Turncoat Jeff Schoep Speaks Generic Gibberish in a Synagogue

The former head of the US-based National Socialist Movement is now an “anti-extremism” advocate for a weird cult called Light Is Light.

Here he is giving a talk in a Jewish synagogue.

It’s literally impossible for someone to honestly go from understanding the Jewish question to sympathizing with Jews… unless a large payout has been made.

Only money talks in this respect. There is no “unlearning” truths about the Jews, their influence, and the damage they’ve done to our civilization. There is no “unlearning” that white replacement is happening at an alarming rate in all white countries. These things are happening. Jeff Schoep knows they are happening. But he is now lying to people and saying that they are not happening or that the answer to them is not becoming a white nationalist but some kind of hippie peace activist. Only a big bag of Jew money can swing a person so rapidly to an opposing philosophy.

Here he is on C-Span.

I’m no fan of the cringe cosplay optics of the National Socialist Movement that he led. They have clown optics. But they are all obviously completely red-pilled on the issues that matter to white people.

His abrupt departure from the movement coincided precisely with his legal and financial troubles related to Charlottesville. He is obviously doing this for a paycheck… a big, fat Jewish paycheck.

Notice in all of his “talks” he just rambles on about the movement, how people get recruited to the movement, the mindset of people in the movement… but never does he actually refute the ideas of the movement. He just talks generically about the ideas of the movement without refuting them. This is the same dishonest model as the ADL, SPLC and other filthy charlatans. They never even attempt to refute the ideas that we propose; they just repeat our ideas and attach a series of negative pejoratives to them.

The reason they do this is because they can’t refute our ideas, they can only attack individuals who espouse these ideas and highlight the personal flaws of characters in the movement. They have no defense against our arguments, our ideas, because our ideas are correct, rooted in basic logic and common sense, as well as irrefutable facts.

Schoep will go on with his generic banter without ever explaining how he came to disbelieve in things that are demonstrably true.