Two Options to Secure Our Nationalism

In my last interview with YouTuber Brutus the British, I explained that there are essentially only two options to establish a lasting nationalist project for our people.

Considering the massive multiracialization and liberalization of once-homogenous Western societies over the past decades, we obviously cannot coexist peacefully with the non-white races or their white liberal champions among our people.

For obvious reasons, the non-white invaders are incompatible with our cultures and present a lasting threat to the continued existence of our people. Their presence here will, over time, lead to mass miscegenation which means the death of our genetic stock, and with it our heritage, culture and civilization.

The white liberals, SJWs, globalists and leftists of all stripes are likewise an implacable foe of the continued existence and well-being of whites. They openly side with the invaders and work to silence dissenting voices opposing the Kalergite project for white genocide through intimidation, censorship and violence.

We cannot live on the same territory as these two groups. So we must therefore separate.

This can only happen in two ways: we either expel all of these people from our lands or we create a smaller territory and prohibit them from entering our new nation.

What other option do we have? As long as liberals and leftists are able to influence politics in our countries, the situation will continue to get worse and worse. They won’t stop until whites are extinct. That’s their mission. So they must be permanently excluded from our societies.

The hypocrite liberals and leftists refuse to go live amongst the non-white races that they adore so much, preferring safe and clean white-only neighbourhoods even while they advocate and facilitate the non-white invasion of the West. Ideally the pro-invasion leftists would all be deported to Africa where they can stew in all the ‘cultural enrichment’ they want.

The other option of forging a new, smaller nation is also viable. Non-whites, Jews and white liberals would be permanently prohibited from entering the territory. A new nation  would however be subject to invasion and pressure from leftist-controlled states in Europe. But so would an existing nation that was under the control of nationalists, as World War II demonstrated. That simply can’t be avoided. We will have to fight for our ideals and our survival against a myriad of enemies hellbent on our destruction.

As a disclaimer, I am not advocating violence or that people randomly go out and try to implement this right now. But when the right time does arise – when we have some form of political power – an amicable separation must be implemented. Repatriation of the non-whites and geographical separation from white leftists (including of course the Jewish elites behind the Kalergi plan) is a clear necessity if we are to save our people and civilization from ruin.

The non-white races have already implanted their genes firmly on our continent. Each day our heritage is being eroded with each new non-white/mixed race baby that is born of miscegenation. The only way to reverse this decay is through repatriation of the non-whites to their homelands or their parents’ homelands. If their parents were able to pack up and leave their countries of origin to start new lives in our nations, it shouldn’t be a problem for second or third generation children of immigrants to resettle in their parents’ countries.

12 thoughts on “Two Options to Secure Our Nationalism

  1. I agree with nationalism
    However we have to have a religion to rally around . That would in my opinion be Catholocism. Ethnos needs Logos.

    1. Well yes Dan . . . .
      And I would add . . .
      Romans 12 -2 (youth bible) Do not change yourselves to be like the people of this world, but be changed within by a new way of thinking. Then you will be able to decide what god wants for you.

      Romans 12 -2 (NIV) Do not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God’s will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will.

      Romans 12 -2 (KJV) And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.

      IMHO it means “do not strive to fit into the culture around you (get dragged down to its level of immaturity), but instead do what you know to be right – God’s wholesome version of right of course . . . you will be better for it. IMHO

  2. “This can only happen in two ways: we either expel all of these people from our lands or we create a smaller territory and prohibit them from entering our new nation.”

    Concerning the ratio of white libtards to pro-whites, it logically follows that the ratio is still too heavily skewed in favor of the libtards compared to pro-whites for expulsions to take place, albeit this is fortunately rapidly changing. Libtards can’t be expelled yet with their overwhelming numbers and laws, politicians, and media on their side, so tiny white, pro-white enclaves will naturally form first. They should be and eventually will be no-go zones for anti-white Muslims and all other anti-whites. When the number of pro-whites eventually gets big enough, they can and will start expelling people from their areas. It’s gonna take time though, no doubt about it… the pro-white movement is still in it’s infancy, just like MGTOW, but rapidly growing.

    There are a small and slowly growing number of non-whites who are genuinely pro-white, and making friendships and bonds with them is beneficial. Like I have this black FB buddy named Darnell Givens who I’ve known for many years online since 2012; first encountered him in men’s rights groups. The dude is cool as shit, and he’s uncommonly intelligent/rational, a good person, and a productive member of society. He’s been pro-white for as long as I’ve known him, just that he has naturally become more so with the more information he studies. Frankly, I’d rather see him in a white enclave than probably the vast majority of whites. There are a small number of blacks who are pro-white and vocal about it, and they get attacked like crazy by other blacks, and sometimes white libtards too… it’s not like they’re doing what they do for looks or public acceptance, lol. They’re just aware that blacks on the whole are amoral, dumb mofos who leave a heeelluva lot to be desired. There are a small number of non-whites who are legitimately worthy of being in white, pro-white enclaves.

      1. You know when you talk to somebody, it ‘sorta’ helps to include a specific or two, now and again, so that you don’t leave the recipient guessing about very vague (including dumb as shit) statements you make. What specifically did I say that got your low-IQ panties in a bunch or are you too dumb and cowardly to answer?

  3. On the subject of refusing to debate . . . this is amusing:

    Goebbels missed no opportunity for humor, sarcasm or mockery. . . .

    . . . Another stunt he organized was a “debate” with Chancellor Heinrich Brüning.
    Because Brüning refused to participate, Goebbels “debated” an empty chair, responding — in Rush Limbaugh style — to a phonograph recording of a speech by the Chancellor.
    With wit and sarcasm, Goebbels “ironed flat” his colorless opponent — to roars of laughter from the mass audience.
    Berliners loved such audacious spectacles, and showed their appreciation at the ballot box.
    In May 1928 Goebbels was elected as a deputy to the German parliament (Reichstag), and six months later was elected to the city council.

    From Mark Weber’s “Goebbels’ Place in History”
    http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v15/v15n1p18_Weber.html

  4. Nice Dorset. 🙂

    Lol Brandon, ‘a real audio debate’. We know it ain’t like that dude has anything to debate anyways, but another of the many reasons I’ve had no desire to audio debate is because if you want the debate to get any semi-relevant views, you have to be the type of person that does debates consistently on your YT channel. You have to take the time to nurture the channel for it to grow and gain popularity/credibility or else it’ll stay really small and is most likely to just be a waste of time.

    After realizing the US government is incredibly corrupt (which I did very quickly), I was not of the knowledge that government corruption somewhat close to the American government’s was so pervasive around the world. I was of the impression, because I hadn’t studied much of it, that their problems were mostly superficial and not so bad.

    So when I got into the Manosphere, what I was really concerned about was finding ‘poosy paradise’. Unfortunately with the more I learned, I began to realize it’s just not so easy to haphazardly go to such places without much of a care in the world, because the world has gotten into an increasingly volatile state economically. Not just ‘some’ countries, but any country could be in much worse shape than it appears on the surface. So I’ve had to lower my standards and adjust poosy paradise to semi-poosy paradise with a semi-stable economy goddammit, lol.

    All I really care about at this point in time is figuring out WTF is going on in the worldwide economy. Shit’s getting bad. I’ll be gotdamned if I leave the minefield and house of glass that is the US economy, just to unwittingly hop into another economic minefield, Like in this interview for instance, after the 10-minute mark, he talks about this Brazilian dude he knows who’s living there who told him that he has never seen things as bad as they are right now. He said the interest rate for a collateralized loan is 20%, and the interest rate for a non-collateralized loan is 100%. That’s horrible, and it’s looking like I’m gonna have to scratch Brazil off the list for sure, goddammit. This is very disappointing:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jk86bYpBSLk

    1. ^That dude above is even pro-Trump. This below is much more like it. Maybe some possible time in the future I might get into doing audio debates, but only when I really have the time to put into it. I’m just working on positioning myself in an at least semi-safe/non-volatile situation. It’s pointless to make loads of cash when the shit can rapidly evaporate right in front of you. Some of these dudes in the know are even saying a crash might occur on a Friday, and by Monday, you’re SOL. Trump’s tariffs aren’t gonna work like Trumpians think they will, and the writing is on the wall here, and I’ve really gotta get outta dodge, boyz.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfFcEEikeU0

      I do believe we have pretty much everything covered. This movement will keep growing as more and more people start to catch on. At the beginning, it’s so important to be operating from the correct paradigms (or as close to them as possible) or else so much time and resources get wasted when they’re of the essence.

    2. I don’t see why someone has to have a big channel to do an audio debate. It’s not like there are 1000s of people reading these comments so I don’t see why it would be any more a waste of time to debate here than on a YouTube video.

      1. A person doesn’t have to have a big channel to do an audio debate or anything but I’m an all-or-nothing type dude. I don’t really dabble in anything. It’s like I’m either gonna really do it or not do it at all. If I do an online debate, I want to do it when I have the time to do follow-up debates and when I have the time to grow a channel and make vids consistently. It looks pathetic in my view, if say, I do an online audio debate and then people are making response and/or attack vids to me and I’m not around to defend my positions. If I did an online debate and then was away for a couple years and found people had been coming at me, it’d make me extremely livid at those people. Might sound odd, but that’s me. I’m an extremely competitive dude lol. It’s part of why I’ve deactivated my FB account because I don’t want random d-bags coming around talking shit if I’m not gonna be there lol.

        I’m gonna be around in the future doing some drug-free power lifting vids/challenges anyway, just for the hell of it, just because it’s impressive, and just to talk shit to haters. I need to get settled first though because when I get into poker-mode, I often have long stretches where I don’t hit the gym because I’m trying to make as much money as fast as possible, and I’ve got more times like this coming up. I’m sure I’ll do some online debates in the future, but the thought of having to build a fukin channel from scratch doesn’t sit well with me. I’ve done many things from scratch already and really want to avoid it these days.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MEMBER LOG-IN

Subscribe

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

CLICK HERE TO BECOME A MEMBER

Archives

Alex Jones Alt-Right Australia Blacks BLM Brandon Martinez Canada China Communism Coronavirus Dugin Europe Fags feminism Germany Globalism Immigration Islam Israel Jews Jordan Peterson Kalergi Kalergi plan Leftism Migrants Muslims nationalism Palestine Politics Power Putin Race Richard Spencer Russia Spain Trump UK Ukraine US USA White genocide White Nationalism Whites Women Zionism

Categories

PRIVACY POLICY
TERMS OF USE POLICY

Martinez Perspective