurgent causes like #metoo, Bernie Sanders style free gibs socialism (which will mostly benefit minorities and attract foreign migrants), environmentalism, and support for Islamic towel heads in places like Iran, Syria and Palestine.

They’re egalitarians with a racial bent. I wouldn’t be surprised to see within the next year that they drop race entirely from their analysis and embrace open communism and Kalergist integrationism in order to ‘save the world from climate change, defeat COVID-19 and free Palestine’.

Whatever they’re doing, it’s totally fake and gay and born of infantile minds.

*Hat tip to Thuletide for unearthing the Bobonick quote