Livestream With Dante About Alt-Right

25 thoughts on “Livestream With Dante About Alt-Right”

1. The Moors weren’t black, though; but I’ve noticed many among the pro-black persuasion think they were and apparently “are”, lol. The Moors were Berbers who are still in North Africa, and some are fighting the Arabization of their lands and for their cultures which have been suppressed by Arabs. There were black slaves brought North of the Sahara, but Berbers weren’t and aren’t black as a people. And Timbuktu wasn’t built by blacks either, unless it was slave labor and they were directed by the Moors, as it only became a permanent settlement in the 10th century.

   When one talks about ‘advanced’ in terms of civilization, one always has to take into account that obviously the word ‘advanced’ is a relative and subjective word. Black Africans “advanced”? There may have been certain tribes that were more advanced than others, but “advanced” as a people? I mean they hadn’t even invented the wheel. Certainly not guns, great ways to cultivate agriculture en masse, machines of flight, etc. Blacks always have been very non-advanced and primitive as a group. There were certain Amerindian tribes that were more advanced than others as well, but this doesn’t mean that they were “advanced” as a people… they didn’t have guns, great ways to cultivate agriculture en masse, etc., either, and were hunter-gatherers just like the sub-Saharans, just a little more advanced.

   The smartest 20% of blacks could build good things, and/but it’s not just a matter of having extremely low-IQs with blacks, it’s also part of the personality to be impulsive (not plan), and to be extremely content with abject poverty and mediocrity… they just don’t give a shit. The smart blacks have to segregate themselves from the rest of the blacks in order to be successful.

   And there is no problem accepting or having truly pro-white blacks in a pro-white ethno-state. There aren’t many blacks who are really pro-white, but some exist. IMO, they should be able to form their own black group/s or can be in the pro-white ethnostate (there is not a single 100% pure ethnostate in the world that I can think of). The few pro-white blacks out there are cool AF. The rest of the blacks, now, need to be segregated from all other whites, except the die-hard white libtards, to say the very least.

   Reply

   1. Oh, and as for Jonathon Perkins and economic hitmen.,, there certainly are economic hitmen, but many folks act as though they don’t reside in the West, lol. Yeees, the West has had central banks of usury for centuries. I know Ken O’Keefe is another one of these dummies, lol, who thinks these central banks actually “fund” or “give money” to whites in the West (not just no interest, but “give” them the shit, lol). Nooo man, it has been extremely costly for whites to have so many trillions of their money taken and given to blacks, as well as many other groups. Just the “war on poverty” has costed 22 trillion. It’s not like this money is being taken from blacks and given to whites, lol, but the exact opposite.

      Reply

      1. Are you Brandon’s handler because if you are, it’s good that you live on this site. Take your eyes off for a second, he’ll be a full fledge SJW or maybe even a Jew with a new name, with old material scrubbed!

         Reply

         1. No, I was referencing some of Dante’s comments, and Charlemagne’s comment which was something about how blacks were as advanced as whites at one time. I mean IQ is approximately .75 heritable by adulthood, and the big-5 personality traits have a heritability of about .5 (and you can reasonably conclude that all other personality traits are about the same in heriability). This definitely includes things like being impulse-driven, carpe diem traits when it comes to planning (or I should say *lack* of planning), lack of empathy, and indolence: all of which are the highest among blacks. It’s a real stretch of the imagination to say or think blacks were just as advanced as whites. Not just in the poor societies they built and severe lack of innovation, but they’re also a very high-crime group with lots of robberies, attacks, rapes, and murders. And for anyone who has studied black crime in depth, it’s not the kind of stuff that gets reported in the MSM, but they do the most egregiously stupid shit imaginable. I mean there are dumb ass people in all races, but blacks have them all topped by a long-shot. Retardation among blacks is higher than it is for any other race. You see what blacks do to public housing in America, but Aborigines do the same shit to public housing in Australia. Large numbers of them belong in the wild because they feel most comfortable there.

            Tommy Sotomayor for example has compiled all kinds of mind-bogglingly stupid shit that blacks do (especially black women – so much for them being the “most educated” race of women in America, lol) that you can easily find looking at his channels. Like Tommy says, ‘If there’s more niggaz than three, you won’t see me’ lol, or ‘Play stupid games, win stupid prizes’. I too have compiled all kinds of dumb shit blacks have done. You won’t see it on the MSM or on Cops, but they sure are tha kangz and quanez of the dumbest shit imaginable. Looking at black crime for any decent period of time will let you know right away that their level of stupidity just can’t be taught, but is inherent among them. If blacks were ever as advanced as whites, it’d be way, way back in time, but I seriously doubt they ever were. We know people don’t survive in harshly-cold environments without doing things like storing food for the winter. You’d have to do some kind of mass-culling/eugenics program of blacks to get them on par with many other groups, including and especially whites, (assuming something like that could even work to begin with),

            Both Brandon and I are aware that the KGB has long had interest in destabilizing and demoralizing the West, but we definitely disagree on some of the ways they’re going about it. The US MSM has been monopolized and corrupted for many decades and I’m not about to start defending it, including Faux News. I’m not about to start defending Trump either, lol. Of course RT is also a joke in so many ways, just like pretty much all the rest of the medias around the world, (including pretty much every other regime, presidency, oligarchy, monarchy, etc., around the world) and I’m not about to start defending those either.

            Reply

2. Interesting to listen to.
   He has a lot of in depth knowledge (obviously studied different things in detail) and a following of people and other high profile contacts, who will all now see that the alt-right is not all that bad as depicted everywhere.
   Brandon calmly got all the facts clearly stated as usual.
   You 85% agreed. We got to hear charlemagne (and his audio feedback echo).
   Norace was uncomfortable with the segregation idea, but maybe it could work in certain states provided other states were allowed to go the multicultural liberal route, say california for instance.
   We would soon see a difference between different states.
   There is already an exodus from california to places like texas, where taxes are lower.

   Reply

   1. Dante was more along the lines of agreeing to disagree. At least he’s respectful in disagreement though, and probably will pick up more things as time goes on. And at least he’s not a die-hard pro-black as the vast majority of black Americans are, and I’m sure he has been around many whites and probably has had a lot of white friends.

      He’s like a Gilad Atzmon out there who shuns all forms of identity politics which means we disagree on all kinds of things. That line of thinking totally defies reality because there are numerous, obvious, blatant differences between the races and genders, both physically and mentally, which can’t be equalized via environment. He also believes that blacks in black countries are purposely being held down and that these central banks of usury don’t operate in the West and target whites for usury (when they certainly do), but are only targeted at third world countries who he believes are being intentionally kept down. He also believes that there is no clear agenda to demonize and disenfranchise whites while simultaneously lionizing and empowering blacks. We could go on for days exposing them.

      In these conversations, it’s difficult to be respectful without being perceived as being over-bearing as well. So Brandon said ‘I think’ on a couple different occasions. It makes sense to say these things in respectful dialogues, but at the same time, some people perceive statements like that as if the person isn’t really sure what they’re talking about. I do the same thing when I’m trying to be respectful, but it kills me, lol. It’s like you’re beating around the bush so that you don’t hurt people’s feelings or say too many things outside of their reality. Unfortunately I’m not consistent with it either and really don’t know the best way to handle such issues… is it just being respectfully blunt which can be perceived as disrespectful at times, or is it to not be too over-bearing but then possibly be perceived as being somebody who doesn’t really know what they’re talking about. I definitely am not consistent in the way I go about it and sometimes feel like being blunt and at other times want to be more respectful. When I do too much of one or the other, I often over-correct. This is why I prefer to do debates Boycott American Women style and just fight the shit out so that I’m not worried about hurting people’s feelings and so that I can put the fire to any person I’m talking to. Like Brandon on Trump, if I didn’t like Brandon, I’d tell him that he’s assuming Trump has morals and integrity when Brandon says Trump is “trying” to stop immigration in the West. I mean, to me that is ridiculous because it’s taking the mind-reading position that this clown actually has morals and integrity when he has shady connections up the ying-yang and will say anything and constantly shifts his directions and stances on issues and policies, like any sneaky politician does.

      Dorset, the more I’ve listened to Rae West, the more far out I think the dude is. It’s like in 2014, he sounded like he was at least more open to the ideas that evolution is a joke and that Jews were anti-Christianity. These days he takes the position that evolution is “fact” and that Christianity might have been written by Jews and that Jesus didn’t exist. In a mafia, if there is no uniting or cohesive factor/force around a bunch of other power-hungry sociopaths, they can’t stop from killing each other and can’t unite. Clearly they do take orders from somewhere else. I really don’t think the dude is too fukin bright, to be honest. And he believes the JFK assassination must have been faked as well. Well, when JFK first got in, he was on board with the globalist policies. As time went on, he was noticing the evil behind them. He wound up speaking out about things like secret societies, the Dimona plant, etc., and also eradicated Federal Reserve notes for a short amount of time and created US notes which were silver-backed; these US notes can still be found to this day, although they’re obviously very rare. When you defy Lucifer in high politics, you will be punished for it. Rae says way too much shit that he can’t back up on too many things in an argument and it’s hard for me to take the dude seriously.

      Reply

      1. Dana, I think that the scope and depth of your arguments and the way that you can spot nuances that don’t ring true, means that you would probably be great yourself, as a high profile individual in the alt-right, or one of the truth type movements.
         I know you already “did all that” in the mens/mgtow arena.
         You could maybe do a website that would outshine rae west’s biglies.org and tidies up on things where you disagree with him.
         Rae has sort of frozen his forums and so that does suggest he has an unwillingness to debate at this current point in time.
         I know you love arguing your points, so maybe a website with comments, like Brandon’s alt-right.
         I also know that you put a lot of work and research into your online presence.
         Just a few thoughts to ponder.

         Reply

         1. Rae does change his views as and when he uncovers more information and if he gets convinced by people with new theories that are better than the ones he currently has. I remember he changed his views on several topics.
            We must all strive to be open minded and not deliberately ignore information that conflicts with our long held beliefs.
            Without enough research (and even with it) we are all prone to mistakes, misunderstandings and deceptions.
            But definitely, the people who do not do any ‘cross-referenced’ research themselves and just believe what they are told by the highest profile mainstream or alternative news source are just ‘asking to be’ misled.

            Reply

            1. Rae can seem to be a bit kerfuffled sometimes and I think this would probably be due to his wide and deeply researched mental store of information, that often flags up conflicts or doubts about what he is saying, in his brain, as he proceeds to make his points.
               Reading his website is valuable in that it circumvents the occasional obvious minor failings with his verbal delivery.
               Saying that, it can also be said that listening to and watching someone, can make or break whether we take them seriously or not.

               Reply

               1. When we give people the ‘benefit of the doubt’ for whatever reason, it is then that we enter into very dangerous and uncharted waters.
                  We become strongly biased towards them and make efforts to rationalise and sideline our initial doubts.
                  In other words they can do no wrong . . . which is a bad way to think.
                  Some give people the benefit of the doubt to individuals, but they never fully trust them.
                  The good thing about being cruel and blunt is that it clarifies your position in no uncertain terms.

                  Reply

                  1. typo
                     Some people give
                     not
                     Some give people

                     Reply

                     1. I think I should stop using the word ‘people’, it makes things simpler.

                        Reply

            2. The herd often follows the most convincing and charismatic leader.
               A leader’s ability to convince and his obvious charisma . . . does not always equate with honesty, intelligence and good morals.
               It is sometimes a worthwhile exercise to antagonise someone to see how they react, it often gives clues as to how mentally stable they are.
               Don’t try this at home kids.

               Reply

         2. One of things I have going for me in any type of red-pill movement where debate/argument is necessary is because I’m interested in so many different things. I’ve researched so many different things incessantly since I first started taking online red-pills and continue to do so; although the pills I’m currently researching don’t have anything to do with any activist-type of movement, but just other red-pilled areas I find fascinating and intriguing that haven’t been figured out yet and won’t be entirely. But even before I started on the internet, I was still very interested in certain red-pilled areas and had been developing my own red-pilled reservoirs of epiphanies/knowledge. For example, health and fitness was one, and I knew it’s a red-pilled area where there’s a lot of hidden knowledge and magazinez can’t tell you the best ways to train because every body is different, so I was doing it myself.

            I’ve never wanted to become well-known in any movement because I know how much time and consistency it requires to have regular shows and to have to keep up with current events. Some people don’t mind so much, but I prefer to be able to take long periods of time off doing other things when I feel like it or need to. I even know of poker players who’ve built up large followings for their videos, channels, pods, and sites they consistently create content for, and even though they’ve been very successful, they often have to deal with feelings of burn-out. People come to expect you to keep making content too, when you don’t feel like it, and I really don’t like the feeling. Even Ownage Pranks has these crybabies whom I only presume are entitled millennials and they throw hissy-fits like little fucking children when he’s late producing vids, or they’re “too short”, etc. That kind of thing pisses of off a lot more than it does the average person.

            Certain shit Rae says he can’t debate and I presume it’s not because he’s trying to take time off, but because he just doesn’t know what he’s talking about and has to ignore so much contrarian information to these things he’s claiming.

            I could see myself starting a site eventually down the road and probably will at some time, just not anytime in the near future because I’m so focused on so many other things right now. Yeah, when you create a site, you have to be willing to debate and counter-argue/attack others’ mal-researched and critically thought-out, dumb ass, lying thoughts and claims for other people who may not know any better and/or don’t know how to counter them. I’d definitely be willing to do such a thing because it’s not only what I’ve always done, but you have to. Like I say though, I won’t be doing it anytime soon because I’m getting back into the poker-groove and am gonna be playing a whole bunch for the next few years or so.

            Another red-pilled area I’m into is learning more and more about is finance because it’s a very necessary and important area to have mastered in anyone’s life, (especially if you want to eventually do something like help create your own media empire). Openly pro-free market capitalists like this, for example, are great on the topic and alt-righters would be wise to pay attention to people like this because finance will continually be very important in the future:

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJlWQ08UCyM

            Thanks though Dorset. And no doubt, every damned claim that is made has to be fact-checked and researched for potential counters. Of course the more accurate realizations a person has made, the easier it is and the less time this person has to spend doing so, but it’s still very important with any kind of new information/arguments they encounter.

            Some years down the road I believe I’ll create a site and might even do some type of face-to-face debates on YouTube or something. I’d love to debate some of these chumps, lol.

            Reply

            1. What brand of “online red pills” are the best and who carries them> Thanks I’ll hang up and listen. Keep your eyes on Putin, he wants to take us down!

               Reply

      2. You are right Dana . . . agreeing to disagree is a ‘cop out’.
         So norace dante was clearly uncomfortable with some things being discussed and his body language and expressions showed that he did not want to listen, or was not liking listening to certain things.
         His computer desktop activity probably distracted a fair few people.

         Reply

3. 1) First 20 mins.
   The firt 20 mins of the talk show are very “black”. I think everybody understands what I mean. No need to be very rude. Logical mistakes of the pathetic kind. Not very sharp. At the 18:00 mark I was almost ready to give up. The reason is I have watched some black conpiracists. Very vague and baloneyish and this Dante fits the description amazingly well. Fits like a glove.

   2) About Rae: “These days he takes the position that evolution is “fact” and that Christianity might have been written by Jews and that Jesus didn’t exist. In a mafia, if there is no uniting or cohesive factor/force around a bunch of other power-hungry sociopaths, they can’t stop from killing each other and can’t unite. Clearly they do take orders from somewhere else. I really don’t think the dude is too fukin bright, to be honest. ”

   No. I like your style and I think you bring freshness in thinking to this website Dana. You are a clear thinker. But you are way too simplistic here. He takes the position that evolution is fact. And it is. Personally I think that evolutionISM is bullshit. Not evolution. Evolution is evident. But as an engineer/scientist I would say that it seems that it is not the only “truth”. Some design cannot be denied. But evolution also cannot be denied. Who denies it? It’s just that cats can’t become dogs.

   3) About Rae: “When you defy Lucifer in high politics, you will be punished for it.”

   Again, this is way too simplistic. Are you sure that he (JFK) was not a “martyr” “martyred” by the “deep state”. You know, I think the establishment uses -steam valves-. JFK was interestingly the first NON-race-realist president wasn’t he? What’s all he remembered about now? Oh the JFK assassination.

   Trump was propably proped up to be “assassinated” but I guess after the move of the embassy to Jerusalem now they worship him. It could be that he would be “assassinated” if they think it will be worth to “martyr” him and turn this patriotard Great old Faggots Party figure into some kind of patriotard crusade. Who knows?

   -NOISE- is something that can flood any channel and sometimes the elite use PURE BULLSHIT (even randomness) to obscure any kind of objective truth or meaning from the public. There are a lot of things that don’t hold up with the assassination even from a red pilled prespective. But it is neither my intention nor the topic (This is about this livestream with that Dante) to bring that up.

   4) Again about Rae: “Certain shit Rae says he can’t debate and I presume it’s not because he’s trying to take time off, but because he just doesn’t know what he’s talking about and has to ignore so much contrarian information to these things he’s claiming.”

   Ok, then listen to what he CAN debate. Not only he CAN debate about stuff he is knowledgeable about, but he is very rude when he has to be (when morons try to deflect him towards being more -something- to their favor)…… but polite elsewhere (like a good briton, lol at least that’s the image we greeks have about britons lol hahaaha). I suggest you listen to his podcast “whites genes jews” or something like that. I was surprised, but pleased, to listen to him fascistically butcher a bunch of jewspiratard anti-zionist baloneyists and deflectors on the topic of “jews”.

   Again, his biggest contributions according to me are Nukes, Science, Chosen people (don’t you think he uncovers “Satanism” this way? if this deception is real?)

   Science is a fuckin piece of fucking bullshit. And is dead since Ein$tein. Completely dead. The big bang is bullshit, and it is just a drop in the fuckin OCEAN, there are innumerably more wrong things. Devastatingly wrong. This is not an overstatement. Science and religion were always connected. And now they hijacked Science with judeic surrealism. Science revisionism is absolutely necessary. And there is not even a single person except Rae, Bill Gaede and Stephen Crothers who do it holistically. They don’t just show an equation to be wrong. They show that everything after the Michelson Morely experiment in the late 19th century is ABSOLUTE BALONEY. It is religious imagination and white science is DEAD right now. Technology is her daughter which for a certain 50 years more it will continue to expand. Until a serious crisis of theory will emerge and in a possible combination with a possible economic downturn. We’ll get back to being axe-bearing blonde warriors invading rome with sticks. He has absolutely destroyed the chosen people that has done this and NO-ONE (neither Bill Gaede nor Stephen Crothers nor ANYONE ELSE) has made this connection between the killshot to science with honorary maschiah St Einstein AND the chosenite attitude to rationalism, to science, and to bullshit (they are friendly to, AND create bullshit).

   About Christianity, and I apologize but I will be frank here. I think that 40% of Christians (NOT including Dana Heart, and I am not implying anything here) are tending towards pure BULLSHIT. There are christians like this dummy commenter “Deus Vult”, who think that White Christians are “The chosen people”. I ASSUME that when a scientific person like Rae listens to pure abrahamic baloney. He tends to get suspicious. The connections with these chosenisms and special categories and Christianity are evident. What’s the point? Well I think 80% of muslims and 101% of the chosen people are feral bullshiters too. So IN SOME DENOMINATIONS Christianity is like a relatively european and mild Judaism. When someone who could care less like me (Fox) or him (Rae) can easily wonder then “It could have been the chosens that created that, couldn’t they”. Now from this point and on. I won’t give a shit. But Rae does.

   I personally respect like 20% of Christians who display characteristics that I like. One fantastic example is my favorite movie that is interestingly christian “The Devil’s Advocate”. Brutality and raw violence againt proven degeneracy is what I simply CELEBRATE like a fuckin GOAL in football. And some Christians display these characteristics. MOST DO NOT!!!! But Islam is WORSE and of course the mafia “religion” of the chosen people gets the award as the most Shizophrenic but at the same time materialistic freakin piece of insane GARBAGE this planet has EVER produced. If God is watching, he has to be LAUGHING at the madness……

   5) Getting back to Dante. I watched the entire thing. It was very far reaching and Dante said a lot of bullshit that were flying around my ears while I was busy doing something else. Definitely worth listening to it again in a silent enviroment. Because my radar picked up a lot of baloney. I will comment on Dante again.

   Reply

   1. Trump was Time Magazine’s Person of the Year in 2016, had made another Time cover before being “elected” in 2016 and he has also made at least one Rolling Stone cover before being ‘elected’ in 2015. In occultist-talk, this means he was already “in” with the Kabal, and numerous other pieces of evidence have shown him being “in” on this all for a long time. Like, did you see that YT clip with Trump on Oprah’s show in 1988 where Trump said if he ever ran, he’d run republican because they’re stupid. Every one of those videos got deleted one night almost instantaneously. I saw the vid before it was deleted, and it was quickly never to be found again on YT. This means YT is doing it’s part in propping up Trump, and the agenda to delete many other Trump releases has been at play as well. Are they trying to assassinate Trump? Of course not; he’s a made-man in mafia talk.

      JFK was also Time Magazine’s Man of the Year and I presume because he was “in” on it as well before ever taking office. He got accolades by the establishment for what he did during his first year in office but seemed to start growing a mind of his own. This happens frequently in occultist circles and there are countless examples of it, and if you grow too much of a mind of your own, you will be punished or outright stopped. Yes, it is that simple. Rae doesn’t know because he doesn’t know shit about the occult. The occult is e.v.e.r.y.w.h.e.r.e.

      JFK the first non-race-realist American president? No. Look at this for example:

      “To the astonishment of many, including many in his own party, on July 26, 1948 Harry Truman made one of the biggest contributions to date for racial integration and equality. In issuing Executive Order 9981 Truman ordered the desegregation of the armed forces. These documents trace what some call the beginning of the Civil Rights movement.”

      https://www.trumanlibrary.org/dbq/civilrights.php

      The idea that there were no differences in race started creeping into America in the 20’s, but many people still believed there were differences in intelligence between the races, which started to slowly decline around this period, but especially after the 60s. So it would have been quite common to be a race-realist until the 60s or so. Speaking of race realism, I take it this is true and would explain why so many die-hard Hitlerians are so dumb on the topic of race realism, lol (the last sentence):

      “The hereditarian view began to change in the 1920s in reaction to excessive eugenicist claims regarding abilities and moral character, and also due to the development of convincing environmental arguments.[32] In the 1940s many psychologists, particularly social psychologists, began to argue that environmental and cultural factors, as well as discrimination and prejudice, provided a more probable explanation of disparities in intelligence. According to Franz Samelson, this change in attitude had become widespread by then,[33] with very few studies in race differences in intelligence, a change brought out by an increase in the number of psychologists not from a “lily-white … Anglo-Saxon” background but from Jewish backgrounds. Other factors that influenced American psychologists were the economic changes brought about by the depression and the reluctance of psychologists to risk being associated with the Nazi claims of a master race.[34] The 1950 race statement of UNESCO, prepared in consultation with scientists including Klineberg, created a further taboo against conducting scientific research on issues related to race.[35] Adolf Hitler banned IQ testing for being “Jewish” as did Joseph Stalin for being “bourgeois”.”

      Reply

   2. Evolution is ‘fact’ and is ‘evident’? Why say that and then say cats can’t become dogs, though?

      I’ve already said over here on a previous article that I don’t dispute the idea, for example, that a race can grow bigger or smaller brains over time or become taller or shorter over time as another example. None of this would make said race a different species, but I totally dispute the idea that one species can and does turn into another one over time, as this is a genetic impossibility (unless of course there is some kind of science experiment with DNA tampering or something). I’ve tried to debate many evolutionists and the fucking clowns don’t debate. They parrot the evolutionary scripts they’re taught in school or college and haven’t examined hardly any of the mounds of counter-evolution evidence. I’ve tried to debate Ryan Faulk on it, for example, and as another example, some scrawny, pro-Jew “white nationalist” college student on FB named Garret Nelson. He was talking about evolution and I simply came up and said the evidence against evolution is far greater than the evidence for evolution, and he told me the opposite. He obviously had spent no time researching it, and he’s the type that assumes everyone he comes across on FB is a nobody and/or bullshitter, lol. He’s right about that in a lot of ways, but he forgot to include himself in that category, lol. So I politely started asking him questions about evolution that I know he has never been asked before and never asked himself and started inserting information against evolution on his thread (I can go on for weeks) and the fucking clown got butt-hurt and “defriended” me on FB, lol. What is/are your specific view/s of evolution in regards to why you say it’s ‘fact’ and that it’s ‘evident’, Fox?

      No worries about religion, Fox. I do agree with quite a few of your views on many Christians because they’re true in a lot of ways. I mean, I’m Christian-leaning but wouldn’t really fit in with the entire concept of being a Christian, at least not according to many people. There are plenty of Christians who like to take whatever passage it is out of the Bible to suit whatever preconceived notion/s they might have regarding any topic and it’s weak AF because the passages are all about context, and as another example, they can often find many opposing Biblical views on anything they’ve cited to back up why they think what they think. It’s just that in Rae’s case, he seemed to be aware of quite a few anti-Christian Jews in 2014, but these days doesn’t seem to even bother mentioning them and is on the “Jesus never existed”, pro-evolution kick. Someone who doesn’t know what’s good about Christianity reality doesn’t know about why the occult/sorcerers operates the way they do, and talking about it will typically go right over their heads.

      Reply

      1. @Dana

         Well obviously this isn’t the place to debate evolution (but a little talk is no injury). But my personall assumptions are these:

         1) What is roughly termed as “microevolution” by biologists I would personally say is evident. I can give examples, but I guess you agree, right? If not I can become specific.

         2) What is roughly termed as “macroevolution” is laughable according to me Fox. That’s because I am a scientist and I would classify this as a super far-fetched hyperimplausible utter shit. I mean it’s a hypothesis… alright… But I can hypothesize that you (Dana) are an alien and I am David Duchovny. Whatever man… I could be David Duchovny. And you can be a Mexican alien? Who knows? Who cares… If I am using a hypothesis to prove other hypotheses which is what the pseudoscientists who are the establishment do, then I am a moron.

         The big bang is bullshit. They are schizos. They (scientific establishment circa early 20th cent) tended to somehow get carried away with certain thoughts. They were in a good comfortable place with spontaneous creation stories like Big Bangs and everything-out-of-a-single-cell kind of theories. But these are falling apart. Certainly at the macroscopical level. We don’t even know our cosmos AT ALL. This is such an understatement. We know NOTHING.

         We should be careful what we say in public… if we realize that much of our mainstream knowledge is either pure siliness, pure lies, or even pure fuckin visual fakes that the brain cannot process quickly and needs reviewing/rethinking……….. ……like 9/11

         Reply

         1. P.S. about hypotheses

            No scientist except Stephen Crothers, Bill Gaede and 4 people I will not name here, are using occam’s razor. Occam’s razor is a good razor. Cuts the bullshit. Establishment scientists don’t do that. They are not scientists either but that’s another question from another thing….

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor

            Reply

         2. Rae West talks about evolution as if it’s “fact”. Dude will get smoked in a debate on it with anyone who has actually looked into evolutionary counter-arguments is what I’m saying. For him to be so sure about it is very bothersome to me.

            Reply

4. P.S. MAINSTREAM orthodox greek Christians have sat down with me, using alcohol interestingly (lol) and tried to explain to me is that the holy spirit IS God. But God is NOT the holy spirit. Same with the SON.

   Well. I am a rationalist like Rae. When I listen to such stuff, the first thought that crosses my mind is this “shut up, clear your mind of bullshit, and do your JOB which is to think rationally, because you are for the HOSPITAL with this mideastern illogic”.

   I appreciate that Christians have a way of explaining things. But they are always using -personal experiences- to do that. That’s good. But why “believe” to begin with? I mean why would I believe that something IS something else, but that the something else IS NOT the something….

   …AND THEN try to ad-hoc the situation out of proportion by trying to explain this?

   This is just ONE out of MANY examples where a lot of (though certainly not ALL, but I would say the majority of) Christians that have spoken with me, INCLUDING 2 orthodox ‘priests’, have given me

   A) Surrealism…. and then….

   B) Ad-hoc shit to ‘logic-ize’ the situation which is a game which is lost, it is 4-1 and it has 10 mins to be played lol

   Reply

   1. Yeah, and there are a lot of quasi and pseudo-Christians out there who are either just dabblers or they present themselves as Christian to fool others or even think this is going to earn them some kind of ‘brownie points’ in the after-life, lol. This of course is not just in Christianity, but there are countless clowns in the ranks of every other religion out there, including among atheists (atheism is a religion, too).

      Just wanted to add that I don’t see the need for a ‘pure-white’ ethno-state because there are races of people in every group who do stick up for whites amongst their own. They’re a small number, but they really pay the price for it. I noticed this even among blacks. Blacks are a very special case and in all my months around them, I definitely saw my share of pro-white blacks who would stick up for whites and try to do the right thing, but this is very costly around other blacks. I mean the last thing this is doing is winning them favors or respect from other blacks, lol, or even from the rest of society in general. I respect the battle for justice, morals, work ethic and the good-fight spirit displayed among these people and think they’d be great additions to any white-ethnostate, even though they’re very small in number. A small amount of pro-whites who never interact with blacks but have become aware of their atrocities, racism, etc., online get their panties in a bunch when you say things like this, but they’re just inexperienced ignoramuses. Black pro-whites are easy to identify as well; all one has to do is start talking about black/white racial dynamics. It’s very easy to find blacks who are pro-white because very few exist and their positions are so contrarian to all the rest of the blacks, so it’s not as though a pro-white black can just ‘trick you’ into thinking they are when they’re not, lol.

      Reply

5. Ohh…. Dear…. God…. Not the “establishment want ethnonationalism” shit….. Come on Dante….

   What’s with Rome? ……….I am addressing all conspiracists out there: There are many things that you (I could even say ‘we’, I consider myself a conspiracy researcher) say that lead to a catch22 situation where the answer is always: “So what?”. Rome is an example…. Dante qualifies as a specialista IMPLIER. These people IMPLY… They expect a type of “whohoooo dante! whacha mean?” kind of response. But the Generalissimo types like Brandon are way too composed to ‘bite the cheese’ har har har…..

   Dante… What a specialista…. I would personally classify him as pseudointellectuale specialiste. Has a perfume of Le Paris…. Couldn’t be a ghetto brutha if he smells like pseudointellectuale specialiste…

   So what’s the plan of the elite? To force us into some kind of race war situation? Well could be.. Because some of the cop shootings by blacks seemed fake. But I cannot personally vouch for it since it needs reviewing….. I just personally think that they want to focus on whites. I would assume that’s because the chosen people and their white buddies think that the only force that can fuck their assholes is the White Man (as a platonic idea). And that’s because we have proved historically that we can literally kick their asses out of places. Kudos to the heroes that liberated parts of Greece from the chosen people in WW2. They expropriated them and that’s why I like panzers now… har har har….

   Bottom line. Dante talks way above his head. He seemed friendly and likeable but I detected “muh-philosophy” kind of Fpecialista faggotry. Many hypotheses. Not too many explainations…. Maybe none at all….

   Congratulations to Brandon for the explaination of the chosen people’s FOCUS on whites. That was the best part of the talk show. You should just fuckin package that and rub it to the face of anyone that is a jews-hate-all equalizationist. Oh they hate us all equally… So don’t band together as whites…. lol 😛

   Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.