Justin Trudeau Cuddles With Deviant Tranny, Fueling Rumors He Got a Good Ass Raping Afterwards

4 thoughts on “Justin Trudeau Cuddles With Deviant Tranny, Fueling Rumors He Got a Good Ass Raping Afterwards”

1. Kudos to Brandon Martinez for using “itself” instead of “herself” in referring to a LOL “transwoman,” who has less reality than unicorns. By using female pronouns in talking about these mentally ill males and ex-males, we inadvertently endorse the wholly fallacious identity the trannies are trying to sell: they are NOT women, NOT female, any more than LOL “transmen” are men and male, nor can they ever become so.

   And if the deluded homosexual is post-op, it can’t actually be called HE, HIM, HIMSELF either, as it has become a neuter, an ex-male. In fact, the critter isn’t even a homosexual anymore, because by definition a homosexual is one who is sexually attracted to his or her own sex.

   The “transgender” myth (there are NO transgender people, NO sex change) is one of the filthiest and most dangerous weapons that the enemies of Western Civilization are employing. It has to be challenged and defied, and the first step in resisting it is never relinquishing the factual high ground–namely the obvious fact that there is no transgender, no such thing as sex-reassignment.

   Reply

   1. Can I ask what you mean “there is no such thing as sex-reassignment”? Can you elaborate?

      Reply

      1. Nothing easier! What is called “sex-reassignment” is merely COSMETIC surgery accompanied by hormonal treatments that can’t transform a male into a female nor a female into a male. Let’s just focus a bit on the so-called male to female transition (which is actually a transition not to female but to NEUTER).

         If a woman were a person who merely lacked the male reproductive system, removing a man’s reproductive parts would result in a woman. But LOL a woman is a person with her own specific reproductive system. And “sex-reassignment” does not implant that system: it doesn’t introduce or install a uterus, fallopian tubes, ovaries, ova, cervix, clitoris, vulva, actual vagina (instead of a misshapen vacuum where a prostate gland used to be), or XX chromosomes; it merely REMOVES male parts.

         TO REMOVE MALE PARTS IS NOT TO INTRODUCE FEMALE PARTS. Castration produces a woman no more than a hysterectomy produces a man.

         LOL, if lacking male parts equals femaleness, then this computer I’m using is a female. So’s this table. So’s everything in this room here save yours truly, who’s got all the constituent parts which define maleness.

         What “sex-reassignment” creates are neuters. Ex-males. Eunuchs. Castrati. NOT GIRLS LOL….
         When people have veterinarians spay or castrate their dogs, nobody believes that the spayed bitch becomes a male or that the castrated male dog becomes a bitch: the former would need to grow a dick and balls to become a male, while the latter would have to grow a vagina, uterus, ovaries, etc. The exactly same thing is true where humans are concerned.

         “Transwomen” neither have such constituent parts as define femaleness (which is not the same thing as femininity, by the way: a male may be effeminate or feminine but completely male, just as the most masculine dyke is completely female, capable of conceiving, gestating, giving birth) NOR menstruate nor ovulate nor conceive nor gestate, etc. Of course, the people pushing the tranny agenda will say “Well, there are women who can’t conceive. If there can be women who can’t bear children, why is a transwoman not a real woman because she can’t have children?” The answer is that there’s all the difference in the world between a male or ex-male neuter who can’t bear children and a constitutionally female person who can’t. The latter is dysfunctional: she has the apparatus which would indeed perform the female role in reproduction but is faulty, damaged or diseased. On the other hand, the delusional male homosexual (misnamed “transwoman”), no less than the post-op ex-male neuter, is LOL not even dysfunctional, because he or it is not constituted to bear children IN ANY CASE WHATSOEVER, even in the best of physiological health.

         The reason I can’t get knocked up and give birth is not that I’m dysfunctional. I don’t contain any parts which if in good working condition would enable me to be pregnant and give birth. The only way I could be sexually dysfunctional is if I can’t produce spermatozoa or can’t transmit them to a vagina and ovum.

         To put it another way: a refrigerator is not dysfunctional because it fails to transmit music. It’s constituted to freeze some things and keep others cold. A radio, on the other hand, IS dysfunctional if it fails to transmit music. Unlike the refrigerator, it IS constituted to transmit music. It may not, but only because a wire or tube is damaged or faulty, or the whole machine has grown too old and lost function (which also happens to women). Well, analogously, trannies are refrigerators which claim to be radios, and when people object and point out that they never transmit music, the trannies say “Well, neither do some radios!” LOL

         I suppose one hardly need add that NO trannies ever get pregnant and give birth, or can, while billions of women do, and ALL women can if healthy and not smitten with the physiological degeneracy that age brings. As a self-respecting young woman wrote in Twitter, if we put thousands of men and trannies on a remote island together, in about 100 years the island would be uninhabited, whereas if thousands of men and women were put on the island their main problem vis-a-vis continuance would be how to catch fish and reach the coconuts. As long as they had the fish and coconuts, life would go on.

         The neutering that goes under the name “sex-reassignment” is, again, cosmetic, and relieves the discomfort that these mentally ill people feel when looking at their naked bodies in the mirror and finding not a vulva but a penis and scrotum. It removes a stubborn contradiction of what they fervently desire to believe about themselves. THAT’S ALL.

         Interestingly, there used to be an Internet site (it still may exist?) owned by a post-op tranny who had become thoroughly disillusioned and was blaming other people for the atrocity that had been perpetrated on its once male body. This poor soul, who’d seen the light too late, wrote of a court case in which about the most noted “sex-change” surgeon testified. I blush for including the latter’s testimony as an argument for something that reason by itself makes clear, but in any case the surgeon was asked by the cross-examining attorney, “What is the gender or sex of your patients after you operate on them?” and the surgeon said “Neuter.”

         Well, he told the truth. These mentally ill men and women do not get re-assigned to the opposite sex. They just lose the sex they were born with. Gender is not a choice but a destiny.

         At least for the foreseeable future? If someday science discovers how, perhaps with cell culture (?), to graft and grow functional parts of the opposite sex on people whose original reproductive system has been removed, THEN sex change will become a reality. It seems impossible, but if anyone told Leonardo da Vinci that people would someday be able to talk with folks on the other side of the Earth with cell phones, he, though perhaps the most innovative mind ever, would’ve probably said “No–non e’ possibile!” Then again, for ACTUAL sex transition to take place, there’d have to be a transformation, in the case of males, of persons capable of impregnating females into those capable of being impregnated, and, in the case of females, vice versa.

         In any event, for the foreseeable future, pushing the transgender myth will remain an excellent weapon in the hands of those who hate Western Civilization, as it will cruelly fracture our society and condemn more and more of its members to irremediable sterility because, as the surgery doesn’t transform people into the opposite sex, it destroys their capacity to reproduce–and that’s something desired by those who wish to see us gone forever.

         Actually, I’ll be writing an article about all this for my website/blog, and dealing with all the notions involved in promoting and defending the transgender myth, such as the efficacy of self-identification, and the being “a woman in a man’s body” and vice versa, and the confusion of femininity and masculinity with femaleness and maleness. What I put down here is only part of the argument against the reddest of the red herrings (though perhaps just as red are the negrocentric claims to the ancient civilizations of West Asia and Mediterranean-basin Africa).

         Reply

2. That one needs LOL to explain why castrating a man doesn’t change him into a woman, suggests the sorry state our movement is in…. Anyone who can’t see it immediately has serious limitations where rationality is concerned. It’s like “Hm, how do you figure?” LOLLLLL!!!! “Can you enlarge on that?”

   When I debated the issue in YT, my two best allies were women. On THESE pages women are lambasted for being imbecilic, but one of those allies of mine, “Freya Incarnate” (also a White Nationalist) simply said “A man with his dick cut off is not a woman. He’s a man with his dick cut off.” And the other woman, whose cyberspatial name was Seriphimofextacy, said the same in almost the same words, though I doubt if she knew of Freya’s dictum. How more rational can one get than that?

   Certainly women don’t rise to the intellectual mountain peaks that men reach, BUT….it’s evident that plenty of women are smarter than plenty of men.

   Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.