Brendon O’Connell Wakes Up From the Putin Stupor

It took Brendon O’Connell awhile, but about six months ago he finally woke up out of his Russophilic stupor (which I’ve been warning about since 2014), and is now a strong critic of the Putin cult in the alt-media. He also seems to be calling out the Assad worship cult as well, which is prominent in the left-wing anti-Zionist part of the heavily compromised and Russian-controlled alt-media.

O’Connell used to be a major Iran groupie too, even seeking asylum in the country before realizing that their anti-Zionist facade was a fraud. But unfortunately, despite coming to terms with this ludicrous hero worship of certain corrupt Middle Eastern and Russian politicians, O’Connell hasn’t graduated from leftist anti-Zionism. His discourse still orbits around what is best for Muslims, Arabs and the Middle East, and focuses heavily on the sinister shenanigans of Israel in that region.

It’s good that he exposes Israel and Jewish corruption, but he does so from the basis of placing Arab well-being above European well-being. He still never touches on the Kalergi plan and white genocide. Israel has without a doubt been up to no good in the Middle East for a long time, but that’s not much of a concern for us from a European nationalist perspective. Especially when considering that Arabs and Muslims are up to no good in our societies – routinely committing terrorism, rape, and myriad criminal activities as well as spreading their ugly mosques and culture everywhere – it makes little sense why we’d shill for them in their countries. Jews, Arabs and Muslims are all problematic in many ways, so siding with one against the other in their little Semitic land squabble is the wrong approach.

O’Connell now likes to talk about how Israel is in bed with Russia and China, but he never addresses how organized Jewry is also working with Muslim elites in the West to foist multiculturalism and white genocide over our heads. A Muslim-Jewish Semitic alliance against the white man has been brewing for some time. That is entirely absent from his discourse which revolves around Israel’s Operation Talpiot technology schemes and Middle Eastern wars.

Like many people, including myself, O’Connell fell into the pro-Muslim thinking on the basis that Muslims seemed to be the only people speaking out against the Jews, while our own Western leaders are mostly slavish cucks for the Jews. Iran’s 2006 Holocaust conference won over a lot of anti-Zionist Westerners to Iran cucking and hero worship. But considering that Iran supports and promotes Muslim immigration into Europe and indeed feeds us with countless Iranian immigrants, it quickly becomes apparent that Iran is, like Russia, attempting to seduce Westerners into their orbit on issues of common interest like opposition to Israel, while surreptitiously working against us in other areas, like immigration.

Like Russia, Iran woos attention-hungry Westerners by inviting them to conferences, giving them praise and a voice on their media channels. But in return the Iranians, much like the Russians, expect extreme pro-Iran cucking on geopolitics. Even the Holocaust thing was done from a very narrow pro-Arab/Muslim perspective. Ahmadinejad, who seems to be the only Iranian politician interested in the Holohoax, repeatedly said that the Holocaust, whether it happened as claimed or not, should not be used to oppress Palestinians. He had not much to say about German and European suffering from this Jewish mythology – he only cared about the affect it has had on his fellow Muslims in Palestine.

Iran is a double-dealing power willing to work with the very people they condemn, Americans and even Israelis, when it suits their interests to do so. For instance, Iran directly aided the US war in Afghanistan to topple the rival Taliban regime. During the 1980s Iran-Iraq war, Israel facilitated weapons shipments to Iran. And now, relying heavily on Russian military aid and intervention to keep themselves afloat, they’ve reduced themselves to a measly satellite of Moscow.

Who the hell cares about Iran. They’re no friends of European nationalism and they selfishly use fame-hungry (usually leftist) Western pundits to shill for their interests while giving very little in return besides five minute interviews on their crappy TV channel.

And ultimately, anti-Zionism is a dead end. Opposing Jewish supremacy in the West is definitely what we aim for, but removing the Jewish state won’t help us much in that regard. The goal of Iran and other Muslims is to completely drive out or subordinate Jews in Palestine and make it a Muslim state. The Jews who refuse to convert to Islam or submit to Muslim rule would most certainly come crawling back to Europe. The ones driven out would surely come our way too. That’s millions more Jews in our lands causing problems, backing leftism, immigration, homosexualism, feminism, pornography, hate speech laws and spearheading white genocide.

It’s not in our interests to remove Jews from Israel and have them filter back into our countries. The best thing for us is to have all Jews go live in Israel. Since Israel already exists, the best we can hope to achieve is sending our Jews over there so they stop bothering and undermining us in our lands. Yeah, the Palestinians have gotten a raw deal, but we can’t save them from the Jews any more than they can save us from the Jews. And Palestinians don’t want to save us from the Jews since many of them invade our lands as immigrant pawns for the Jewish Kalergi plan. So why should we care about their issues in Palestine?

As nationalists we support breaking off relations with Israel and ending their spying and bribery in our nations. But it’s better for Israel to exist so that we can ship our unwanted Jews to a land already set-up for them to live. Afterwards, we couldn’t care less what happens to Jews or Arabs in the Middle East. They can have each other, because we sure as hell don’t want them.

73 thoughts on “Brendon O’Connell Wakes Up From the Putin Stupor

  1. Brilliant article – last paragraphs are gems. Looking in perspective, all that Ahmedinejad bravado was nothing but a theatrical, propagandistic stunt to win sympathy from the ideologically-abandoned Western lumpen (since healthy nationalism is forbidden), just like Dugin’s shtick. In the end, you end up with a bunch of leftist kaffir-cuckolds and Matt Helmbach’s Russophile skinheads, among others – all to be eventually interviewed on RT talking trash about the mystical “Deep State”.
    Just got into it with brazilian Duginists trying to prop up some fool from São Paulo that went to Ukraine fight for Russia, got captured, released, then went back as “private security” only to be captured again. They’re trying to portray him as some “hero” against “liberalism” – the kid is unstable, made posts on social media claiming he liked Hitler and Stalin, etc. “All that matters is action, praxis”, they say, not what he is. “The struggle in Ukraine is a facet of the Universal Cause of Humanity against the atlanticists”. These people are as psychopathic as evangelical Zionists, it’s like a cult.
    #DownWithDugin

  2. I haven’t followed O’ Connell from the beginnings (discovered him in mid-2017), but his critique of Russia always seemed to me half-baked, kind of rushed. As if he was jumping a new trend in alt-media (kind of like Varg Vikernes for Thulean Perspective – he was Russia cuck, but as of late he’s become critical towards it). His incoherent blabbering doesn’t help either. Anyway, he’s saying some good things here and there, but i can’t get out of my mind the fact that he’s of the leftist-marxist ”school” and endorses anti-white/white guilt talking points. I don’t know if he has updated or changed his stance on this.

    1. O’ConHell’s ego and irrational, illogical rambling is very tiresome. He’s put a name to the zionist’s blanket theft of US technology which he calls ‘Talpiot’. But thats just 4th gen spying. Rosenbergs stole the bomb tech long before Talpiot. Israel seized America even before WW1 vis Fed Reserve. Look at history and see the pattern repeating in every country they’ve occupied/infiltrated. For this bit of info, he’s correct.
      but O’ConHell is a Truther who knifes other Truthers in the back- latest being his long time defender Kevin Barrett, whom he threatened to report to the CIA/US Embassy on his vid! Not kidding. That folks, is a red line. O’ConMan should be kicked to the curb and not given face time. We dont need this kind of crap among Truthers who are already under fire enough from MSM and the govt – much less to have to cope with such betrayal among each other.

  3. Since Israel has threatened Europe with nuclear weapons and has worked hard to undermine Europeans, it would be best if the Jews were pushed out of Palestine and Europe for that matter. Where they end up is of no concern to us, as long as it is far away from Europe and the Middle East. We cannot forget that the Israeli state is one which looks at native Europeans with disdain. The white man will always be a threat to them, so it’s best they move far and away from these societies.

      1. Regardless of how I feel about Islam does not mean it isn’t expansionist, dude. What is so hard to understand about that?

        1. As much as Muslims promote the Jewish controlled media on anything anti-white, I say fuckitt. Send Jews into all Muslim countries. The smart Muslims will separate from the religion, as so many are doing, and the others will suck them in as they need to do. Then, to even the score, we’ll blame all the world’s problems on both of these Jews and Muslims. We’ll even protest to the death for gibs me dats for centuries from these particular Muslims and Jews.

          1. that isn’t the point. The point is Europeans don’t need to give Jew’s their safe space after all the damage they’ve done. Especially since that space has threatened Europe more than once. Send them to Antarctica

            1. Do I sound like I fukin like Islam to you? Do I sound as though I like racist, low-IQ, high-crime, punk ass Muslims to you?

            2. My original comment had nothing to do with Muslims. But with that said, I would say send Muslims back to their own countries in the Mideast and North Africa and these Turkic Jews back to Antartica, or Central Asia where they came from.

            3. The hell you mean it had nothing to do with Muslims? You said:

              “Where they end up is of no concern to us, as long as it is far away from Europe and the Middle East.”

              What percentage of the Middle East is Muslim, Jerry?

            4. The main thesis of my argument is to keep Jews away from Europeans and other Human beings as much as possible. As the state of Israel is no good to us and a threat to us. Oh and it’s only a few hours away on a plane depending on where you live. As far as the Middle East, i don’t care what percentage of it are Muslims. If they attack Europe, which they are unlikely to do, then they will probably lose, and their lands will get colonized again. See the site is about reconquering Europe not the Middle East. What they do in their countries is of no concern to Europeans, and if it is, well they don’t seem to have their priorities straight now do they

            5. I SAW you say keep Jews away from whites, but what about keeping MUSLIMS and ARABS away from whites???

            6. Jerry, don’t play victim and act like you’re just “innocent” and that all you have here are “opinions”. You are fucking annoying, disrespectful, antagonizing, and you can’t stop running your ignorant mouth. If I tried to talk nicely and calmly to the innumerable number of slow fucking trolls like you in this world, I’d have nooo time left. So it’s best to get you and your yapping ass out of my way as quick as possible. Over and over again I’ve said these societies are going to collapse and this is gonna get ugly. Don’t be thinking people like me are going to be giving people like you free fucking passes or that we’re just gonna hug and kiss and make up. People like you need to be held accountable for your actions and we either be separated or bad things are gonna happen; although they might be seen as good things. I’m not gonna be missing people like you; that’s for goddamned sure. And fuck Islamophiles, BTW.

            1. What’s wrong with you? I just said they go back to the Middle East and North Africa or wherever their homeland is. Take it easy man, get off the internet.

            2. Hey DOUCHE Jerry, you say “What’s wrong with you? I just said they go back to the Middle East and North Africa or wherever their homeland is.”

              WHERE did you SAY, “I just said they go back to the Middle East and North Africa or wherever their homeland is.”

              And DOUCHE BAG, the fucking Middle East is approximately NINETY PERCENT Muslim. Don’t play like you don’t fucking know what the vast majority of the people in the Middle East are. AND, YES, DOUCHE, Arab motherfucking Muslims talks shit about whites ALL THE TIME. What’s wrong with YOU???? Maybe YOU need to get off the internet, DOUCHE. There are basketball games to comment on, you know.

            3. Keep Jews out of the Middle East, but then say Muslims are unlikely to attack Europe… DOUCHE, Muslims already ARE attacking EUROPE.

              And do you mean send MUSLIMS and ARABS back to the Middle East or North Africa? WHERE the fuck did you say that above, you FUCKTARD?

            4. Send Jerry’s stupid ass to the Middle East and/or put a bullet in his head is what I’m talking about, lol. The stupid motherfucker kind of reminds me of “Joe Cardsbury”, lol; even kinda reminds me of Joe Sigur or Lasse Anckarman. Fucking scum bag piece of low down dirty vaginal EXCREMENT.

            5. Dana the reason why Muslims are attacking Europe has to do with Jewish agendas, and yes the Middle East is 90% Muslim which is why Muslim immigrants should go back to the Middle East among other places.

              What’s this talk about putting a bullet my head. You are triggered very easily. Like a feminist cunt. I doubt you are capable of very much beyond the keyboard. Go get some help you crazy ass clown lol.

            6. “What’s wrong with you?”
              There is nothing wrong with Dana Jerry.
              Please see that Dana has been dealing with ‘multiculti bob’ and others in previous posts.
              He is simply a little agitated by some of the comments and sometimes displays his anger.
              Controlled anger is such a wonderful attribute.
              Great style . . . and entertaining.
              It is better to be like that, clearly annoyed than to be a ‘politically correct’ ‘wet lettuce leaf’.
              I wish I could be more rude and aggressive, but it is not in my nature.
              Everyone has their own threshold of trigger.

            7. See Dorset, that’s bullshit. It doesn’t matter if he is agitated or not. Saying someone needs a bullet for their opinions which I would argue is not far off from true alt right thinking, is a sign that this person needs some help. In a civilized world that’s how it works anyways. I try not to get into too many online debates as there are way too many keyboard Kung fu fighters out there. They will threaten you with murder, talk the talk, and when that day comes that you see them in person. They run from you as though their asses are on fire. Way too many people like that. That annoys me.

            8. Yes threatening with a bullet is obviously going a bit too far in this case.
              I think Dana used that language just to make a point and ‘get through’ so as to speak.
              If you had read back through the posts of this website you would then have known what to expect.
              I agree with you that ideally debate should be conducted in a calm and respectful manner.
              However it is not an ideal world.
              Dana’s style is effective in getting his point across.

            9. I also find it funny, Jerry, that lots of clowns on the internet such as yourself automatically jump to the conclusion that anybody who makes a threat online has to be some kind of “keyboard warrior” and/or “pussy” off the net. Well, you are a fucking FOOL, if you didn’t already catch what I was saying before, and you suuure know how to pick ’em, lmfao.

              I already told Joe punk ass “Cardsbury” that if he wants to do a power lifting competition in the gym to LET ME KNOW. It’s kind of hard to lose in drug-free power lifting competitions when your natural test levels in the gym are almost 2,100 nanograms per deciliter and you can train every body part and gain everyday, nonstop. It’s more like dummies such as yourself run your mouths online and then complain that people get annoyed with you. Fuck outta here.

    1. Are you thinking the Middle East is predominantly Christian or some other religion or white or some shit??

      1. I’ve already noticed punk ass Joe Sigur self-identifying as a “racialist”. Plenty of others will also act as though they’re “racialists” to infiltrate any perceived “anti-Islam” movement. Fuck them, and fuck you if this is you. You are all douche-bags who could use some serious arsenic and other things, if you know what I’m saying.

        1. 2 things. Unrelated with each other. No end point. Just information.

          1) There is a strong case to be made that the “Nuclear threat to the world” of Israel (that this Jerry mentioned) is bullshit, and that the person who “gave the evidence to the world” that “Israel has nuclear weapons”, that Vanunu guy, was a double-faker, if you understand what I mean (giving “classified” bullshit to the world). Nuclear bombs probably didn’t exist AT ALL around 1998 (youtube Pakistani nuclear tests, and tell me that what you see is a nuke, and tell me that if they exist elsewhere, then ONLY pakis faked it, and also tell me that they got away with it with every nuke-power watching it lol) and I won’t give anyone the benefit of the doubt that they exist now. Hiroshima and Nagasaki are thriving cities, the japanese had to be told they were a-bombed and not firebombed Tokyo style. So that nuke-the-world israeli “option” is probably bullshit. To make the goyim think that they should never (ever ever ever echo) let the chosen state fall.

          2) There are people who think that the chosen people are parasites created by human evolution (living in cities for more generations than probably everybody else on the planet, and even if you believe the Khazar theory (I have no opinion), they had a lot of time to get selective breeding for literate bullshiters). Some extremists might claim that they shouldn’t and won’t fit anywhere in the world. But I personally think this is overanalyzing and fetishizing of extreme action. And if we are to completely remove parasites, then it is such a big endeavor that we will end up with half the white population we have now (think of politicians, lawyers, bullshiters/salesmen etc). Not to mention women which would also destabilize and ultimate kill the society because of radical changing of the male to female ratio.

          1. 2+ good points Fox.
            Not a lot of people have researched those points.
            The ones that have researched, have widely differing opinions.
            I am with you on those points.

            1. Well we know what they, the government and other entities, want to do now.
              And they are doing it.
              Multiculturalism is their current experiment.
              Since WW2 (and before on other things) the British population has been misled.
              We were lied to, or not consulted, or consulted under false pretences.
              We were not asked whether we wanted to take part in this white genocide experiment called multiculturalism.
              Obviously we now need to take action before it is too late.
              I hope that our people are now awake to the agenda and to who the perpetrators are, and they realize that firm action now needs to be taken.
              At some stage soon, our people will have to stop being fearful of repercussions and do what needs to be done to regain the country from these traitors.

          2. I still haven’t much researched the no nuke theory, Fox, but will probably get around to it eventually; probably much later than sooner, lol. A few reasons why I have so little motivation to research it, though:

            1. Even if nukes don’t or do exist, they’re absolutely unnecessary for being able to conquer countries and/or make societies collapse. Like, no nukes were needed to orchestrate the Bolshevik revolution and mass deaths in gulags and innumerable other wars; or no nukes are needed to bring about mass immigration, radical feminism, welfare, gun control in high-IQ societies (gun control could easily actually make the homicides decrease in every black neighborhood/city in America, but that’s another story) and every other kind of cancerous malady to society.

            Another example like this is I’ve known people who were quite red-pilled, but they literally believed in David Icke’s theory about “shapeshifting reptilians”, and they truly believe these reptilians are living below ground and are going to orchestrate some kind of “ground invasion” against humans. What I’ve always said to these folks is, guess what: nooo reptilians are needed to make these societies continue to get worse and worse and/or collapse and/or to cause massive numbers of deaths. Not that I believe in shape-shifting reptilians anyway, lol.

            The last thing is, even if Israel were to fire off real nukes at Europe, how do they know certain military personnel wouldn’t fire back? Israel is a tiny country and one mistake could get Israel easily wiped out if nukes are real. I don’t know how many Europeans are actually afraid of Israel nuking them, but I haven’t heard hardly any express much fear over it. Of course, if Israel is going to threaten Europe with it, though, they sure as fuck shouldn’t be given a free pass and they need to be threatened with not only the exact same thing, but worse themselves for starting shit. No one has to live with being bullied or threatened, and a big part of the reason people bully is because they either know or think they can get away with it. If they got busted in the head with a baseball bat every time they did it, though, you bet your ass they’ll think a little harder about doing it to the same person/people in the future. They have to be mercilessly attacked and stomped, and, if they’re not stomped hard enough, they’ll be back at it again.

            1. I agree Dana with your point “people think twice if they think there will be repercussions” (my paraphrase).
              That may also be the reason why in countries with guns, people are extremely polite if they accidently bump into you “Oh I’m sorry, I’m sorry” . . . more polite and friendly than in countries without guns.
              Just a thought.

            2. @ Dorset. Ppl are very impolite in Greece, i think the specific type of people would be more polite if guns were completely free. Good point there.

              @ Dana Everything you said is correct, your reasoning is sound. But if the variable of nukes existing gets out of the picture, it is not just that its abscense is there, but the void gets filled with all the who and what and why, and oh what the fuck when you realise that somebody pulled such an incredible thing on your grandparents, parents, and you. Lot’s of connections with our favorite chosens etc. However I will stress it that THESE ARE MY PERSONAL OPINIONS. No need to drag this gem of a site to “conspiracy theorizing” because it is what the powers that be want, to mix it all into a nutcase David Icke case, and say boom the alt-right is delusional. However I as Fox will speak exactly what is in my mind because I don’t give a fuck.

  4. Brendon could really do himself a favor by actually looking into all these anti-white Jews and the anti-white, pro-non-white agendas.

    Of course he could do himself many other favors, like looking at race differences in IQ. When I first took the red-pill on this stuff 4 years ago, I think the first vid I ever saw on race and intelligence was created by Libertarian Realist. He made a three hour vid on it that I can’t find anymore, but found it to be quite fascinating. He has made others on it as well, of course, and he has included some of the best info on it out there. I didn’t just watch a few of his videos, but a whole bunch on his YouTube channel because he had his own kind of niche/research going, traveling around the world with red-pilled race lenses and actually studying it everywhere he went and reporting on it. Then Ryan Faulk came out with some additions on race and IQ in that different races also score better in certain areas of IQ tests than others. So it’s like whites score noticeably higher than NE Asians on certain parts of IQ tests, and then there are parts of the test where NE score like 14 points higher than whites. I believe that if the verbal portion of IQ tests was taken out, IQ wouldn’t be only 75% heritable by adulthood, but probably like 80-85% because practically anyone can improve their verbal intelligence; it’s very easy, it just takes time. Not that I’m saying it shouldn’t be a part of the test, though, because personality traits are probably also a significant indicator in how well someone scores verbally, and personality traits are about 50% heritable, too.

    I remember thinking many years back, growing up, like everybody else that there were no differences in racial IQ at all, and later on that IQ wasn’t really a good indicator of intelligence at all. I had read what I presume to be culturally Marxist books about it claiming that there are many different kinds of intelligence, including creative and emotional intelligences, and given the latter two can’t be measured that IQ was a poor and irrelevant measure of intelligence. Of course when I actually started researching it, I realized this is obviously largely untrue. For example, though, I remember when I first learned the game of chess and would play with other young kids my age. I didn’t have good coaching, but I noticed rapid improvements in the game right away that my other friends weren’t making. That is obviously highly heritable, just like many other talents are highly heritable. I discarded things like this under the Marxist paradigm, just like I had all kinds of reasons to believe women certainly were not the angels we’ve all been taught that they are, but I just had no way of verifying and compiling all these different thoughts and it really hampered me in red-pill growth.

    While I obviously don’t agree with LR and Ryan Faulk on issues of ‘evolution’ (I tried to debate Ryan on evolution because he’s a die-hard believer in it, and/but I sent him a few links and added information on it and he didn’t want to debate anymore), he definitely helped pave the way for the ever-growing race-realist group out there. Some good, random vids of his I’ve seen, and unfortunately I can’t find that 3 hour and 20 minute vid of his anymore and YT might have banned it. Of course his and many others’ are just the beginning on the solid evidence out there on race differences in IQ. Anyway:

  5. ^It’s funny how people who are good in debate on certain issues and are aware of the red-pill process they took to get there, including the specific questions they had to ask themselves and others, so, so often aren’t aware that they employ the same tactics denialists use who try to debate them on the topics they know they can’t lose debating on, or are red-pilled on. Like if I debated LR on evolution, I would most certainly win and he’d have to resort to the same tactics denialists would use, lol, but they don’t realize this stuff, lol. If a person can’t win in a debate, they obviously need to re-examine their thinking and their paradigms; this you’d think would be elementary dear Watson, lol.

    But another good random vid of his I saw like 4 years ago, though, and he’s got a bunch of good pro-white vids on his channel:

    1. That exhibition is typical of the brainwashing and deception surrounding the anti-white agenda.
      Exhibitions like that should be banned as they are spreading false information.
      The people behind them should be re-educated and punished.
      To those sorts of people, lying and disinformation comes as second nature.
      They must know that they are lying through their teeth to advance their aims.
      They have been authorized to do it, so punish the culprits in authority too.

      1. Indeed. And I’d add that the punishments should be extremely severe. It’s funny, dudes like me typically get along well with a lot of people, like at the poker tables, but I have an extreme antipathy towards douche bags that I’ve noticed the vast majority of people don’t seem to have. I believe in extremely harsh punishments for people with ulterior motives and the likes because much of why they do what they do is because society is too easy on them.

        Yeah, that vid is good on everything other than “evolution”. And the dude at 15:55 says, “… obviously the Christian-right denies evolution because it threatens the creationist account…”. Ummm, it’s more like the Christian-right denies evolution because the theory is so full of holes it’s incredible. For instance, where are allll these transitional fossils (AKA “missing links) these evolutionists claim exist? And he says the left denies evolution… lol, maybe he didn’t get the fukin memo, but cultural Marxists are huge believers in evolution. And it’s really wild that people like Libertarian Realist could be such a fan of somebody like Darwin who coincidentally happened to have a significant influence on Marx. Leftists certainly do believe race differences exist, just that they only do so under certain circumstances and not others; for instance, all races are equal, except whites: whites are “inferior”. Leftists just have a very odd way of going about how they believe in evolution in order to fit their whacked-out narrative; so they might deny it in certain cases, but then totally affirm it in others. He also doesn’t seem to realize that many creationists such as myself are not disputing that, for example, certain animals are selectively bred for certain purposes, or that a tribe of people can, for example and over time, grow bigger or smaller ears, grow bigger or smaller lungs, grow taller or shorter, and even grow bigger or smaller brains. The *actual dispute* is that it’s genetically impossible for one species to transition into another.

        This site here is one of many that has a lot of good information exposing Darwin, and obviously much more can be found exposing him. A couple quick excerpts out of it:

        “3. FOSSIL RECORD
        Charles Darwin stated, in his Origin of Species, “The geological record is extremely imperfect and this fact will to a large extent explain why we do not find intermediate varieties, connecting together all the extinct and existing forms of life by the finest graduated steps. He who rejects these views on the nature of the geological record, will rightly reject my whole theory.””

        “This deposit is dated as 60-million years older than the Upper Jurassic rock in which Archeopteryx was found. He first found the rear-leg femur and, later, the remainder of the skeleton.

        This was reported in Science News 24 September 1977. Professor John Ostrom commented, “It is obvious we must now look for the ancestors of flying birds in a period of time much older than that in which Archeopteryx lived.”

        And so it goes with the fossil that many textbooks set forth as the best example of a transitional form. No true intermediate fossils have been found.

        In a letter to Luther Sunderland, dated April 10, 1979, Dr. Colin Patterson, of the British Museum of Natural History, wrote:

        “…I fully agree with your comments on the lack of direct illustration of evolutionary transitions in my book. If I knew of any, fossil or living, I would certainly have included them. You suggest that an artist should be used to visualise such transformations, but where would he get the information from? I could not, honestly, provide it, and if I were to leave it to artistic licence, would that not mislead the reader?””

        https://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evolution%20Hoax/evidences.htm

        1. Yes Dana . . . very interesting.

          Food for thought:

          Dinosaur – “a bunch of shattered bones held together by a couple of tons of plaster sitting in a museum display.”
          http://loveforlife.com.au/content/10/09/14/dinosaur-deception-dinosaurs-never-existed-dinosaur-fossils-are-hoax-dinosaurs-scie
          “The possibility exists that the concept of prehistoric living dinosaurs has been a fabrication of nineteenth and twentieth century people possibly pursuing an evolutionary and anti-Bible and anti-Christian agenda.”

          Not saying either way, but I have been aware of the dinosaur hoax idea for more than a year.
          It somehow sounds plausible and hoaxes have been proven to be hoaxes, especially in cases where there are underlying agendas.

    2. Dana said
      “If a person can’t win in a debate, they obviously need to re-examine their thinking and their paradigms”.

      Hopefully they will do that (re-examine their thinking and their paradigms).
      Sadly many will just stay in their comfort zones and won’t admit to being wrong.

      1. Others simply want to be “in with the in-crowd” or do not want to upset people they are friends with or are associated with.
        I am also talking of the “social climber” types, whose main objectives are self progression and impressing “important” (important to them) people.
        So they will go with the flow and stand up for values that – they know deep down – are bad and even constructed on deceptions.

  6. Dummy Jerry, the reason Muslims are attacking Europe is far from only being due to “Jewish agendas”; your statement is very philo-Muslim. Muslims have been invading and attacking white lands, as well as many other lands since the very beginning of Islam. Doesn’t matter if the Muslims are Arabs or Berbers or Turks or belonging to any other racial group/s.

    My problem with you, fool, is you don’t know WTF you’re talking about and you’re yapping away, wasting my fucking time. It also takes you a long time to respond like these other clowns such as Lasse Anckarman, Joe Sigur, “Joe Cardsbury”, Bob, and everybody else who has to premeditate and rig answers, and dodge simple questions because they want to hold on to faulty, ignorant paradigms at all costs and then be condescending to you while they’re at it.

    A lot of fools such as yourself also equate being “triggered” with feminists and others who get unjustifiably angry at simple truths. Well, if I see, for example, a thief right in front of me, obviously I’m going to be ANGRY, but it’s a different KIND of anger than you’re trying to pigeonhole me as having.

    You and I aren’t the “same” and aren’t gonna be. You are a fucking fool, and the bullet in your head statement is the kind of thing that this is all gonna wind up coming down to anyway as it’s all completely and totally unavoidable. May not necessarily be bullets in heads, and/but death by other means. And I seriously, seriously don’t like loud-mouthed fucking buffoons and am a proud EUGENICIST. Don’t ever say “we”; ya mean you and/or others, dude. You’ll be saying you doubt I can do anything… after all this is da internet isn’t it, douche.

  7. O’Connell is convinced that Hitler was funded by the Rothchilds, or whatever.

    This fake war in the Middle-East is same old, same old, just as fake as the Cold War. The war theater didn’t start with Putin. It’s been going on since the establishment of the UN by the end of WW2. Russia has always backed America up with the most influential hoaxes, whether it was the Holohoax, NASA, 9/11 or even WMDs in Iraq.

    Before this war theater could commence, the enemy, Adolf Hitler, had to be removed. And so I won’t waste my time with cucks who believe that Hitler was a part of the establishment.

  8. Is that like Saddam Hussein and Gadaffi had to be removed because they were “good guys”? Is that like Assad has to be removed cuz he’s a “good guy” too, n sheeeit? Another “professional mind-reader” you are, correct?

    1. Not sure if you’re replying to me or not. You can call them “good guys” if you want. They were probably just nationalists for their own nation’s interest, much like Hitler.

      One thing’s for certain: they certainly weren’t cooperative with the establishment, so they had to go.

      And no, I don’t need to be a mind-reader to arrive to my conclusions, just not a lazy, historical researcher.

      1. Yes, my comment was directed at you. I’m experiencing a bad internet connection ATM.

        So you do believe that Saddam, Gaddafi, and even Assad are good guys, now. Is that also like the removal of de Kirchner in Argentina because she was a “good woman”, or the talk of the removal of Kim Jung-Un cuz he’s another ‘good guy’ or the removal of removal of Steve Bannon because he was/is another “good guy”?

        What is your opinion of Hitler escaping to Argentina with other Nazis? Hitler woulda never done anything like that and only would have committed suicide like a champ, right?

        Why is it, since I’m a lazy historical researcher, that I’ve learned virtually nothing off of Hitler in terms of feminism, multiculturalism, gender and race differences, welfare, classical Marxism, the homosexual agendas, gun control, central banking, Judaism, secret societies, or controlled opposition, as some examples, off of Hitler? I really should just drop what I’m doing right now, drop everything I’ve learned, and should just tune right on in to Hitler and everything he did and said because clearly he was a very moral, mentally superior individual, correct?

        1. This idea that Hitler was all part of the show is just ludicrous at the face of it; and therefore, the idea that he would go to Argentina to die as a sick man is also ludicrous. Let’s not think about the 60 million commoners who lost their lives in WW2; let’s instead think about the elitists with power, and what they lost.

          By the end of the war, the French, Dutch and British Empires were in ruin. Immediately after the war, the French lost Vietnam, the Dutch lost the East Indies and the British lost India. Subsequently years later, the French and British were simply too weak to maintain what was left of their empires.

          If this were all just some big theater, with Hitler as an actor, then none of these accrued losses would make any sense. The whole point of controlled opposition is that the leader is actually controlled! If he really were part of the show, then such a huge loss wouldn’t even be necessary.

          And yes, I do believe he was a morally superior individual. He enacted animal welfare and anti-smoking laws, and cleaned Germany up of its Weimar filth.

          1. Wait, though; real quick: did other Nazis escape to Argentina to live as sick men? And if they didn’t go to Argentina to live as sick men, how do you know Hitler did?

            1. And why did you also ignore all those others that I mentioned who were removed from power? Just “nationalists” that “had to be removed from power”, were they?

              And anybody who could’ve stopped the British and Dutch Empires had to be “good”, right?

              If you missed any others that I mentioned, you’d also agree that Trotsky and Kirchner were also removed because the establishment wanted them removed, just like Saddam and Gaddafi, right? All “nationalists”, right?

            2. These pro-Hitlerians suuuure know all kinds of things that those skeptical of Hitler’s ‘good intentions’ don’t, lol.

            3. Matthew, speaking of cucks, why are pro-Hitlerians, like Scott Roberts, such white knights? You wouldn’t be a white knight either, by chance, wouldja?

          2. Oh dear god, not hitler again.

            Hitler was an agent of the chosen people (or a very sick useful idiot of the chosens). 1) Dunkirk evacuation, 2) Generals near Moscow 1941, no order for final attack 3) Battle of Kursk pre-announced and staged as such that the Russians would build up defenses.

            Main purpose of WWII: Creation of Israel and lots of goyim dead. Objectives accomplished.

            Main purpose of Neo-Hitlerism: Identification of nationalism with the Holocaust.
            Objective ongoing.

            Fuck you matthew.

            1. You go fuck yourself with your conspiratard BS, cuck. Just from your nickname we know you’re the kind of delusional twit that entertains one conspiracy theory on top of another and therefore, should be ignored.

              What a disappointment this site is, to have a fanbase of idiots who equate losing a war to controlled opposition. Not one of these cucks bothered to read Mein Kampf, nor even a pamphlet of National Socialist propaganda, nor have a clue what exactly happened in Nationalist Socialist Germany during the 1930s, that’s for sure.

              Ban me as you must. No loss whatsoever.

            2. Let’s ridicule Matthew for the fun of it! Get your asshole lubricated man.

              1) “You go fuck yourself with your conspiratard BS, cuck.” —–What do you think of the Holocaust and 9/11 and Israel’s dirty work behind the scenes etc cuddly boy? Hmm someone else is a “conspiratard” here too I assume. Conspiracy: “A conspiracy is a secret agreement by people to commit something wrong or illegal. Depending on the circumstances, a conspiracy may be a crime, or a civil wrong.” Did the knife in your asshole hurt? First ridiculing of Matthew is over (sounds like a biblical thing).

              2) “Just from your nickname we know you’re the kind of delusional twit that entertains one conspiracy theory on top of another and therefore, should be ignored.” —-And just from your nickname I know you are a moron named Matthew (or is it?)

              3) “What a disappointment this site is, to have a fanbase of idiots who equate losing a war to controlled opposition. ” —-Speaking to other humans here and not the subhuman low-iq moron called Matthew. These are my personal opinions. I haven’t even seen a single person on this site agree with me. So your ass got invaded again dummy.

              4) “Not one of these cucks bothered to read Mein Kampf, nor even a pamphlet of National Socialist propaganda, nor have a clue what exactly happened in Nationalist Socialist Germany during the 1930s, that’s for sure. ” —-I have read Mein Kampf. You haven’t addressed (or presumably you deny) my 3 points why WW2 was a sharade. Top executives of the NSDAP were agents or useful idiots. I am sure that Hitler’s mule (Hess) was a useful idiot, dummy like Matthew. ADDRESS MY 3 POINTS “Matthew”.

              5) “Ban me as you must. No loss whatsoever.” —–I think you should be banned from life, because we have many low-iq useless subhumans like you who can’t reason at all. However I think you shouldn’t and won’t be banned from this site. We need morons like you to get a good day’s laugh! Cheers dummy!

              ADDRESS MY 3 POINTS OR PUT MORE LUBRICANT!

            3. Lol, Fox.

              You know, I’ve noticed so many of these pro-Trumpians, pro-Putinists, and pro-Hitlerians threaten not to be your “friend” if you don’t like their idols. Lmfao. Ohhhh muh god, puhlease be muh friend n sheeeit!! Fuuuuck outta here, clowns. I don’t like ANY of the above three and never will, you fucktards.

              Notice how Matthew’s dumb ass didn’t even bother responding to my questions. I’ve always wondered, for example, WHY so many Hitlerians are such goddamned WHITE KNIGHTS. Why are punk asses like Scott Roberts such fucking PUSSIES when it comes to exposing female crime? I take it Hitler didn’t do too good a fucking job EDUCATING his people on feminism. AND, how many anti-white BUFFOONS are pro-Hitler? Just a couple off the top of my head are Ken O’Keefe, Trevor Labonte, and Joe Sigur. Fucking fools.

              I was thinking though that I need to start putting these poker playing skills to good use and make an OPEN CHALLENGE to ALL Trumpians, Putinists, and Hitlerians. It’d be fun just to be PRINTING MONEY like it’s going out of style PLAYING with these fools. I foresee myself doing such a thing on YouTube in the not too distant future, just for the FUN of it, and just to CLOWN these “mind-readers”, lmfao.

            4. @ Dana

              The reason they are manginas is because they worship Hitler and equate him with some kind of mystical, good-ol’ways of tradition, everything was good BACK THEN (when exactly?) and Hitler’s war was the last stand against (insert something here) which reigned supreme after He lost. This mythical, mystical, surreal good-ol’times of course involves female angels doing their part in the close-knit society blah blah blah gently putting the arrows in the whatever it is called on the MEN’s back to go to fight (not actually wondering why the bitch will not be called to fight?? ahahhahaha lol). It is gynocentrism masquarading as tradition or something. Plus it is/was a necessary thing for the new goyim to be born because the goyim is the TREE, and parasites need the tree to keep going at least decently so they can continue to suck the juices. Parasites cannot create something and surge forward.

              What you call poker and I call mental judo is fun indeed. I personally prefer comments sections, because the morons cannot take back what they said (or invent some lie, lying that they said something when they didnt). It is also like putting your brain to work to find bullshit. It is unsurpisingly easy to find inconsistencies in the “reasoning” of subhumans like “Matthew” because they are full of shit, however, others are more experienced bullshiters. Training your brain to detect bullshit is a very nice brain exercise, the brain also is like any organ, so you get better at detecing bullshit if you train enough. I will say something very far-reaching and maybe it will sound a bit extreme but I think that detecting bullshit is priority #1 for any healthy ideological movement (to clean up immitators, fakers, bullshiters). Assfucking the “matthews” is just the expression of this healthy bullshit detection endeavor.

            5. Fox
              Thanks for the synopsis regarding Hitler / WW2.
              Main purposes and objectives, as you see it.
              Simple concepts and “in a nutshell” statements are great as a basis for further research.
              Hopefully whoever picks them up, will research fully, then eventually return full circle with exactly the same synopsis.
              Cuts through all the unnecessary details and sparks interest.
              After that it is up to the individual researcher to go as deep into the subject as they wish to or are able to.

            6. Gibraltar in WW2 is also a weird story. It could have been my point #4 There is a theory I’ve seen somewhere that, theoretically, Hitler could have gotten Gibraltar and thus he could have made the Mediterranean a “german lake” with the support of Italy of course. The nationalists had won in Spain but I have no idea about the relations of Franco and Hitler after the Fall of France (I don’t know if Franco would allow Hitler military access or whatever). So unlike some morons I keep my mouth shut because I am not sure about that. But Gibraltar in WW2 is a subject which is fishy you know… Hell, it should be priority #1 after the fall of france.

              I also think that “Sitzkrieg” business (the period of minimal hostilities after the fall of Poland and before the invasion of France) was kind of like both sides (france, germany) going WTF now?? As if waiting for orders lol… But again I haven’t researched much.

              The ONLY people who ever tried to kill hitler were nazis (not something you would expect). This should ring some bells too.

            7. Agreed Fox that detecting and weeding-out bullshit is very important for ideological movements (especially those getting off the ground), if not the most important endeavor the people in the movement can do. It’s very often painstaking and time-consuming, but if the morons and infiltrators aren’t dealt with, they’ll contribute in slowing you down or worse.

              Haha, mental judo is another good way to describe it.

              I’d seriously love to put out a video challenging all Trumpians, Putinists, and Hitlerians to a poker game; it could be full-ring or heads up. First of all, I’m just really competitive by nature, but secondly, I feel as though all the trash-talking idolizers of the three owe me. They owe me money and many other things for all the hassles they’ve caused me, and they owe other people too, of course. Nothing like laying the smack down on arrogant ignorance. I’ll seriously think about a video like it, although I do like to retain a low profile because I’m a little more introverted than extroverted and I also don’t like getting into endless arguments and fights when I’m trying to focus on poker. Being pissed off does not help a person in poker and I try to avoid it. But I’d definitely love to put the challenge down for these “expert mind-reading” clowns and just may. I actually have a few challenges, but will get to those a bit later on. Either way, I’ll be around, I just don’t know when I’ll be, exactly.

              That said, this is like the third time I’m saying this lol, but I’ve gotta get off here and get back to focusing on poker with full force and prefer to only focus on a few things at a time than lot’s of different things. Man, I’ve always got the idea in the back of my mind that as soon as I take a long leave of absence from sites like this that mofos will come in talking shit when I’m not around to defend myself, lol.

              You know what one of the cool things about poker is when you get to upper stakes and you put your time in there, you inevitable make all kinds of connections with people who’ve acquired a lot of money from other avenues and quite a few of them are entrepreneurial/investment minded and are willing to invest in good ideas you might come up with. It’s my intention in the future to contribute to this movement in the future, although I’m still formulating ideas and new relationships and things. But I’ll be around in the future here and there.

              You, Dorset, and Brandon: you’re doing great jobs and keep kickin’ ass; I’ll likely catch you around again sometime in the future. I’ll definitely be back to this site just to catch up on certain things I’ve missed, although I don’t imagine commenting much for quite some time. Take care for now. 🙂

            8. @ Dana

              Take care man. And you should know your comments are apperciated. Our conversation about God and benevolence (if you remember) for example has CLEARLY left me more enlightened (especially your idea that some people or even animals (that one with beautiful bird and another one that came and attacked it ahhaha) could possibly deserve what they get or at the very least not deserve better), so consider coming back to the site in the future even if not full force. 😉

            9. Dana said
              “Take care for now. 🙂”
              Thanks and you too Dana . . . take care.
              Have fun and most importantly have much good fortune.

          3. Idolizing Hitler too much is a dead end. He can’t come back to save us, so worshipping a corpse is a fool’s errand. I think when the topic comes up we should rebuff the false Jewish narrative on Hitler and the Holocaust, but we can do that without overly glorifying him as a saint. Hitler did many good things to fix Germany, and the Nazis were certainly on point about the Judeo-Masonic conspiracy. But he also made numerous idiotic tactical blunders that cost his country everything. In the end he became a megalomaniac and drove his nation into self-consuming wars over some minor land squabble with Poland. Really dumb. I have no strong opinions on the theories of Hitler’s survival after the war.

      2. Saddam and Gaddafi were both very cooperative with the “establishment” for a certain time. Gaddafi was even good friends with Tony Blair and we all saw the video of Rumsfeld shaking hands with Hussein. Seems to me that the hardcore Zionist Likudnik faction wanted them out for the simple reason that they variously supported the Palestinians in some ways.

        1. And Nixon, Trotsky, and Sergei Kirov are a few more examples of people removed from power by what some would call the “establishment”. Musta meant they were “good guys” too, according to Matthew’s logic.

          I’ve seen pro-Hitlerians call people who don’t idolize Hitler or aren’t pro-Hitler “lazy historical researchers” before. Well, one of us must be lazy historical researchers. I always wonder to myself how I could have learned so little off of Hitler and pro-Hitlerians, yet these folks idolize him so much.

          Matthew, and would you say Hitler committing suicide (every pro-Hitlerian I’ve talked to believes the official story that Hitler “committed suicide”) was for the good of his country and/or humanity, or more along the lines of being self-serving, out of curiosity?

          1. That’s a catch-22 for them, lol. No body was ever found because he was secretly extracted by his masters after serving them well. It’s no secret that he was a member of a couple esoteric sects.
            No bodies of the Russian royals were found after the revolution there as well, and Napoleon was “locked away safely” twice. They treat their boys well.

            1. Yeah, really odd extra/added circumstances involved in the equation many people don’t take into account.

          2. There could be any number of reasons behind the scenes that can’t be accessed by the general public as to why the aforementioned were removed from power. When I look at them and so many others who seemed to certainly be parts of the establishment like Harvey Weinstein or some of the Jewish oligarchs Putin has gotten rid of as other obvious examples, I really don’t have a fukin clue why they were removed. Hitlerians sure seem to know though, especially when it comes to Hitler, lol. Hitler was a good guy and therefore was removed by the establishment, they proclaim, ad nauseum. Sure is a very simplistic and cock-sure fukin way of looking at things given the situation/s, lol.

  9. Even the most anti muslim jew is a muslim lovning jew.. deep inside they want this caliphate both zionist jews and muslims

  10. I responded to a jew “It’s not in our interests to remove Jews from Israel and have them filter back into our countries. The best thing for us is to have all Jews go live in Israel. Since Israel already exists, the best we can hope to achieve is sending our Jews over there so they stop bothering and undermining us in our lands. Yeah, the Palestinians have gotten a raw deal, but we can’t save them from the Jews any more than they can save us from the Jews. And Palestinians don’t want to save us from the Jews since many of them invade our lands as immigrant pawns for the Jewish Kalergi plan. So why should we care about their issues in Palestine?

    As nationalists we support breaking off relations with Israel and ending their spying and bribery in our nations. But it’s better for Israel to exist so that we can ship our unwanted Jews to a land already set-up for them to live. Afterwards, we couldn’t care less what happens to Jews or Arabs in the Middle East. They can have each other, because we sure as hell don’t want them.”

    And got this feedback
    ->
    https://imgur.com/a/ZZhgTxi

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MEMBER LOG-IN

Subscribe

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

CLICK HERE TO BECOME A MEMBER

Archives

Alex Jones Alt-Right Australia Blacks BLM Brandon Martinez Canada China Communism Coronavirus Dugin Europe Fags feminism Germany Globalism Immigration Islam Israel Jews Jordan Peterson Kalergi Kalergi plan Leftism Migrants Muslims nationalism Palestine Politics Power Putin Race Richard Spencer Russia Spain Trump UK Ukraine US USA White genocide White Nationalism Whites Women Zionism

Categories

PRIVACY POLICY
TERMS OF USE POLICY

Martinez Perspective